Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Valley Link

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proposed hybrid rail line in northern California, US

This article is about a proposed California rail line from the San Francisco Bay Area to the San Joaquin Valley. For other similarly named rail services, seeValley Rail.
Valley Link
Overview
StatusIn planning
OwnerTri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority
LocaleTri-Valley/NorthernSan Joaquin Valley
Termini
Stations4
Websitehttps://www.valleylinkrail.com/
Service
TypeHybrid rail
Operator(s)San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission
Depot(s)Mountain House Operations and Maintenance Facility
Rolling stockBattery electric multiple units
Technical
Line length26[1] mi (42 km)
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in)standard gauge
Route map

future phase to
North Lathrop
Mountain House Operations
and Maintenance Facility
Mountain House Community
Southfront Road
Isabel
Dublin/​Pleasanton
Bay Area Rapid Transit
This diagram:

Valley Link is a proposed 26-mile-long (42 km)hybrid rail line inNorthern California, which seeks to connect therapid transitBay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system in theSan Francisco Bay Area with the northernSan Joaquin Valley via theTri-Valley region.[2] Since 1997[update], BART'sBlue Line's eastern terminus is atDublin/Pleasanton station on the border ofDublin andPleasanton. Valley Link seeks to extend rail service east from here into the northern San Joaquin Valley overAltamont Pass, which would help alleviatetraffic congestion and reducegreenhouse gas emissions onInterstate 580 (I-580). The project resulted from various failed proposals to extend the Blue Line east toLivermore.[3]

The line would run within the median ofInterstate 580 (I-580),right-of-way of thefirst transcontinental railroad owned byAlameda County, and new right-of-way inSan Joaquin County.[1] It is being planned by theTri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority, aspecial-purpose district body formed for the sole purpose of its planning. Valley Link is ultimately planned to run between Dublin/Pleasanton station and theAltamont Corridor Express’s (ACE) futureNorth Lathrop station utilizingstandard-gaugezero-emission trainsets. The initial operating phase is proposed to be the line between Dublin/Pleasanton station and Vasco Road, with the segments toMountain House Community station and North Lathrop in the San Joaquin Valley being reserved for future planning. This segment is as of June 2025[update] in planning, with construction to begin as early as 2028.[4]

History

[edit]
Stereoscopic image of theWestern Pacific Railroad summit tunnel at Altamont Pass,c. 1869

About 12 miles (19 km) of thefirst transcontinental railroadright of way through theTri-Valley andAltamont Pass, originally established in 1869 by theold Western Pacific Railroad, wasdeeded toAlameda County bySouthern Pacific Railroad in 1984. This historic 1869 route featured a Summit Tunnel, 1,200 feet (370 m) long, blasted and dug by Chinese laborers.[5] TheAltamont Commuter Expresscommuter rail service, which began between Stockton and San Jose in 1998, uses the other Union Pacific right of way that goes overAltamont Pass, established in 1908.

TheWestern Pacific Railroadright of way (center and right) through theAltamont Pass, whichAlameda County acquired in 1984. The route of theAltamont Corridor Express is the track higher in elevation on the left.

A similar plan to rundiesel multiple unit trains across Altamont Pass was proposed by BART in 2003, though it comprised a larger service area (continuing north along theIron Horse Regional Trail, a formerSouthern Pacific right-of-way).[6]

In 2017, citing lack of interest from theBay Area Rapid Transit District in bringing BART service directly toLivermore, the Livermore City Council proposed a newly established local entity to undertake planning and construction of the extension,[7] which was also recommended by the California State Assembly Transportation Committee.[8] Assembly Bill 758 was signed byGovernor of CaliforniaJerry Brown on October 13, 2017,[2] formally establishing the Authority.

On May 24, 2018, the BART board voted against a fullrapid transit BART build or abus rapid transit system to extend service east fromDublin/Pleasanton station.[3] This prompted the new Rail Authority to initiate planning of a new transit system.

