User Page	Talk Page	Notes	Library	Commons	Wikisource	Sandboxes	Userspace	Contributions

Archives

1,2,3,4,5,6

This user is busy inreal life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you very much for the support with my article about Ilias Psinakis! If you have a time, please keep supporting it.LanaSimba (talk)00:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Helping to make wikipedia a better place. Keep up all the good work!CrazyAces489 (talk)19:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	reward for a job well done!CrazyAces489 (talk)14:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you !Fylbecatuloustalk02:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WordSeventeen,
MERRYCHRISTMAS!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk |contribs |guestbook)

This message promotesWikiLove. Created byNahnah4 (talk |contribs |guestbook).

Thanks!WordSeventeen (talk)10:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

WordSeventeen,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.Fylbecatuloustalk13:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Thank you for your message to me about my articles at Vikidia. I am now editing there a bit. All the best this coming year!Fylbecatuloustalk13:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!WordSeventeen (talk)10:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WordSeventeen,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk |contribs |guestbook)09:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message promotesWikiLove. Created byNahnah4 (talk |contribs |guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Thanks!WordSeventeen (talk)10:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate inthe request for comment onTalk:Roy Moore. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please seeWikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atfeedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Bob Simon.Legobot (talk)00:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Bill Cosby.Legobot (talk)00:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg.Legobot (talk)00:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank so much for the barnstar!!!Megalibrarygirl (talk)18:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned aboutthis edit. Not that you made it but that you felt it necessary to make it. Seethis edit and thetalk page fall out. The only thing that these two pages have in common is that they were both edited by Kbabej. --PBS (talk)20:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Deaths in 2015.Legobot (talk)00:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you were formatting some Google books citations. You may already be aware of it, but if you are not I think you might findhttp://reftag.appspot.com a useful tool. You will find some other tools atWikipedia:Wikimedia Labs/Toolserver replacements and more atWikipedia:Tools --PBS (talk)16:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. I use that reftag one as well as one athttp://tools.wmflabs.org/yadkard/yadkard The second one gives both a plain as well as named reference citation. Thanks for the links, I will check them out.WordSeventeen (talk)17:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that link. I did not know about it. It's going into my collection on my notes page. --PBS (talk)11:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey WordSeventeen

I see you edited my page. Any other suggestions for my article? I am new to wiki and would love adviceThank youzzynat231 (User talk:zzynat231) — Precedingundated comment added03:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello zynat231,

It is always good to include as many references from reliable sources as possible. Check here if you are not sure.WP:RS I will keep an eye on the article and try to find a few more sources as well. Welcome to Wikipedia by the way! If you ever need help with anything here, please feel free to stop by and ask. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)03:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Los Angeles City Attorney.Legobot (talk)00:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you very much for the support with my article about Ilias Psinakis! If you have a time, please keep supporting it.LanaSimba (talk)00:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, support the article herethe page for discussion, if you can. I am not very good with technical issues in Wiki..LanaSimba (talk)02:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Paul Singer (businessman).Legobot (talk)00:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The wheel is one of the most famous and useful inventions in thehistory of technology Hello, WordSeventeen. The following is WikiProjectToday's articles for improvement's weekly selection: History of technology Previous selections:Garbage picking •Antagonist Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by:MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofEuroCarGT (talk)00:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC) •Opt-out instructions[reply]

Can you give an example of the information that is repeated.Nightscream (talk)04:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thank you Nightscream, for instance on theKim Kardashian article please see the tables for TV, filmography and awards. Then the prose in the article has these several statements that give the same information contained in the table.

Occasionally there may be an extra item or some bit of info, but most of these below are the same info:

• Kardashian played Elle in four episodes of the television series Beyond the Break.
• .....and guest judge on America's Next Top Model in August of that year.
• In October 2007, Kardashian, in addition to her mother Kris; her step-father Bruce; her siblings Kourtney, Khloé, and Rob; and half-sisters Kendall and Kylie began to appear in the reality television series Keeping Up with the Kardashians.
• she made her feature film debut in the disaster film spoof Disaster Movie, in which she appeared as a character named Lisa.
• Kardashian made a cameo appearance during an episode of the sitcom How I Met Your Mother, in the episode "Benefits"

It just goes on and on like that through this whole article and many others in the group. Plus please note there are inline citations in the prose, and then the tables with what appears to be the same reference.

Thank you for looking this over, Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)01:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw earlier people putting pinging people on afds for those who put up the notability tag which I did that on a article that I didn't realize that many people put one up.Wgolf (talk)02:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think it be a problem, so yeah I'll stop. (I've just seen it done by others so I thought it wasn't a big deal-though after one article I was thinking it might be too much)Wgolf (talk)02:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice that you say sorry. But who was the user that added the references that you refer to when you said

"Well the blp prod was removed since it got refs" hmmm? Did you ping or notify that editor? Can you tell me the name of the editor? You seem to be overall a good editor @Wgolf but I do not understand your brevity when you approach these articles that you consider for deletion. Have you ever considered trying to improve an article now and then? Or maybe help a new editor to fix a ref that they found, but it just was not formatted correctly? For example today I came across an article today where you had reverted an edit where the person did not have the ref formatted correctly atJagdeo Prasad. Here is the diff, if you are interested in what I saw on the page when I looked up this " 05:08, April 7, 2015‎ Wgolf (talk | contribs)‎ . . (2,573 bytes) (-583)‎ . . (ref does not exist) " Before you reverted the edit[1], after you reverted the edit[2]

If you look closely at the reference it appeared like a bare url on the page. It looked like this:

http://www.countercurrents.org/ayadav020211.htmhttp://www.countercurrents.org/ayadav020211.htm

The editor just probably pasted it twice. If you just click on that it will give you a 404, but the ref does exist. Just erase he duplicate url, and you will go straight to the page the editor was trying to use as a reference.

Of course you are not really required to do any of this. But as for me, my goal is to help to improve the encyclopedia, improve articles, occasionally create articles, and try to help others who may not know how to do that one little thing that could help them to improve the articles. What are your goals here at wikipdia Wgolf? Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)02:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear WordSeventeen!Thank you for reviewing my articleShahram Qadir and I appreciate it. You have left a tag which required a more reliable source for biography. I have already proven sources for this short biography, both in English and Farsi. And on External Links section I put once more IMDb as information source for this person's biography which is the same information on magazines that I have referred to as sources. I will be grateful if you review once again my article and if it is possible remove the tag. Best regards Wikipedia 14:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byIranian Cinematographers (talk •contribs)

Thanks for leaving a comment at AfD for the above article. However, I want to let you know that I changed myKeep vote toDelete vote after I reviewed the article again following a recent addition of sources that established the subjectnotability. In lieu of this your comment per my initial vote may no longer valid, perhaps you should consider to take a look. Thanks!Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£}18:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know of any help pages. That is not because they may not exist it is just that I do not know of any. How to build a simple family tree is described in the documentation totemplate:chart. There is also the oldtemplate:familytree which is nowdeprecated in favour of{{chart}} which seems to have the same documentation. You may also like to look incategory:family trees to see some more complicated examples.

If they are templates then they are often collapsed with{{navbox}}. See for exampleTemplate:Family tree of William Jardine (1784-1843) which also shows how to include citations within such a template.

If you want to isolate the footnotes for the chart you can do it using this:

{{chart top|An example family tree}}<center>{{tree chart/start}}{{tree chart| | | |GrMa |~|y|~| GRP | |GrMa=Grandma{{efn-lr|A first class citation}}|GRP=Grandpa}}{{tree chart| | | | | | | |)|-|-|-|.| }}{{tree chart| | | MOM |y| DAD | |DAISY|MOM=Mom|DAD=Dad|DAISY=[[Aunt Daisy]]}}{{tree chart| |,|-|-|-|+|-|-|-|.| | | }}{{tree chart| JOE | | ME  | | SIS | | |JOE=My brother Joe|ME='''Me!'''|SIS=My little sister}}{{tree chart/end}}|- |style="text-align: left;"|'''Notes:'''{{notelist-lr}}<!--- use either {{Efn-lr}} and/or <ref group=lower-roman /> To fill this notelist --></center>{{chart bottom}}

produces this:

I hope that helps. --PBS (talk)10:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Mark Ghuneim.Legobot (talk)00:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment reYitang Zhang.Sca (talk)14:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly are quite welcomeSca Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)15:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, in light of having been attacked in so many different directions. I thank you for your award.CrazyAces489 (talk)20:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Word! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)21:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Damat Ibrahim Pasha.Legobot (talk)00:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Helping to make wikipedia a better place. Keep up all the good work!CrazyAces489 (talk)19:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. We all need to support each other. Collaboration is more successful when everyone lays off the personal attacks. They are not fun and are quite unnecessary. Good to see you back CrazyAces489! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)23:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HelloUser:WordSeventeen sorry for disturbing you. The reason I am writing you is we all love Wikipedia and we want it expanding. However there is a discussion going on to delete a notable game article because of biased opinions. I saw that you edited this article:Dokapon_Ikari_no_Tekken and let it stay for further expansion, update and keep growing Wikipedia even though it has no references. But I am also totally agree with you to let articles stay for improvements and expand Wikipedia. So I believe you are a neutral, professional, objective and who believes in expanding Wikipedia not shrinking it type of person. So I would like you to check out this discussionWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MonsterMMORPG_(2nd_nomination) and make your comment based on references it has. References are hereTalk:MonsterMMORPG. Please feel free to delete my message to you after you read it. Thank you very much have a nice day.176.233.41.152 (talk)14:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneWordSeventeen (talk)17:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Brian Sylvestre.Legobot (talk)00:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response and kind words.Kolforn ♣ 07:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Please let me know if you have any questions. You may feel free to post any questions here on my talk page. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)08:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did take notice of your improvements to the article. It is greatly appreciated. Feel free to improve any article I created. All the best.

CrazyAces489 (talk)05:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Done Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)17:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Twice!SmokeyTheCat06:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)16:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Aaron Schock.Legobot (talk)00:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Winkelvi.C2.A0.28edit_.7C_talk_.7C_history_.7C_links_.7C_watch_.7C_logs.29 / You may be interested in this...All About That Bass (A word?? /Stalking not allowed...)16:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)16:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Elizabeth Warren.Legobot (talk)00:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my judgementUser:Winkelvi was out of order to accuse you of acting in bad faith for bringing an RfC. However if you were to open anWP:ANI over the second bad faith posting byUser:Winkelvi toTalk:Simon Collins#RFC regarding a passage, given the information I posted to you pagehere, there is a strong possibility that it would partially boomerang on you, as Winkelvi is making the point, witht some empirical evidence, that your are targeting pages which Winkelvi has recently edited.

I suggest that you let this RfC play out and takemy advise. I will not sanction Winkelvi for the second bad faith posting, because to do so could be seen as vindictive by me. You are of course free to take it up at ANI, but I think thatthis andthat give more than enough information for uninvolved editors who come to comment at the RfC to draw their own conclusions, without the need for further administrative action. If Winkelvi continues to play the man and not the ball (to draw on a soccer analogy) then then referee cards may need to be produced (to continue the analogy). --PBS (talk)11:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for a quick response. I will certainly take your words under advisement. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)11:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving a note on my article, Mullingar Town Park! Much appreciated!Yours faithfully,TheShaunster (talk)12:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so muchCrazyAces489! I always enjoy collaboration with responsible, honest, caring editors whose main goal is the same as mine, which is to work on improving all of the articles, create new articles as time allows, and work with other hard working collaborative editors such as yourself to tidy up references, and do any minor copyediting needed so that we may together improve the encyclopedia! Word! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)20:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Franklin D. Roosevelt.Legobot (talk)00:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should have received a red ping, but for the record and in case you did not seeUser talk:Winkelvi#Talk:Simon Collins.23RFC regarding a passage --PBS (talk)07:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention to the matter! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)07:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you are already awareuser:Winkelvi deleted my comment to you on this talk page. The message thatuser:Winkelvideleted fromuser talk:Winkelvi to which I was directing you was:

--PBS (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks PBS, for standing up for what is right. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)12:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Meghan Trainor.Legobot (talk)00:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wonder if you can help, as I appear to have come to an impasse because nobody from the martial arts site has yet responded, which is very unusual as they are usually extremely keen and quick to jump on things. Anyhow, I need to clear up a source question issue that I asked onhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fumiaki_Shishida as it affects other aikido articles, therefore, I appealed for help to clear up the question of, is the sourcehttp://www.aikidojournal.com/encyclopedia.php?entryID=612 listed in the fumiaki shisida article sound ? The question is raised in so much as the source states that shishida is " Currently a member of the Board of Directors and a technical director of the JAPAN AIKIDO ASSOCIATION." And when this statement was used recently in an update of another aikido article, then the update was readily undone and the reason given for its undoing was that it was incorrect information. The question isn't about the undoing of an update as I have no issue with the update being undone, but in the action of the undoing of the update for that reason it raises the question of, if the information is indeed incorrect, then thehttp://www.aikidojournal.com/encyclopedia.php?entryID=612 source is not a sound source and its inclusion therefore, in the fumiaki shisida article and any of the other wiki article is questionable. But if the source is sound and the statement is correct, then there can be no objection with both the source and the update remaining.Chunlinc (talk)07:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not removemaintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has beenreverted. Thank you. Ormr2014 | Talk 13:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You left a terse note here reprimanding me for removing maintenance templates from an article without correcting the problems here[4] I did not remove any templates. I made two formatting edits and a third edit to fill a bare reference. The maintenance templates were clearly still there as evidenced in the diff above. It looks like the next editor may have removed the templates. Please look more closely at the diff before accusing editors in the future. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)15:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bit redundant, as you left the same message on myTalk Page. The revision history indicates that you did indeed remove the maintenance tags. See theRevision History Ormr2014 | Talk 15:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the revision history showed the tags missing after your initial edit, butUser:Papeli44 has taken credit for the removal and I owe you an apology. Ormr2014 | Talk 15:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing a duplication in categories.

Mitzi.humphrey (talk)14:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I creat this page but i write the title wrong. William S. D. Daniel (the"S" and "D" should change their place). Can you repair it. Thank you.

William S. D. Daniel (wrong)William D. S. Daniel (TRUE)

--Gabygabi (talk)07:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)07:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should have received a red ping, but for the record and in case you did not seeUser talk:Winkelvi#Talk:Simon Collins.23RFC regarding a passage --PBS (talk)07:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention to the matter! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)07:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you are already awareuser:Winkelvi deleted my comment to you on this talk page. The message thatuser:Winkelvideleted fromuser talk:Winkelvi to which I was directing you was:

--PBS (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks PBS, for standing up for what is right. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)12:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WordSeventeen,

Thank you for taking the time to advise me on my articles. Your assistance was greatly appreciated and I have taken the steps necessary to bring the articles into compliance (I think!) Thanks again!TGCJKS197276 (talk)21:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've archived my talk, which edit conflicted with the message I was trying to send. Although I disagree with it (for the reasons in the other posts), I will self-revert, if only to maintain the peace.Joseph2302 (talk)23:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)23:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thanks for your work atJames Rhodes (pianist). Some articles are more "trying" than others, I know. It may help if you lay out the specific issues you see with the text that the IP keeps inserting. At a glance, it doesn't look too far off to me. The IPs method of editing (edit warring, walls of unformatted text on talk, etc) is not okay, but if you can provide some guidance at the talk page perhaps we can all find some copy we're satisfied with.

Also, since the material is now sourced in a couple reliable independent sources, it is possible that an admin won't grant the BLP exemption toWP:3RR. I recommend that you stop reverting as well (if the IP puts the content back) and instead use the talk page to come up with something reasonable. Someone will come along and look at the edit warring so far, and you don't want to be participating.

Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk)03:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)04:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PerWP:BLPSOURCES any editor can delete unsourced claims and biographical material as I did atUttam Bandu Tupe. I'll wait a bit to see what you're planning to do with it, but please do not revert again, in accordance wih theguideline policy cited above.Brianhe (talk)05:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being most reasonable. I will complete adding all the references and citations by the end of this business week. I have been delayed because my other three folders of research on this author are at my office. I do also have several add on articles to also post. Frankly, I was glad to remember about the article because I had prepared a grand expansion. I have been so busy lately that I had completely forgotten about the whole affair! I do hope you do not find me rude in reverting the good faith deletions you had done, but it was much quicker than re-adding the info back one by one. I appreciate your patience and collaboration on the project, and I hope to encounter you again sometime. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)08:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you de-prod the ABC page? I discussed it with our team and we do not want to be associated with Wikipeda.RobertABC — Precedingundated comment added21:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I moved the article to Draft space, instead of deleting it--you will find it atDraft:Angie Littlefield I notice, however, that , according to WorldCat, none of this books are in mote than 60 libraries, which is utterly trivial for a children's author, and seems incompatible with his having won a significant prize that might make for notability. DGG ( talk)02:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help and advice! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)02:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJogti has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dicdef

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. DGG ( talk)19:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected it toDevadasi to avoid deletion. If that's not the exact meaning, it can be restored & expanded, or expanded at the Devadashi article. DGG ( talk)14:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DGG for your assistance! Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)22:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThe Man who Married a Mountain has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think particularly notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. DGG ( talk)19:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

redirected to author, similarly. I assume these two are not part of a group of paid edits; if they are, you need to declare it. DGG ( talk)14:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DGG. No, I try to do a set of 3-5 articles that link, so the articles won't get the dreaded orphan tag. I write abut a variety of different subjects including skyscrapers, beauty queens and pageant winners, and trying to do a few articles about war vehicles and military history things. I last picked several writers that had won awards and such. I also have done a few articles about various people in the Rockefeller family. My interests vary. I appreciate your note, there is no paid editing here. Cheers!WordSeventeen (talk)22:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you've suggested a merge betweenList of cricketers who have taken five wickets on ODI debut andList of Test cricketers who have taken two five-wicket hauls on debut, but only tagged one of the articles, and not given a reason for it?Joseph2302 (talk)00:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiWordSeventeen, many thanks for reviewing and approving the article for Jo Loves (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo_Loves). I would like to add information to the article; if I do does the entire article run the risk of being rejected, or will the addition/amendment be reviewed separately without affecting the rest of the page? If so, how can I ensure that the reviewer considers the recent edit only? Sincerely grateful for your advice!Teriw (talk)11:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PmI'm not making any comments on what's been going on, but your constant invalid warnings are verging on harassment. Stop, and wait for the AN/I resultsamtar^{t}17:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, WordSeventeen. In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structureddiscussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However,requests for comment,third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. Thedispute resolution noticeboard exists as a first point of call for disputes that are not resolved by discussion, and theMediation Committee provides formal mediation for advanced content disputes.

In all cases, you should reviewWikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see theArbitration Policy and theGuide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate tocontact a member of the community if you have more questions. Miniapolis00:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of6 months for Your continuous slowmotion disruption on Allie X related articles combined with your frivolous but severely worded warnings on Sanctuary's talk page makes it clear that atm your presence doesnt benefit wikipedia.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by first reading theguide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kevin Gorman (talk)21:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

WordSeventeen(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I started an RFC in good faith at one of the AlliX articles. I then left to go to our sunday church supper. I returned to check wikipedia and found the postings of the admin. He had posted a note on the rfc giving me two separate suggestions about what he thought I should do. Please remember that we all live in various time zones, plus we have different activities, work, school, religious activities. I never even got an opportunity to take one of the suggestions left for me to consider. The admin blocked me for 6 monthe like 2-3 hours after he left the note with two suggestions. I would like to be unblocked so I may continue trying to improve wikipedia and help build a better encyclopedia. In spirit ofWP:AGF and to prevent any percieved disruptions that anyone might believe are going on, I will voluntarily put myself on three month topic ban on articles about AllieXWordSeventeen (talk)05:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I looked at the discussions. On the one hand, consensus had not closed for a block andKevin Gorman's block was a bit of a blunt instrument, but on the other, you did yourself no favours by badgering on ANI, and continuing to editAllie X while the topic ban was under consideration. So on conclusion I think Kevin's block was good. You need to spend time away from Wikipedia and do something else; when your block expires in 6 months, don't goanywhere near Allie X - ever, otherwise the next block will be indefinite.Ritchie333^(talk)(cont)16:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Angie Littlefield, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been included in a SPI report. Please see here.[6] I thought you should know so you may defend yourself if you care to. deja vuJilllyjo (talk)05:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing forabusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts areallowed, but using them forillegitimate reasonsis not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bansmay be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by first reading theguide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk)13:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WordSeventeen. It has been over six months since you last edited yourArticles for Creation draft article submission, "Henry Ademola Adeola".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}} or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Onel5969^{TT me}21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleZulva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zulva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Chiro725 (talk)20:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]