You know who I am, so please no nice messages. I'm over it.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Therecent edit you made toUser:TheNeo-AustrianManifesto has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use thesandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informativeedit summary. You may also wish to read theintroduction to editing. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord²10:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I promise it won't happen again.-VulgarKeynesianMilitarism (talk)11:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Therecent edit you made toCredit crunch constitutesvandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use thesandbox for testing. Thank you.Willking1979 (talk)22:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't. NJGW reverted Sunday's good faith edits. Then Sunday kept reverting - in bad faith. Look at the history. And look at Sunday's edits. They are amateurish.

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you shouldsign your posts by typing fourtildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk)07:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're pretty obviously someones sock, and suspected of being the sock of a banned user, so I've blocked you. Please complain belowWilliam M. Connolley (talk)11:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Complain about what? About the absolute rank stupidity of the whole ridiculous game? Zealot-Zombies who block those they hate for no good reason have no ability to think clearly. They know not what they do...