Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Wanchope16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This isWanchope16'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Your submission atArticles for creation:Manuel Arroyo (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk)11:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello,Wanchope16!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Greenman (talk)11:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Giuliano Avaca (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk)11:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion ofBautista Stavile

[edit]
Notice

The articleBautista Stavile has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

FailsWP:NRU and more importantlyWP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Rugbyfan22 (talk)18:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofBautista Stavile for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBautista Stavile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bautista Stavile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rugbyfan22 (talk)19:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan de Leeuw moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions toDylan de Leeuw. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability andit is really a promising page, but one source is not enough to establish notability as 2nd does not lead anywhere related to the subject, and 3rd sources is just passing mentions. Feel free to notify me when draft is improve with more sources..I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.dxneo (talk)13:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedItaly A national rugby union team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFilippo Drago. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Santiago Ruiz (rugby union)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wanchope16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Santiago Ruiz (rugby union), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)23:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Santiago Ruiz (rugby union)

[edit]

Hello, Wanchope16. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Santiago Ruiz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!22:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Wanchope16. Thank you for your work onDavid Odiase.North8000, while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with~~~~.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk)15:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'mLouisOrr27. I noticed that you recentlyremoved content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurateedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.LouisOrr27 (talk)20:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofGiuliano Avaca for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleGiuliano Avaca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuliano Avaca until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)20:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofRiccardo Genovese for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRiccardo Genovese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riccardo Genovese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)18:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRugby Rovigo Delta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBrandon Thompson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Giuliano Avaca

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wanchope16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Giuliano Avaca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)20:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofGiacomo Milano for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleGiacomo Milano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)07:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofAlessandro Ortombina for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAlessandro Ortombina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Ortombina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)22:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofGiacomo Milano

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onGiacomo Milano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.JTtheOG (talk)22:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofJadin Kingi for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJadin Kingi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jadin Kingi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)22:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofGiacomo Milano for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleGiacomo Milano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)23:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Giuliano Avaca

[edit]

Hello, Wanchope16. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Giuliano Avaca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Hey man im josh (talk)20:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofManuel Arroyo for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleManuel Arroyo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Arroyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)02:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofLuca Franceschetto for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLuca Franceschetto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Franceschetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)03:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofGiacomo Milano

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onGiacomo Milano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.JTtheOG (talk)22:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the block. I created pages on professional rugby player ,with official caps, in Tier 1 competition.
Please, give me a reason on deletion of page.Wanchope16 (talk)07:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofAlessandro Gesi for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAlessandro Gesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Gesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)22:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofDylan de Leeuw for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDylan de Leeuw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan de Leeuw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk)22:38, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofAlessandro Ortombina

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onAlessandro Ortombina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Ortombina. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.JTtheOG (talk)22:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofJadin Kingi

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onJadin Kingi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jadin Kingi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.JTtheOG (talk)21:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the block. I created pages on professional rugby player ,with official caps, in Tier 1 competition.
Please, give me a reason on deletion of page.Wanchope16 (talk)07:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofAlessandro Gesi

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onAlessandro Gesi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Gesi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.JTtheOG (talk)00:23, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion ofAlessandro Ortombina (rugby union)

[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

The pageAlessandro Ortombina (rugby union) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, such as atArticles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.CoconutOctopustalk21:14, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I created pages on professional rugby player ,with official caps, in Tier 1 competition.
Please, give me a reason on deletion of page.Wanchope16 (talk)07:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing certainnamespaces ((Article)) for repeatedly recreating pages post-deletion without any discussion or acknowledgement..
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CoconutOctopustalk21:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand the block. I created pages on professional rugby player ,with official caps, in Tier 1 competition.
Please, give me a reason on deletion of page.
Thank youWanchope16 (talk)07:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You repeatedly recreated pages that had been deleted by community consensus (i.e. atWP:AfD) which is disruptive. It's fine to create an article for a topic previously deleted, but not to simply repost the exact content that was removed.CoconutOctopustalk08:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I created pages for active and professional rugby players with a career in progress and opened to updating. I don't understand the reason.Wanchope16 (talk)08:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please read through the notices on your talk page. You've been informed multiple times that you are recreating articles that were deleted via discussion, with links to the relevant discussion. When an article is deleted via discussion, this means a consensus has been reached that the subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Therefore, before recreating the article, you need to look at the relevant discussion, then make sure you address the concerns raised. Continually recreating articles deleted via discussion is disruptive.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)00:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry I don't understand because I didn't create disinformation or gossip.
I think that I ever follow the basis of Wikipedia with a purpose of providing universal knowledge in a fast, collaborative and accessible way.
Attidudes like yours have only a disctructive function.
RegardsWanchope16 (talk)20:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw your request at AN to get unblocked. In as short as possible, it is disruptive to go against decisions made by a consensus.
For a detailed breakdown, here is an example: Giacomo Milano. You appear to have created the article back in 2024. InWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano, the article was soft deleted in November 2024. Then, it appears that you recreated the article around December 2024, against the normal process for undeletion. InWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giacomo Milano (2nd nomination), the article was deleted in December 2024. Then, it appears that you once again recreated the article sometime around February 2025, against the consensus from the second discussion. This lead to the article being deleted yet again in February 2025 and protected against additional recreations.
The subjects of articles should pass our notability requirements before articles are created on them. (SeeWikipedia:Notability for more details.)
The reason you got blocked seems to be because of the consensus atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Ortombina and your recreations. The article for Alessandro Ortombina was deleted in December 2024 after discussion, redeleted in February 2025 after improper recreation, redeleted and protected against recreation in July 2025, and the redeleted under the new name 'Alessandro Ortombina (rugby union)' this month. That last one implies that you understood that you couldn't recreate the article at Alessandro Ortombina, so you added an improper disambig to the end of the article so that it could be recreated.
I advise that you reread the block notice that was left as it does explain what you need to do to get unblocked.Repeated recreation of deleted pages: no evidence of ever checking user talk page. Can be unblocked if they acknowledge this and promise to avoid the same behaviour. You have indicated multiple times that you don't understand why you were blocked, so I would advise reviewing the comments made to you from earlier and our policies. (In particular, I believe you should readWP:IDHT, as linked to byWikipedia:Don't ignore community consensus.) --Super Goku V (talk)00:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wanchope16&oldid=1318116422"
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp