Kingdom of the Vandals and Alans | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 435–534 | |||||||||||||
.jpg) Coin depictingGelimer (530–534) | |||||||||||||
 The Kingdom of the Vandals and Alans in 526 AD | |||||||||||||
| Capital | Hippo Regius 435–439[1] Carthage 439–534[2][3] | ||||||||||||
| Common languages | Latin(spoken by elite and clergy) Vulgar Latin andAfrican Romance(spoken by common people) Vandalic(spoken among elite) Punic(spoken among common people) Alanic(spoken among Alanic elite) Numidian(spoken among common people in rural areas) Medieval Greek(spoken among common people) | ||||||||||||
| Religion | Arianism (among elite) Nicene Christianity thenChalcedonian Christianity | ||||||||||||
| Government | Pre-feudal Monarchy | ||||||||||||
| King | |||||||||||||
• 435–477 | Gaiseric | ||||||||||||
• 477–484 | Huneric | ||||||||||||
• 484–496 | Gunthamund | ||||||||||||
• 496–523 | Thrasamund | ||||||||||||
• 523–530 | Hilderic | ||||||||||||
• 530–534 | Gelimer | ||||||||||||
| History | |||||||||||||
| 435 | |||||||||||||
• Conquest by theByzantine Empire | 534 | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
TheVandal Kingdom (Latin:Regnum Vandalum) orKingdom of the Vandals and Alans (Latin:Regnum Vandalorum et Alanorum) was a confederation ofVandals andAlans, which was abarbarian kingdom established underGaiseric, a Vandalic warlord. It ruled parts ofNorth Africa and theMediterranean for 99 years from 435 to 534 AD.
In 429 AD, the Vandals, estimated to number 80,000 people, had crossed by boat fromHispania to North Africa. They advanced eastward, conquering the coastal regions of what is nowTunisia, andAlgeria. In 435, theWestern Roman Empire, then ruling North Africa, allowed the Vandals to settle in the provinces ofNumidia andMauretania when it became clear that the Vandal army could not be defeated by Roman military forces. In 439, the Vandals renewed their advance eastward and capturedCarthage, the most important city of North Africa. The fledgling kingdom then conquered the Roman-ruled islands ofMallorca,Sicily,Sardinia, andCorsica in the western Mediterranean. In the 460s, the Romans launched two unsuccessful military expeditions by sea in an attempt to overthrow the Vandals and reclaim North Africa. The conquest of North Africa by the Vandals was a blow to the beleaguered Western Roman Empire, as North Africa was a major source of revenue and asupplier of grain (mostlywheat) to the city ofRome.
Although primarily remembered for thesack of Rome in 455 and their persecution ofNicene Christians in favor ofArian Christianity, the Vandals also supported the continued construction of educational institutions in their kingdom. According to historianRichard Miles, North Africa hosted "many of the most innovative writers andnatural scientists" of the lateLatin-speakingWestern Roman Empire.[4]
The Vandal Kingdom ended in 534, when it was conquered byBelisarius in theVandalic War and incorporated into theEastern Roman Empire. The surviving Vandals either assimilated into the indigenous African population or were dispersed among the Byzantine territories.[5]
TheVandals, under their new kingGaiseric (also known as Genseric or Geiseric), crossed to Africa in 429, beginning theVandalic conquest of Roman Africa.[6][7] Although their numbers are unknown and some historians debate the validity of estimates, based onProcopius's assertion that the Vandals and Alans numbered 80,000 when they moved to North Africa,[8]Peter Heather estimates that they could have fielded an army of around 15,000–20,000.[9] According to Procopius, the Vandals came to Africa at the request ofBonifacius, the military ruler of the region.[10] However, it has been suggested that the Vandals migrated to Africa in search of safety; they had been attacked by a Roman army in 422 and had failed to seal a treaty with them. Advancing eastward along the African coast, the Vandalslaid siege to the walled city ofHippo Regius in 430.[6] Inside,Saint Augustine and his priests prayed for relief from the Arian Christian invaders, knowing that the fall of the city would spell conversion or death for many Nicene Christians. On 28 August 430, three months into the siege, the 75-year-old St. Augustine died[11] — perhaps from starvation or stress, as the wheat fields outside the city lay dormant and unharvested. After 14 months, hunger and disease were ravaging both the city's inhabitants and the Vandals outside the walls. The city eventually fell to the Vandals, who made it their first capital.[1]Peace was made between the Romans and the Vandals in 435 through a treaty betweenValentinian III and Gaiseric, giving the Vandals control of coastalNumidia and parts ofMauretania. Gaiseric chose to break the treaty in 439 when he invaded the province ofAfrica Proconsularis andlaid siege toCarthage.[12] The city was captured without a fight; the Vandals entered it while most of the inhabitants were attending the races at thehippodrome.[citation needed] Gaiseric made it his capital and styled himself the King of the Vandals andAlans, to denote the inclusion of his Alan allies into his realm. ConqueringSicily,Sardinia,Corsica,Malta, and theBalearic Islands, he built his kingdom into a powerful state.Averil Cameron suggests that the new Vandal rule may not have been unwelcome to the population of North Africa, as the previous landowners were generally unpopular.[13]
The impression given by sources such asVictor of Vita,Possidius,[14]Quodvultdeus, andFulgentius of Ruspe was that the Vandal takeover of Carthage and North Africa led to widespread destruction. However, recent archaeological investigations have challenged this assertion. Although Carthage'sodeon was destroyed, the street grid remained the same, and some public buildings were renovated. The political centre of Carthage was Byrsa Hill. New industrial centres emerged in towns during this period.[15] Historian Andy Merrills uses the large amounts ofAfrican red slip ware discovered across the Mediterranean that date from the Vandal period of North Africa to challenge the assumption that the Vandal rule of North Africa was a time of economic instability.[16] When the Vandals raided Sicily in 440, the Western Roman Empire was too preoccupied with war inGaul to react.Theodosius II, emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire, dispatched an expedition to deal with the Vandals in 441, but it progressed only as far as Sicily. The Western Empire, underValentinian III, secured peace with the Vandals in 442.[17] Under the treaty, the Vandals gainedByzacena,Tripolitania, and part ofNumidia and confirmed their control ofProconsular Africa.[18]
Part ofa series on the |
|---|
| History ofAlgeria |
_et_du_Royaume_de_F%25C3%25A8s.jpg) |
|
|
|
Modern times |
Historians sinceEdward Gibbon have seen the capture of North Africa by the Vandals and Alans as the "deathblow"[19] and "the greatest single blow"[20] to the Western Roman Empire in its struggle to survive. Prior to the Vandals, northern Africa was prosperous and peaceful, requiring only a small percentage of the Roman Empire's military forces, and was an important source of taxes for the empire and grain for the city ofRome.[20] The scholarJosephus in the 1st century AD said that North Africa fed Rome for eight months of the year, with the other four months of needed grain coming from Egypt.[21]
Part ofa series on the | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| History ofTunisia | ||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg) Africa portal • History portal | ||||||||||||||||||
The Roman need for grain from North Africa may have declined by the 5th century because the population of the city of Rome had fallen, and the number of Roman soldiers had decreased. The treaty in 442 between Rome and the Vandals seems to have ensured that grain shipments continued.[22] However, in terms of halting hostilities between Rome and the Vandals, that treaty was honored more in the breach than in the observance, and the Romans placed a high priority on recovering North Africa and regaining their control of grain from the Vandal Kingdom.[20]
The peace treaty of 442 did not halt Vandal raids in the western Mediterranean. Over the next 35 years, Gaiseric used his large naval fleet to loot the coasts of both the Eastern and Western Empires. AfterAttila the Hun's death in 453, however, the Romans turned their attention back to the Vandals, who were now in control of some of the richest lands formerly ruled by Rome.[citation needed]
In an effort to bring the Vandals into the fold of the Empire,Valentinian III offered the hand of his daughter,Eudocia, in marriage to Gaiseric's sonHuneric when both Eudocia and Huneric were children. However, they had not yet wed when in 455, Valentinian III was murdered by accomplices of the usurperPetronius Maximus, who sought control of the Empire. Maximus immediately married Valentinian's widow, the EmpressLicinia Eudoxia, and he also canceled Eudocia's betrothal to Huneric and married her instead to his own son,Palladius. Diplomacy between Rome and the Vandal Kingdom broke down. Eudoxia wrote a letter to Gaiseric, begging him to come to her aid. Claiming that the broken betrothal between Huneric and Eudocia invalidated his peace treaty with Valentinian, Gaiseric sacked Rome, rescuing Eudoxia, Eudocia, and Eudoxia's younger daughterPlacidia (the latter was married to the future unrecognised emperorOlybrius). Maximus and Palladius were killed by an angry mob while fleeing the city.[citation needed]
The chroniclerProsper of Aquitaine[23] offers the only 5th-century report that on 2 June 455, PopeLeo the Great received Gaiseric and implored him to abstain from murder and destruction by fire, and to be satisfied with pillage. The Vandals departed with countless valuables, including the spoils of theTemple in Jerusalem booty brought to Rome byTitus. Eudoxia and her daughters were taken to Carthage,[18] where Eudocia married Huneric shortly thereafter.[citation needed]
The sack of Rome earned the Vandals association with senseless destruction through the nounvandalism.
The Vandal sack of Rome, piracy in the Mediterranean, and the Roman need to recover control of the grain trade made the destruction of the Vandal Kingdom a priority for the Roman Empire. TheWestern Roman EmperorMajorian began to organize an offensive in the summer of 458. A maritime force staged fromCartagena inHispania would takeMauretania and then march onCarthage, while a simultaneous assault, commanded by Marcellinus, would retake Sicily. The Emperor assembled his fleet in 460, but Gaiseric learned of the impending assault and "put a scorched earth policy into effect in Mauretania – scouring the land and poisoning the wells in advance of the planned imperial offensive." In addition, Gaiseric led his own fleet against Majorian's force anddefeated the Romans at Cartagena.[24][20]
In 468, both the Western and Eastern Empires attempted to conquer Africa again with the "most ambitious campaign ever launched against the Vandal state." Primary sources suggest that the fleet numbered 1,113 ships and carried 100,000 men, but this figure has been rejected by modern historiography, with Heather suggesting 30,000 troops and 50,000 soldiers and sailors combined, based on 16,000 Roman soldiers conveyed on 500 ships in 532. Andy Merrills and Richard Miles have asserted that the operation was undoubtedly extensive and "deserves admiration for its logistical brilliance."[25] At anaval battle inCape Bon,Tunisia, the Vandals destroyed the Western fleet and part of the Eastern fleet through the use offire ships.[17] Following up the attack, the Vandals tried to invade thePeloponnese but were driven back by theManiots at Kenipolis with heavy losses.[26] In retaliation, the Vandals took 500 hostages atZakynthos, hacked them to pieces, and threw the pieces overboard on the way back to Carthage.[26]
In the 470s, the Romans abandoned their policy of war against the Vandals. The WesternGermanic generalRicimer reached a treaty with the Vandals,[17] and in 476 Gaiseric was able to conclude a "perpetual peace" with Constantinople. Relations between the two states assumed a veneer of normality.[27] From 477 onward, the Vandals produced their own coinage, although it was restricted to bronze and silver low-denomination coins. Although the low-denomination imperial money was replaced, the high-denomination was not, demonstrating in the words of Merrills "reluctance to usurp the imperial prerogative".[28]
Gaiseric died on 25 January 477, 88 years of age. According to the law of succession which he had promulgated, the oldest male member of the royal house was to succeed. Thus he was succeeded by his sonHuneric (477–484), who at first tolerated Nicene Christians, owing to his fear of Constantinople, but after 482 began to persecuteManichaeans and Nicenes.[29] He also murdered many rival members of the Vandalic dynasty.[30] The nativeBerbers of North Africa who were kept in line during Gaiseric's rule soon began revolts and invasions against the Vandals following Gaiseric's death and Huneric's strict religious laws. The Vandals started rapidly losing territory in modern-day western Algeria to theKingdom of Altava, and by the end of Huneric's rule he completely lost control over theAurès Mountains to kingMasties, who established thekingdom of the Aurès in 483–484.[30][31]
Gunthamund (484–496), his cousin and successor, sought internal peace with the Nicenes and ceased persecution once more. Externally, Vandal power had been declining since Gaiseric's death; Gunthamund lost large parts of Sicily toTheodoric'sOstrogoths and had to withstand increasing pressure from the nativeBerbers, who raided everything inland up to the coast.[32]
Gunthamund's successorThrasamund (496–523) was a religious fanatic and hostile to Nicenes, but he contented himself with bloodless persecutions.[29] In 510 the Frexenses Berber tribe under king Guenfan seized a portion of territory south ofThugga and established theKingdom of the Dorsale, pushing the Vandals further out of inland.[33] Around the 510s, migratingLaguatan berbers under kingCabaon capturedOea (modernTripoli) andSabratha and established a kingdom there, and began sacking Vandalic territories and destroyed various Vandalic settlements.[33] Thrasamund attempted to crush him and retake his territory, but theexpedition in 523 ended in a disastrous Vandalic defeat.[34] He also allied with theVisigoths, but despite this alliance, Thrasamund failed to aid Theoderic when theByzantine Navy ravaged the coast of southern Italy, preventing him from coming to the assistance of KingAlaric of theVisigoths in theBattle of Vouillé, which contributed to Alaric's defeat.[35]
Thrasamund's successorHilderic (523–530) was the Vandal king who was most tolerant ofTrinitarian Christians. He granted religious freedom, and consequently Chalcedonian synods were once more held in North Africa. However, he had little interest in war and left it to his nephew Hoamer. When the Vandals and the Berber Frexes tribe came into conflict yet again, Hoamer suffered a decisive defeat by the Frexes led by Guenfan and his sonAntalas.[33] Following this, theArian faction within the royal family led a revolt, and Hoamer's cousinGelimer (530–534) became king. Hilderic, Hoamer, and their relatives were thrown into prison. In 533, Hilderic was executed when the Byzantine army approached Carthage.[36]
.jpg)
Byzantine EmperorJustinian I declared war, with the stated intention of restoring Hilderic to the Vandal throne. While an expedition was en route, Gelimer's brotherTzazo led a large part of the Vandal army and navy toSardinia to deal with a rebellion by theGothic noblemanGodas. This enabled the armies of the Byzantine Empire, commanded byBelisarius, to land unopposed 10 miles (16 km) from Carthage in the Summer of 533.[38] Gelimer quickly assembled an army[39] and met Belisarius at theBattle of Ad Decimum. The Vandals were prevailing until Gelimer's brother Ammatas and nephew Gibamund fell in battle. Gelimer then lost heart and fled. Belisarius quickly took Carthage as the surviving Vandals fought on.[40]
On December 15, 533, Gelimer and Belisarius clashed again at theBattle of Tricamarum, some 20 miles (32 km) from Carthage. Again, the Vandals fought well but broke, this time when Tzazo fell in battle. Belisarius quickly advanced toHippo, second city of the Vandal Kingdom. In 534 Gelimer, besieged at Mount Pappua by theHerulian GeneralPharas, surrendered to the Byzantines, ending the Kingdom of the Vandals and paving the way forByzantine North Africa.
The Vandals' territory in North Africa (which is now northern Tunisia and eastern Algeria) became a Byzantine province. The best Vandal warriors were formed into five cavalry regiments, known asVandali Iustiniani, and stationed on thePersian frontier. Some enteredthe private service of Belisarius.[41] Gelimer himself was honourably treated and granted large estates inGalatia, where he lived to be an old man. He was also offered the rank ofpatrician but refused it because he was not willing to convert from Arianism to Nicene Christianity.[29] In the words of historianRoger Collins: "The remaining Vandals were then shipped back to Constantinople to be absorbed into the imperial army,"[39] As a distinct ethnic unit they disappeared, either by fleeing to Spain or by being absorbed into the population of North Africa.[42]
From their invasion of North Africa in 429 onward, the Vandals, who were predominantly followers ofArianism, persecutedNicene Christians. This persecution began with the unfettered violence inflicted against the church during Gaiseric's invasion, but, with the legitimization of the Vandal Kingdom, the oppression became entrenched in "more coherent religious policies."[43] Victor of Vita'sHistory of the Vandal Persecution details the "wicked ferocity" inflicted against church property and attacks against "many… distinguishedbishops and noble priests" in the first years of the conquest; similarly, Bishop Honoratus writes that "before our eyes men are murdered, women raped and we ourselves collapse under torture."[44][45] Citing these and other corroborating sources, Merrills has argued that there is "little doubt" that the initial invasion was "brutally violent."[46] He has also argued along withRichard Miles that the Vandals initially targeted the Nicene Church for financial rather than religious reasons, seeking to rob it of its wealth.[45]
Once Gaiseric secured his hold over Numidia and Mauretania in the treaty of 435, he worked "to destroy the power of the Nicene church in his new territories by seizing thebasilicas of three of the most intransigent bishops and expelling them from their cities."[47] Similar policies continued with the capture of Carthage in 439 as the Vandal king made efforts to simultaneously advance the Arian church and oppress Nicene practices. Heather notes that four major churches within the city walls were confiscated for the Arians, and a ban was imposed on all Nicene services in areas in which Vandals settled; Gaiseric also hadQuodvultdeus, Bishop of Carthage, and many of his clergy exiled from Africa and refused "to allow replacements to be ordained… so that the total number of Nicene bishops within the Vandal kingdom suffered a decline."[43] Laymen were excluded from office and frequently suffered confiscation of their property.[48]
However, diplomatic considerations took precedence over religious policy. In 454, at the request of Valentinian III, Gaiseric installedDeogratius as the new Bishop of Carthage, a position that had been left empty since Quodvultdeus's departure. Heather argues that this accession was intended to improve Vandal–Roman relations as Gaiseric negotiated the marriage of his son Huneric to the Princess Eudocia.[49] However, after Valentinian was killed and Vandal relations with Rome and Constantinople worsened, Gaiseric renewed his oppressive religious policies, leaving the bishopric empty once again when Deogratius died in 457.[citation needed]
Heather argues that Gaiseric's promotion of the Arian church, with the accompanying persecution of the Nicene church, had political motivations. He notes a "key distinction" between "the anti-Nicene character" of Gaiseric's actions in Proconsularis and the rest of his kingdom; persecution was most intense when it was in proximity to his Arian followers.[43] Heather suggests that Arianism was a means for Gaiseric to keep his followers united and under control; wherever his people interacted with Nicenes, this strategy was threatened. However, Heather also notes that "personal belief must have also played a substantial role in Gaiseric's decision making."[43]
Huneric, Gaiseric's son and successor, continued and intensified the repression of the Nicene church and attempted to make Arianism the primary religion in North Africa; indeed, much of Victor of Vita's narrative focuses on the atrocities and persecutions committed during Huneric's reign.[50] Priests were forbidden to practice the liturgy,Homoousian books were destroyed, and almost 5,000 clergy were exiled into the desert.[51] Violence continued with "men and women… subjected to a series of torments includingscalping,forced labour andexecution by sword and fire."[51] In 483, Huneric issued a royal edict commanding all Chalcedonian bishops in Africa to attend a debate with Arian representatives. In the aftermath of this conference, he forbade Nicene clergy from assembling or carrying outbaptisms orordinations and ordered all Nicene churches to be closed and Nicene property confiscated.[51] These churches were then turned over for the royalfisc or for Arian clerical use.[citation needed]
While primary sources reveal little about Gunthamund's religious policies, existing evidence does suggest that the new king was "generally better disposed towards the Chalcedonian faith than his predecessor [Huneric] had been" and maintained a period of tolerance.[52] Gunthamund ended the desert exile of a bishop calledEugenius and also restored the Nicene shrine of Saint Agileus in Carthage.[52]
Thrasamund ended his late brother's policies of tolerance when he ascended to the throne in 496. He reintroduced "harsh measures against the Catholic ecclesiastical hierarchy" but "worked to maintain positive relations with the Romano-African lay elite," his intention being to split the loyalties of the two groups.[52]
Except for Hilderic, most Vandal kings persecuted Nicenes (as well asDonatists) to a greater or lesser extent, banning conversion for Vandals and exiling bishops.[53][54]
The administration of the Vandal Kingdom bears a close resemblance to the Roman provincial administration of Africa. While it was staffed by local Africans, the currency and taxation system were a creative adaptation of Roman models and were similar to those administered by the Romans. Vandal troops were also fashioned similarly to the Roman model. Power and wealth in the Vandal state were led by a military landowning aristocracy, and the political elite replaced and expropriated the largely absentee senatorial aristocracy. Other main sources of income included its takeover of the major grain and oil export region of the Romans, which had hitherto been the source of food for the major city of Rome. The wealth that the Vandal leaders accumulated was spent on luxurious town houses and religious buildings, according to literary sources and archeology.[14]
Most people who lived in the Vandal Kingdom prior to the Vandal arrival mostly considered themselves Roman. The Vandals were a minority of the population.[55]
The state of the economy overall is hard to assess. The Vandals did not create any gold coins, but taxes were increased to primarily pay for expanding the army. Trade did continue with pottery being exported but at lower levels. Whether grain shipments to Rome continued is unknown. In the 5th century, there was a decline in trade across the Mediterranean as well.[56]
When arriving in Africa, the Vandals confiscated land held by senators and gave the land to themselves. Those who had their land confiscated ended up keeping their rights. Those who lived in the territory prior and were wealthy kept their wealth and power.[56]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Yet, they were the minority in their kingdom. The majority of the population in the Vandal Kingdom considered themselves Romans and looked forward to the day of restoration of the Empire.
Media related toVandal Kingdom at Wikimedia Commons