This articlemay contain anexcessive number of citations. Please helpimprove it byremoving low-quality or irrelevant citations.(August 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |

Visual processing abnormalities in schizophrenia are commonly found, and contribute to poor social function.[1]
There is evidence thatschizophrenia affectsperception ofcontrast andmotion, control ofeye movements, detection of visual contours, and recognition offaces orfacial expressions. The specificity of manyvisual processing abnormalities in schizophrenia is still an area of active debate within the scientific community.[2][3][4][5][6]
Contrast is a feature of visual stimuli that characterizes the difference inbrightness between dark and light regions of an image. Perception of contrast is affected by the temporal frequency andspatial frequency properties of a stimulus, and the sensitivity to contrast insine wave stimuli is characterized by thecontrast sensitivity function. Contrast sensitivity has been shown to be impaired in schizophrenia.[7][8][9][10] There is evidence that these impairments may be more severe among people with predominantlynegative symptoms,[8][9] or those who are notmedicated.[10]Butler and colleagues[11][medical citation needed] have proposed that people with schizophrenia may have a specific deficit in themagnocellular visual processing pathway, andelectroencephalography (EEG) data have been presented that may support this view.[11][medical citation needed] Results from pharmacological studies in cats[12] have demonstrated the role ofNMDA in contrast perception of magnocellular-tuned stimuli. Application of drugs thatdeactivate thisglutamate receptor type led to reduced neural responses in the visual system of cats, and some argue this suppression is similar to the reduced behavioral responses observed among people with schizophrenia. They claim these results are consistent with theglutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia,[12] which proposes that dysfunction in this neurotransmitter system leads to abnormal neural activity underlying this disorder. Skottun and colleagues[6] dispute the magnocellular deficit theory however, saying that there is not enough evidence from different research groups to support it, and that the experiments focused on this topic have shown very mixed results.
The perceived contrast of a stimulus is sometimes suppressed when another stimulus is presented surrounding it, an effect known assurround suppression (see Figure 1), which is similar to thesimultaneous contrast illusion. In schizophrenia, estimations of perceived contrast in surround suppression are less suppressed than for healthy adults.[13][14][15] Further, the magnitude of this perceptual suppression effect has been shown to correlate with the concentration ofGABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), aninhibitory neurotransmitter, in thevisual cortex.[15] These results may illustrate the role of GABA in mechanisms that regulate the overall level of neural activity[16] in visual cortex, and it has been suggested that such mechanisms may be disrupted in schizophrenia.[12] Such a disruption would be consistent with theGABA hypothesis of schizophrenia,[17][18] which states that dysfunctional GABAergic inhibition may disrupt neural activity in subjects with this disorder, and this in turn may lead to visual processing abnormalities.[15]
Motion perception is an important visual function and occurs from the earliest stages of cortical visual processing, with individual neurons being tuned to a preferred direction of motion.[19] The cortical areaMT (medial temporal cortex, also known as V5) plays a significant role in motion processing, and deactivation of this region usingTranscranial magnetic stimulation can affect perception of motion.[20] Subjects with schizophrenia have shown abnormalities in perceptual judgments of motion, speed and direction,[21][22][23][24] with deficits in these judgments generally being reported. It has been suggested that these findings are related to the aforementionedmagnocellulardeficit purported to exist in this disorder.[24]Inhibition of motion perception by the addition of a surround stimulus has also been examined in schizophrenia, with one group finding evidence both of impaired motion perception and weaker perceptual suppression effects in schizophrenia.[22] This agrees with the findings mentioned previously related toweaker suppression of perceived contrast in this disorder.[13][14][15] However, another recent report has disputed this finding, instead showing evidence consistent with stronger surround influence on motion perception in schizophrenia.[21]
Eye movements are important behaviors for locating and tracking objects in the visual world. Two of the major types of eye movements aresaccades andsmooth pursuit. Saccades are very rapid and precise eye movements between two positions, and are important in establishingfixation. Smooth pursuit on the other hand, allows the viewer to track a moving object along its trajectory within the visual field. Deficits in eye movement behavior among people with schizophrenia have been reported since the beginning of the 20th century.[25] Genetic factors are believed to be involved in these abnormalities, as unaffected relatives show similar dysfunction.[25] Specifically, saccade abnormalities have been observed in this disorder, with people showing changes in saccade rate, amplitude and accuracy.[25] Such deficits have been linked to medication with lithium, as well as to damage in frontal lobe regions.[25] Further, people with schizophrenia often exhibit errors in smooth pursuit eye movements.[25][26] The neural correlates of smooth pursuit behavior in schizophrenia have been studied usingfunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), with abnormal activation having been observed in multiple cortical regions implicated in motion processing, such asFrontal Eye Fields and areaMT.[26] Some have speculated that errors in smooth pursuit in this disorder may depend on deficits infrontal lobe processing, such as errors in anticipating the direction of stimulus motion, and that this in turn may be consistent withworking memory deficits in schizophrenia.[25] Others have disputed this claim, presenting evidence instead pointing to the aforementioneddeficits in motion processing, and abnormalities in cortical areaMT as a possible source of smooth pursuit errors.[27][medical citation needed] In this experiment, it was found that motion perception and smooth pursuit task performance were correlated, but no relationship between measures of smooth pursuit andattention was observed.
Detecting visual contours, edges, or boundaries is an important function in human andcomputer vision which facilitatesfigure-ground segmentation andobject recognition. Contour integration depends on a subject's ability to link representations of separate visual stimuli into a coherent percept. Subjects with schizophrenia have been shown to perform worse than healthy adults on tasks that depend on contour integration,[12][28][29][30] and these deficits may be related to factors such as illness severity, chronicity, and degree ofdisorganized symptoms.[12] In these experiments, subjects often viewed stimuli that could be connected to form a coherent perception of a line, like a simplifiedconnect the dots puzzle. In general, the magnitude of visual processing abnormalities (such as abnormal contour detection performance) in schizophrenia are fairly small. Therefore, it may be necessary to examine experimental data from a large number of subjects in order to observe difference between healthy adults and those with schizophrenia using statistical methods.It has been proposed that weaker lateral excitation due to deficientNMDA-receptor functioning could disrupt neural processing, and that this might underlie problems with contour integration in schizophrenia. This idea is consistent with theglutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia,[12] as dysfunction in this neurotransmitter system may explain the symptoms observed.
Presentation of collinear stimuli flanking a target can enhance responses to the target in cortex, an effect known as flanker or collinear facilitation, which has been shown to be weaker in those with schizophrenia than in unaffected adults or those withbipolar disorder.[30] Publications from multiple research groups indicate that those with schizophrenia perform more poorly than healthy adults when asked to identify contours composed of separated line segments embedded in backgrounds made up of randomly oriented segments.[28][29] This includes evidence from anfMRI experiment indicating abnormally reduced activation in visual areasV2-4.[29] Another group usedEEG to examineillusory contour processing deficits in schizophrenia.[31][medical citation needed] They found decreased amplitude and altered source location for theP1 component in patients, which they claim reflects abnormaldorsal stream processing in this disorder.
Crowding refers to the phenomenon where recognition of visual stimuli presented in theperiphery is impaired by the presence of other nearby objects (sometimes called "flankers"). Abnormal crowding has been observed in schizophrenia, with different groups reporting stronger[32] or weaker[33][medical citation needed] crowding effects.
Duringgaze shifts, for example when an object appears in the periphery, humans usually move both their eyes and head to capture the object of interest. In experiments, in which participants needed to shift their gaze to detect a visual target, people with schizophrenia exhibit abnormal eye-head coordination, and no modulation of saccadic latency (the delay between onset of the stimulus in the periphery and the start of the gaze shift) occurred, which is usually task dependent in healthy controls as they adjust to different task in terms of saccadic latency.[34][35]
Face perception is a function of the visual system which is critical forsocial behavior. People with schizophrenia have shown abnormalities in tasks designed to probe facial processing and recognition.[36][37][2] Specifically, performance deficits have been observed in this disorder when subjects were asked to identify degraded pictures of faces, and the deficits observed were specific to those with predominantlydisorganized symptoms.[37] Another experiment using the same stimuli duringEEG found poorer performance and slower reaction times among those with schizophrenia, as well as abnormalities inbeta band activity.[36] The authors state that these results are related to deficits in long range coordination of neural activity, as described forcontour detection. Another experiment using EEG and structuralMRI to examine facial processing abnormalities in schizophrenia found decreasedN170 component responses, and this was correlated with decreasedgray matter volumes in thefusiform gyrus.[38][medical citation needed] There is evidence that thefusiform face area is a visual cortical region that may be specialized for detecting faces. The authors of this study conclude that their data support a specific face processing deficit in schizophrenia. However, another study using fractured images of faces found that people with schizophrenia were better than healthy adults at identifying images of famous people that had been distorted.[2] These experiments state that this may be evidence of weaker"configural" processing in schizophrenia, who instead may rely more on local imagefeatures for face identification, as these were preserved in their image manipulation.
Recognizing emotionalexpressions in images of human faces is a particularly important component offace perception with clear implications in humansocial interactions. People with schizophrenia reportedly perform poorly compared with healthy adults when asked to identify facial emotions.[3][4][5][39] Some researchers have claimed that this is not a deficit specific to facial emotion perception per se, but rather evidence of a generalized deficit or overall poorer task performance in schizophrenia.[3][4] However, others have argued that a review of the literature shows evidence of an additional specific deficit in processing negative emotions, such as anger and fear, among those with schizophrenia.[5] In addition, evidence has been presented of a link between a specific emotion processing deficit in schizophrenia and the volume oftemporal lobe structures, includingfusiform gyrus andmiddle temporal gyrus, as measured usingMRI.[39]
In visualbackward masking (VBM) a briefly presented target is followed by a mask, which decreases performance on the target.[40] VBM is a powerful experiment for schizophrenia research.[41] It allows for control over timing at millisecond level, there are well-supported theories of the underlying mechanisms, and it can be easily studied usingEEG andfMRI.[42] Not only patients but also their unaffected siblings show strong and reproducible masking deficits, thus masking deficits have been suggested as anendophenotype for schizophrenia.[42][43][44]
In the early stages of the disease, and in untreated patients, hypersensitivity to lowspatial frequencies has been documented. During the further course (and medication) of schizophrenia, this hypersensitivity turns into hyposensitivity and begins to affect other spatial frequencies of visual perception. Alterations to the visual signal, which are largely inconsistent over the course of schizophrenia (remission and relapse phases), may lead to the formation of inconsistentinternal models of the world. These signal alterations (noise-to-signal ratios) are associated with fluctuations inDopamine andAcetylcholine levels, decreased activity of inhibitory GABAergic interneurons, and hypofunction of NMDAr associated with gradual loss of cell populations in the precortical visual circuit. The volatile and noisy signal from the visual periphery may then act as an amplifier of primarily decreased connectivity within frontal areas, which may then prograde retrogradely to lower cortical areas of the visual information processing circuit.[45]
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)