User talk:Zzz111zzz
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Welcome!
Hello, Zzz111zzz, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such asGod 21 Project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia'sguidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read calledYour first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to theNew contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type{{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check outWikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Acroterion(talk)04:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onGod 21 Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.Acroterion(talk)04:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onZorek Richards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.Acroterion(talk)04:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleZorek Richards is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorek Richards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.RL0919 (talk)06:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to be blunt but a work in progress is not a valid response to a CSD request. It is perfectly understandable that it takes some time to pull an article together, but if the first posting to main space will not meet the minimum requirements, you should start the article in a user subpage.
I've taken the liberty of moving the page to a user subpage.
You can find it here:User:Zzz111zzzGod21 Project
You can work on the article at your own pace, then move it into main space (or ask me to move it if you ar not yet able to.) If this does not work for you, let me know and I'll delete it.--SPhilbrickT13:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your ownpersonal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did toMichelle Obama. Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.Loonymonkey (talk)15:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pleasestop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did atMichelle Obama. Content of this nature could be regarded asdefamatory and is in violation ofWikipedia policy. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.Loonymonkey (talk)15:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onMichelle Obama. Users are expected tocollaborate with others and avoid editingdisruptively.
In particular, thethree-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you continue to edit war, youmay beblocked from editing without further notice.Further, note that Obama-related articles are under special probation where even 3:RR may not apply.Loonymonkey (talk)15:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What would be the purpose of editing be if I thought I was wrong? You have not added ANY verifiable evidence to suggest your comments about her are RIGHT. The links are to liberal publications and are NOT neutral.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.Kubigula(talk)22:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.