A final feasibility report was released in October 2019. The buildout cost to North Lathrop was estimated at between $1.88 billion and $3.21 billion, with an expected start of operations between the second quarter of 2027 and the fourth quarter of 2028.[9] Scott Haggerty, one of the founders of the TVSJVRRA, noted that the popularity of the project was reflected in the volume of public comments to the feasibility report.[10] A draftenvironmental impact report was released in December 2020.[11] The final environmental impact report was approved by the board in May 2021, allowing the rail authority to proceed with design and continue seeking funding for the project.[12]

By 2023, the locally preferred alternative had the line utilizing the I-580 median and Western Pacific alignment until realigning with I-580 north of the Summit Tunnel and continuing east to Mountain House.[13] Selection of the alternate Mountain House station location and alignment east of Altamont Pass forced the agency to redo part of the EIR.[14] By 2024, service was proposed to start in 2035.[15]

Cost estimates for the first phase of construction had reached $4.4 billion by 2025, more than double from a few years earlier. The board voted that June to truncate the first phase of construction to the segment between Dublin/Pleasanton and Vasco Road. Construction could start as soon as 2028.[4]

Rail service

[edit]

Valley Link is a plan to utilizezero-emission trains along the formerfirst transcontinental railroadright-of-way through theAltamont Pass and in theInterstate 580 median through the city of Livermore. Trains would initially run 26 miles (42 km) from theDublin/Pleasanton station to Mountain House Community station, with intermediate stations at Isabel and Southfront Road.[16] Weekday service would connect to every other BART train at Dublin/Pleasanton.[17]

The developer ofRiver Islands has offered to cover the cost of station construction in exchange for the ability to build atransit village at the site.[18]

TheSan Joaquin Regional Rail Commission agreed to operate the service in 2020.[19]

Funding

[edit]

Funds previously allocated to BART to construct a Livermore extension were forfeited to this authority by July 1, 2018, amounting to at least $145 million.[3] Funding for the feasibility study was provided variously byCaltrans,Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the San Joaquin County Council of Governments.[20] By February 2019, more than $588 million had been accumulated for the project.[21] In 2020, the project gained a further $400 million from reallocated BART funds.[22] In 2023, the state ofCalifornia awarded the project $25 million.[23]

Stations

[edit]
Trains will terminate atDublin/Pleasanton station, seen here in 2017, and connect toBay Area Rapid Transit trains.

The following are initial planned stations along the route:[13]

StationLocationConnections
Mountain House CommunityTracy
Southfront RoadLivermore
Isabel
Dublin/PleasantonDublin/PleasantonBay Area Rapid TransitBART:Blue Line
Bus transportAmtrak Thruway,County Connection,RTD,StanRTA,WHEELS

Rolling stock

[edit]

In 2018,Stadler met with the governing board to discuss traction sources;diesel multiple unit or diesel/battery electrichybrid vehicles were envisioned to serve the route.AECOM was contracted to perform a feasibility study for the project that same year.[20] Theloading gauge of highway underpasses limits the selection of rolling stock.

Hydrogen trains were initially selected as the line's rolling stock.[24][25][26] With an increase in the price of hydrogen, plans changed in 2025 to utilizebattery electric multiple units.[4]

Further phases are planned to extend the line north toLathrop andStockton.Infill stations at Ellis and Grant Line Road may be added in the future.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Get Valley Linked!".Valley Link Rail Project.Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024.
  2. ^ab"AB-758 Transportation:Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority". RetrievedOctober 17, 2017.
  3. ^abcBaldassari, Erin (May 24, 2018)."BART rejects Livermore expansion; mayor vows rail connection".East Bay Times. RetrievedMay 25, 2018.
  4. ^abcBrownne, Bob (November 21, 2025)."Valley Link connection to SJ County delayed as cost projections increase". Tracy Press. RetrievedDecember 19, 2025.
  5. ^Chang, Gordon H.; Fisher Fishkin, Shelley, eds. (2019).The Chinese and the Iron Road; Building the Transcontinental Railroad. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. p. 291.ISBN 978-1503608290.
  6. ^Cabanatuan, Michael (June 13, 2003)."BART ponders eastern extensions / Planned routes call for unfamiliar trains".SF Gate.
  7. ^Angela Ruggiero, Angela Ruggiero (April 11, 2017)."Livermore says BART board doesn't care, wants local control".Vallejo Times-Herald. RetrievedMay 23, 2017.
  8. ^Matthews, Sam (April 28, 2017)."Closer to a BART connection".Tracy Press. RetrievedJune 2, 2017.
  9. ^"Valley Link Final Feasibility Report"(PDF).Dropbox.Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. RetrievedOctober 17, 2019.
  10. ^"Valley Link Feasibility Report approved byTri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Board".Mass Transit. October 14, 2019. RetrievedApril 1, 2020.
  11. ^"Environmental report drafted for Valley Link passenger-rail project".Progressive Railroading. December 8, 2020. RetrievedDecember 18, 2020.
  12. ^"Valley Link Board approves environmental report for rail project".masstransitmag.com. May 13, 2021. RetrievedJuly 21, 2021.
  13. ^ab"Adoption of a Locally Preferred Alternative for Evaluation in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Clearance"(PDF).Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. April 12, 2023. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 29, 2023. RetrievedMay 24, 2023.
  14. ^Holland, John (May 23, 2024)."See latest plan for passenger rail from North Valley to Bay Area, every 12 minutes at peak".Modesto Bee. RetrievedJuly 9, 2024.
  15. ^"Chapter 2: Project Description".Valley Link Draft SEIR(PDF) (Report).Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. April 2024. p. 2-29. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on July 9, 2024. RetrievedJuly 9, 2024.
  16. ^Matthews, Sam (July 27, 2018)."Light rail system selects downtown station".Tracy Press. RetrievedJuly 28, 2018.
  17. ^"Project Concept".ACE to BART.Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. Archived fromthe original on May 30, 2018. RetrievedMay 29, 2018.
  18. ^Wyatt, Dennis (June 23, 2018)."VALLEY'S 1ST TRANSIT VILLAGE?".Mantecca Bulletin. RetrievedJuly 1, 2018.
  19. ^Wyatt, Dennis (February 12, 2021)."Rail Commute".Turlock Journal. RetrievedFebruary 14, 2021.
  20. ^abMcNicoll, Ron (June 21, 2018)."Rail to BART Completes Study Funding".The Independent. RetrievedJuly 17, 2018.
  21. ^Matthews, Sam (February 15, 2019)."High-speed rail bombshell may be good news for Valley Link".Tracy Press. RetrievedFebruary 28, 2019.
  22. ^"Funds reallocated to Valley Link Project".Mass Transit. September 29, 2020. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2020.
  23. ^Wyatt, Dennis (April 27, 2023)."State awards Valley Link $25 million".Manteca Bulletin. 209 Multimedia. RetrievedFebruary 19, 2024.
  24. ^"Hydrogen Feasibility Study".Valley Link Rail.Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. RetrievedJanuary 15, 2023.
  25. ^"Valley Link Advances Vision to be Nation's First Passenger Rail System to Operate on Self-Produced Green Hydrogen Fuel"(PDF).Valley Link Rail.Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. RetrievedJanuary 15, 2024.
  26. ^"Transportation's next frontier: Building the nation's first passenger rail system powered with green hydrogen".San Francisco Business Journal. American City Business Journals. August 31, 2023. RetrievedFebruary 19, 2024.

External links

[edit]
Stations
Future
Route
Projects
Current lines
Rapid transit
Hybrid rail
Automated guideway transit
Stations
Alameda County
Oakland
Planned (2031)
Contra Costa County
San Francisco
San Mateo County
Santa Clara County
Planned (2036)
Infrastructure
History
General
managers
Other
Planned stations are initalics
Rail
Ferry
Major bus
Minor bus
Regional bus
Entities
Major
stations
San Francisco
Oakland
San Jose
Major historical
services
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valley_Link&oldid=1328293055"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp