User talk:Uyvsdi
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Uyvsdi has not edited Wikipediasince August 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| ||||||||||
Hi. Thanks for all you do for Indigenous pages. Can you take a look at the page forLarry Spotted Crow Mann and see whether you think I have effectively removed "fan-like" language? many thanksSsenier (talk)15:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedDeadose, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesSan Gabriel River andKichai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedRick Rivet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEuropean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! In case you are interested, there is a discussionhere aboutWilliam Penn's 1683treaty with the Lenape Indians, and specifically whetherVoltaire's famous quote ("...a treaty never written, never broken") from his 1764Dictionnaire philosophique was incorrect. If you have time, your input would be appreciated. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk)11:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pertaining to the Nomlaki article. The two people of note are not Paskanta. That's all I am making sure of. That they do not get affiliated with Paskanta.LunchboxCFD
If you're going to make accusations, back them up. You speak of a "frenzy" of moving articles. Which articles? I mentioned two of them, and gave my reasons; are there any others you mean? —kwami (talk)21:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't answer the question. I could say you should be banned because[this]. Presumably whatever I have a problem with is in there somewhere, but how are you supposed to know where? How am I supposed to respond if you won't say what the problem is? The list you link to is full of redirect creation, spelling corrections, punctuation corrections, etc. In the past month, precisely three moves have been challenged: One (Halkomelem) where per BOLD I reverted an undiscussed move by Skookum, and then reverted again; one (Parnkalla), where I rejected the idea that "Parnkala" was the language and "Parnkalla" the people (or something equally spurious), and the original mover accepted my correction; and one (Bosnian pyramids) where everyone agreed the article needed to be moved, but we ended up choosing a slightly different wording. So I've committed a *single* edit-warring move in the past *month*. That requires a ban? I don't get it. You've moved articles in a disputed context, as you admit in the discussion. Should you be banned too for contributing to the problem? What are the criteria here? —kwami (talk)18:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toMattole may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)03:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedMattole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHumboldt County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedMattole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBear River (California) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You might be interested in the discussion of a new title forChickamauga Wars (1776-1794). You have contributed to the article in the past. Your thoughts would be appreciated atTalk:Chickamauga Wars (1776–94)#Requested move. —ℜob C.aliasALAROB20:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toPicayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)03:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Indigenous Peoples of North America for aSignpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day.–Mabeenot (talk)22:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Portal:Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Indigenous peoples of the Americas and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofPortal:Indigenous peoples of the Americas during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Mercurywoodrose (talk)01:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi -
Saw your name on my watchlist - does this mean you have returned to WP? Hope so. This is incredibly late notice for you, but we are doing a wikithon on Native literatures tomorrow (Thursday 12th) at Isleta Pueblo. I presume there's no way that you could attend, but I would very much welcome any and all suggestions you might want to make to improvethe project page for the event, or suggest other articles that should be worked on.Vizjim (talk)22:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson Rancheria Casino Resort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk)19:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ᎣᏏᏲ! Updated a few pages today with material from theCherokee Phoenix, and discovered a batch of recently added one-word articles about stars and planetary moons. Are these articles legitimate? --Djembayz (talk)03:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| A Boywas Born |
|---|
Music in your ears and heart! (in abox, for QAI members) --Gerda Arendt (talk)12:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Uyvsdi - I am reaching out to you because I am helping to plan and organize Indigenous Peoples' Day programming during WikiConference 2016 and I think your feedback about our direction would be very valuable. If you are interested, perhaps I can share our vision and what we have planned to date? Input during the conference from Wikipedia users who focus on these projects and adding this content is also an important piece of this. Thanks!Kellyjeanne9 (talk)21:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge andWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the currentWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa.00:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 | You are invited to participate in the50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to theUnited States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See morehere! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Uyvsdi,
I wanted to let you know that I just taggedYora for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.
Zazzysa (talk)19:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Uyvsdi, I'm requesting your opinion going on here[2] in the section called "Clean Up". Thank you for your time.Mcelite (talk)00:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your fantastic work in creating/improving articles on indigenous peoples.I was so thrilled to stumble upon the article Photography by Indigenous Peoples. Well done!Shameran81 (talk)06:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Uyvsdi, I don't know if you are active or even check your Wikipedia anymore but I wanted to, first of all, thank you for all of your contributions. Secondly, I wish that you are still active because I could utilize your experience and expertise. I would love to have someone to brainstorm with on Indigenous people's articles and especially those about Cherokee. You seem as rooted and resolute as myself when there are so many who allow the wind to carry them. I do hope I hear from you. Where ever you are may Great Spirit watch over you.Tsistunagiska (talk)14:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Mint Tea |
| Thank you for your edits!Iris the Bard (talk)08:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
.jpg) | 7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you aDobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread theWikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎)16:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd appreciate your input on this topic to resolve some long disputed issues about modern Taino movements.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Taíno#Request_for_Comment_on_Modern_Taino_IdentityPoketama (talk)23:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Qwerfjkltalk09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Indigenous leaders of the Americas has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)21:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Circum-Caribbean tribes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)01:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleKorubo (disambiguation) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to thepage's history for further information.DatBot (talk)00:31, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
