User talk:WikiEditor668
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.Alexander Levian (talk)03:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.
The full report is atthe edit warring noticeboard. Thank you,EdJohnston (talk)01:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by settingPreferences →Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.Thanks!UW Dawgs (talk)13:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did toUniversity of California, Los Angeles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use thesandbox for that. Thank you.UW Dawgs (talk)13:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop addingunsourced content, as you did toBoston University. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy onverifiability. If you continue to do so, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.UW Dawgs (talk)13:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did toUniversity of California, Los Angeles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use thesandbox for that. Thank you.UW Dawgs (talk)02:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SeeTalk:Battell Chapel. -Nunh-huh18:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, WikiEditor668. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before you start reverting and especially deleting sections of the article and it's valid sources you should first discuss it. Second, you should not claim that the sources say one thing when they say something completely opposite of your claim...such as claiming that AKC and DACA do not acknowledge the origin of Dalmatian to Dalmatia. To quote AKC:Many AKC breeds have obscure and disputed origins, none more so than the Dalmatian. Researchers have used ancient artifacts and writings to support theories placing the Dal’s birth in the British Isles, Europe, North Africa, and Asia.There is no doubt, however, that by the early 1800s the breed was closely associated with a swath of Central Europe along the Adriatic Sea, the region once known as Dalmatia. So this is a quote directly fromAKC website on Dalmatian. DACA says next:Authoritative writers place him first as a positive entity in Dalmatia, a province of Austria on the Eastern shore of the coast of Venice....He has been a dog of war, a sentinel on the borders of Dalmatia and Croatia. From DACA website calling upon AKC directlyseen here. So what exactly are you talking about when you say AKC and DACA don't acknowledge Croatia (and its historical region of Dalmatia) as the place of origin? I'd really like to know...but it is a rhetorical question really to be honest. Furthermore the only international authority on breeds is in fact FCI and FCI acknowledges Croatia as country of origin since 1999 officially, meaning Croatia also has patronage over the breed on international level by automatism. FCI also cites several quite old sources such as chronicles (from early 18th century) of Bishops Petar Bakic and Andreas Keczkemety, Book ofThomas PennantSynopsis of Quadruped published in 1771, Book ofThomas BewickA General History of Quadrupeds published in 1790, etc. etc. Now I will ask you politely to stop deleting sourced content from the article and stop pushing your POV i.e edit-warring for whatever reason you are doing it.Shokatz (talk)03:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did atErwin Rommel.Binksternet (talk)19:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, WikiEditor668. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Wellertalk08:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did atDemocratic socialism, you may beblocked from editing.Your removal of the sourced text was also a violation ofWP:NPOV.Doug Wellertalk08:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAlfonso Ribeiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAfrican. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |