I am around, just much less than before. You may see me here andthere.

Hi UnpetitproleX! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages ontalk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!I dream of horses(Contribs)(Talk)18:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you were trying to add a notice to your old account @Unpetitprole but that theedit filter was blocking you so I have added it on your behalf. Hope this helps,DigitalChutney (talk)18:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalChutney: Thank you very much. I have also archived the talk page and added a notice on the talk page, I hope that is fine. —UnpetitproleX (talk)18:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! Good luck with your new account,DigitalChutney (talk)19:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGovernment Museum and Art Gallery, Chandigarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSobha Singh. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromPanjab University intoDraft:List of Colleges affiliated to Panjab University, Chandigarh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —Diannaa (talk)23:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is the only time I have copied content, since this is the first draft page I’ve created. I’ll provide attribution for it.

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedShalimar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageShalimar Gardens.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted asvandalism and have beenreverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, pleasecite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article'stalk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use yoursandbox.Wildhorse3 (talk)00:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The information added by me atDaf is neither incorrect, nor unsourced.--UnpetitproleX (talk)00:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest inIndia,Pakistan, andAfghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Wildhorse3 (talk)00:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedWestern Himalayas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pagePaddy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All talk page discussions get archived after some time. Please look for the archive boxes in the header. If there isn't one, go to the Page menu at the top and you can access subpages.

You have been involved withTalk:Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus for only three days, and you are rehashing all the issues that have been discussed in depth in the past. But you are raising the discussion to high pitch. Please follow the normal decorum required of all participants. You know that the topic is contentious, and you know about ARBIPA sanctions. --Kautilya3 (talk)12:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. Please do not accuse me of “raising the discussion to high pitch.” I’ve been having the discussion at a very normal pitch. It isme on the other hand, who is being threatened with administrative action on the talk page and then these threats are being scrubbed out by the user who threatened me. Thanks again.UnpetitproleX (talk)12:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTourism in India by state, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageManali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSindhis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageShikarpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKinnaur district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKalpa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Palace of Assembly Chandigarh 2006.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus17:48, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mFowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toKashmir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use yoursandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse. perWP:BRD please make a case for your bold removal of text that has been in the article for many years and thereafter garner a consensus for it. You have also been making remarks about motivations in edit summaries.@RegentsPark,El C,Abecedare,SpacemanSpiff,Vanamonde93,DrKay,Bishonen, andDoug Weller:. Best regardsFowler&fowler«Talk»17:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afterdeleting large amounts of text and refs (‘BOLD’?), and then completely deleting several sections (‘BOLD’?)per my “excellent suggestion”—for which I also suggest wider consensus (seetalk page discussion)—both cases of “removal of text that has been in the article for many years”, this talk page post with ping to eight admins.UnpetitproleX (talk)20:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also,BRD states “Revert an edit if it is not an improvement, and only if you cannot immediatelyrefine it.” But your history of reverting my edits only to then immediately follow up with edits that eitherfollow the same reasoning, or are simple modifications—some to shorten,others to expand my words (butonly after first reverting my edit), something that in all possibility is not intentional or in bad faith, has me tired. The usual follow up with addition of refs that support what I am, and then you are, trying to say, is much appreciated. I do not want to point fingers, I’massuming good faith and ruling out a problem but if there is indeed a problem then please do message me here on my talk page, but preferably without pinging one, two or eight administrators. I’m only trying to improve the articles, which is overwhelmingly clear from my contributions. And judging from your edits, you’re also trying to do the same, which is why I’m forgoing a post on your talk page.UnpetitproleX (talk)20:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated your edit, which I thought was well done. I disagree with both of you that the history before the Sikh Empire was unnecessary. But I didn't mind that content to be gone because it was poor. If and when I get time, I will be writing new content for the sections that got deleted. --Kautilya3 (talk)22:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1.

And the deletion was out-of-process. Unpetitprole was explicit that such a deletion must be guided by local consensus.TrangaBellam (talk)12:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And might I point out, it all snowballed fromthis rather minor and uncontroversial edit of mine (minor in my opinion, open to examination by others).

In any case, I’d be willing to argue in favour of keeping the article limited largely to 19th century and after, if such a discussion takes place (on the talk page of the article,not here on my talk page).UnpetitproleX (talk)14:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a warning, I think FPC is in one of its slow periods. I've had a lot of images fail that really surprised me, and I think it's just everyone's a bit too busy to vote on everything.

Don't feel discouraged. This happens every so often. Best thing to do is just make a list of things to renominate, and... not stop your nominations, because FPC being dead doesn't help anything - but slow them up a bit.

Hope that helps!Adam Cuerden^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of allFPs}16:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Adam Cuerden: thanks for the words of encouragement, hope you're having a good day! Might I ask though what is this particularly about? Have I made too many nominations? There are currently four active nominations by me (two of which I made today, one earlier nom closes in a few hours and I don’t plan on making any new ones until half of the current ones are closed) which I will admit might be too many. I tend to nominate pictures at once, will try to make them gradually over time. Thanks,UnpetitproleX (talk)17:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I see what you meant. Sorry, thought this was a “warning” warning, I understand now that its meant to be guidance rather than censure. Your advice is much appreciated.UnpetitproleX (talk)17:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And encouragement. As I said, it's a slow month, you're fairly new to FPC, and I don't want you getting discouraged, you know? Sorry if I phrased it badly.Adam Cuerden^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of allFPs}17:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :)UnpetitproleX (talk)17:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Kee monastery Spiti Valley (edited).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user, UnpetitproleX
I have noticed that you reverted my infobox article that originally had crossed post-work 5 edits, i believe this edit was not only biased but a unformal way of reverting it.
You could've told the moderators or administrators of the Wiki article atleast.NameIsShaheer (talk)16:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,@NameIsShaheer: the reason I removed the infobox, as I state inmy edit summary, was that both the population figures and the ethnic groups column were incorrect/insufficient. Looking at it again, the countries column was also incorrect, and there was also a column containing the text “demographics1_info2 = [[Pashto]]<br/>{{small|Minorities: [[Persian language|Persian]], [[Urdu]], [[Hindko]], [[Balochi language|Balochi]], [[Ormuri]], [[Parachi language|Parachi]], [[Pashayi languages]], [[Nuristani languages]]}}” that did not appear because it did not have a column title, I believe it might be leftover from wherever you copied the infobox from. If you would like to add the infobox, I would suggest you make a post onTalk:Kashmir. Regards,UnpetitproleX (talk)17:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, you do need to update your own vote too. Also, you might want to drop a talk page message to all the voters.Adam Cuerden^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of allFPs}22:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! Will do.UnpetitproleX (talk)22:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:MatheranPanoramaPointDrySeasonCrop.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:MatheranPanoramaPointMonsoonCrop.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedChandigarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGovernment of Punjab.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Darcha Padum Road Below Shinku La Lahaul Oct22 A7C 03533.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus20:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently been editingIndia,Pakistan, andAfghanistan, which has been designated acontentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Wellertalk10:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to nuke an article covering 3000 casualties, hanging by the coattails of WP:N is obviously not the way to go about it. You need to check the levels of coverage in contemporary newspapers, emphasize on the non-unique nature of the events, and write a foolproof nomination statement. I sympathize with your stance but it is wise to accept theblizzard and move on.TrangaBellam (talk)21:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. As I said on the nom, it was foolish of me to not initiate a discussion on the talk page prior. I do plan on creating the train massacres article, and merge it into that. You are welcome to suggest literature that deals specifically with the trains. Thanks.UnpetitproleX (talk)21:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not his fault. He assumed that everybody would know something about the scale of partition violence. But they don't. It is unfathomable. --Kautilya3 (talk)22:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could you please explain which sections of the Bakarwal Genetics section are problematic ? ThanksTomHarry2023 (talk)09:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is written insummary style, with multiple reliable sources to determinedue weight. A large section written entirely with one source, one that’s not widely cited nor finds its content in (m)anytertiary sources, is highlyWP:UNDUE in a compact overview article about an ethnic group.UnpetitproleX (talk)09:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At best it warrants not more than one line summarising what the nature article says, though even that may be too much.UnpetitproleX (talk)09:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isUnpetitproleX. Thank you.Oriental Aristocrat (talk)16:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus16:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the article1947 Rawalpindi massacres you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLingzhi.Renascence --Lingzhi.Renascence (talk)15:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article1947 Rawalpindi massacres you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:1947 Rawalpindi massacres for reasons whythe nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLingzhi.Renascence --Lingzhi.Renascence (talk)00:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Nigeen Lake pano (edited).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus21:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Kardhang Biling Bhaga Dhauladhar Oct22 A7C 04645.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus16:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Holy SURP Hovhannes Church.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus09:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Takht-i-Bahi Buddhist Monastery.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus13:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img08 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img03 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSrinagar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesNational Conference andRanbir Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat - Wall Decorations.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus21:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSheikh Abdullah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSlovak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per admin RegentsPark'spost atTalk:Srinagar, you should declare on your user page that you have had two past accounts (by name) which you had operated at the same time. Best regards,Fowler&fowler«Talk»19:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you are admitting the truth, thatPankykh (talk ·contribs) was you, albeit with elaborate rationalization, after it was dragged out of you. I have a memory like an elephant's. I hope you won't trifle with me lightly in the future.Fowler&fowler«Talk»00:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Off-topic discussion moved fromTalk:Srinagar by me (UnpetitproleX) perWP:TALKOFFTOPIC. I personally do not wish to continue the discussion, but since it has been closed there, it is here for anyone to add to if they want.

I have asked you before and I’m asking you again not to assume my gender. Do not continue to use your assumed gender pronouns for me. Thanks.UnpetitproleX (talk)18:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Carol Gilligan before you make that argument. We have three adult daughters and none are slouches.Fowler&fowler«Talk»19:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please readWP:EDPRONOUNS. I have politely asked you once before, and I am asking you a second time now, to not assume my gender and pronouns.UnpetitproleX (talk)21:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not do it knowingly. I'll try not to do it again, but like I said, please readCarol Gilligan (whom I last ran into in aSainsbury's in Cambridge, England, in 1993) in particular herIn a Different Voice.

Again, we have three adult daughters and none is a slouch.The lady doth protest too much, methinksFowler&fowler«Talk»19:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard for me to believe that you’re not doing it intentionally, given that I the last time I asked you not to do ityou called my request "garbage". You may need to update your understanding ofgender. And congratulations onreproducing having children.UnpetitproleX (talk)18:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@UnpetitproleX: How do you know our daughters are biological and not adopted? You keep making inordinately rude remarks. Please stop the nonsense. Remove those pathetic remarks. I don't mean strike. ProntoFowler&fowler«Talk»12:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see how "congratulations" is an inordinately (or at all) rude response to somebody who is repeatedly telling me they have "three adult daughters." But I can see how repeatedly telling somebody you have daughters who are not slouches and implying through that they are a slouch and they cannot be woman after they have asked you not to use gendered pronouns for them, is rude. Also given yourelephant-like memory, how did you forget not to usegendered pronouns for me afterI explicitly asked you not to, but insult me while at it just as you did the first time?UnpetitproleX (talk)13:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do notremove my responses like you just did.UnpetitproleX (talk)13:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No not strike, or insouciantly and immaturely rewording, "Congratulations on reproducing" to "Congratulations on having children" inyour edit

Please remove them altogether. @El C,RegentsPark,Abecedare, andVanamonde93: what is Wikipedia becoming? Longstanding productive editors have to put up with relentless immature bickering by unknowns?Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @UnpetitproleX: as well. This is the giddy limit.Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been dealing with the recent incidents as I usually do, by trying to ignore the harassment (this and more) and focusing on other things, both irl and here. In terms of the latter, I wrote the wikipedia articles for two of my favourite contemporary Kashmiri singers (him andher; may they both flourish). If I don’t get too busy withreal life commitments, I will expand and update the articles of the other artistes (her,her,her,her and others) whose works I enjoy, before I return to writing that requires more scholarly reading.UnpetitproleX (talk)18:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry you had to bear repetitive foul-mouthed abuse on Wikipedia. The admins are always there to bring down the sword of justice upon such perpetrators (if you really need to >ANI).

If the current rfc passes (the conspicuous lack of participation in which is concerning, pinging @Abecedare to somehow resuscitate the convo with their admin powers), can you start an rfc on replacing the term "Indian-administered" with "Indian", thereby transferring complete sovereignty of the union territories to India on the backing ofGoogle Ngram and Britannica^[1][2]. Nations childishly lay claims on foreign territory and this should not erase the ownership of a nation over its lands, unless of course, a territory and its people are recognised as an independent state by the majority of UN membership (e.g., Palestine) and hence, there is a dispute of government authority over the region (e.g., Israeli-Palestinian conflict). Also, I don't mind the Kashmir conflict/dispute being mentioned in the broader regions/union territories as done in Britannica.Fayninja (talk)14:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

X-administered is the currentWP:NPOV wording for the first-level administrative subdivisions. Of course, the Kashmir conflict is fundamentally different from the Israel-Palestine one. I’m not sure another rfc is on the cards for me. An rfc onTalk:Himalayas (now archived) which gained rough consensus in favour of my proposal, was never actually implemented, partly because the incessant bullying forced me to take some time off.Abecedare said that in case the rfc doesn’t provide us with a resolution, the 2019 wording is the status quo we go to. That isversion A in the rfc.UnpetitproleX (talk)14:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayninja: As for the so far low participation, the RfC can be neutrally advertised, I guess. Acceptable avenues for such advertising would be the talk pages of Srinagar, Leh etc and J&K, G-B, Ladakh etc. Other than that, a ping to those that participated in the 2019 discussion. That’s the most that can be done.UnpetitproleX (talk)14:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's all up to you, boss! I am a little confused about territorialdisputes. Either it's me or others that don't understand the difference betweensovereignty andclaim. If a nation claims a foreign territory, the claimant does not get any military or political power to govern the claimed land (no sovereignty). There is aconflict of power over the West Bank, and so the question of sovereignty undoubtedly arises there but the union territories are legit Indian union territories just like Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu with all power exercised through state institutions. I hope regions of the former Junagadh state don't become "Indian-administered" because of Pakistan's claim. Funny thing, theAustralians seem confused about this as well.Fayninja (talk)16:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayninja:Hmm. Andof course. No wonder it all began after this.UnpetitproleX (talk)16:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have implemented your rfc on the Himalayas, keep an eye on it.Fayninja (talk)03:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKausar Nag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAblution.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen your comments at AE and appreciate that you are offended, hurt even.

Language evolves and, believe me, as we get older (ie: me!) it can be difficult adapting to new usages. Especially so if we aren't much exposed to them in our day-to-day lives. Terms likereaching out,terf,woke, "gender fluid", the "be kind" ethos when used as a put-down, the "cancel culture" from the same people preaching kindness etc leave me cold, I'm afraid. At best, they irritate me, at worst, I really don't know why they exist. I'm sure that if I worked around or lived with teenagers then I would have a better grasp, or if I lived in Brighton, UK, or California. However, for all my inward spluttering and confusion - and indeed for my occasional rant amongst friends - I do recognise change happens, is inevitable.

Tolerance is a two-way street. Both "sides" need to adapt and to accept that none of us are perfect, all of us different. And if one side doesn't adapt/accept then just try to be the better person. I have had to do the latter for most of my 60 years, being bullied and discriminated against regularly, and if not that then having to put up with people who won't or can't accept that my disability is an issue. I am the better person, and if things cannot actually be fixed then at least I can take comfort from that.

I recognise you are offended and that to you it is A Big Deal. It isn't to me and, in truth, while I recognise it is for you, I don't pretend to really understand it. I know a few knights, baronets and peers who don't care whether they are addressed as Sir or Lord etc, which is just as well because I rarely do! But to the best of my ability, and potentially failing memory, I will try to refer to you as you prefer to be addressed. It might help, however, if you added your preferred pronouns to your signature, if only as an aide memoire to fuddy-duddies like me. Or would that be like painting a target on your back? I really don't know: it's a strange thing to witness change and it can genuinely be confusing, frightening even to not be sure if saying x or y is now deemed offensive.

The above is well-intentioned. I guess I have to hope you can see that, through all the verbosity. -Sitush (talk)13:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: Thanks for the comment. I was hoping my statement there was not confusing, but if it was, I should clarify: the issue is not merely any inadvertent use of gendered pronouns (I’m more than willing tonot assume bad intentions there, and did not) as much as the reaction to my requests for gender neutral pronouns. The deluge of condescending and dismissive commentary, and insulting personal attacks, that followed the requests is a big deal (to me, and to those who intervened, I assume). I don’t wish to repeat all those comments, but, at least to my judgment, most, if not all of them, were uncivil and offensive. That said, I certainly do not see any ill intent behind your advice—it is welcome.UnpetitproleX (talk)10:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t ·c)buidhe05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Ancient Temple, Naranag, Jammu and Kashmir, India.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus12:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I have been spending a lot of time reading India-based articles lately and have come across images created by you. Great job!Padurina (talk)21:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Phuktal Gompa Tsarap Zanskar Oct22 A7C 04463.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus07:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Cave Buildings Phuktal Gompa Oct22 A7C 04465.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus18:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi UnpetitproleX, sorry for not responding to the multiple pings you gave from the discussions of this page. It is not possible to fix the lead by directly editing it. Rather, the body needs to be fixed first, which was mostly written by a single editor using Kashmiri Pandit sources, who eventually got blocked. Some of the content in the body is good but with poor quality sources. The rest is not very good. I suggest you focus on improving the body as well as the cited sources. We can eventually get back to the lead after the body is in good shape.

You cannot ignore the sources currently cited in the lead. Rather the multiple viewpoints need to be covered in the body in anWP:NPOV manner. --Kautilya3 (talk)10:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: I have already read most of the sources cited in the lead; Ganguly, Zutshi, Hussain, even Kanjwal. Which is how I can tell what parts from the available literature have been omitted. Prominent scholars of Kashmir such as Chowdhary and Behera seem to have been banned and can't be cited, apparently. I will make a post there soon, I have unfortunately not been able to find the time to do so yet.

As for the body, it is difficult to edit the page in any meaningful way when all edits by me are being reverted in aWP:OWN manner with multitudes ofWP:ASPERSIONS at the talk page.UnpetitproleX (talk)20:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Keylong West Lahaul Himachal Oct22 A7C 03375 panorama.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus20:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here orask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t ·c)buidhe02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary is very unclear on howMOS:INDICSCRIPT applies to a script that does not belong to the family. Other articles not having an Urdu name in infobox is really a very bad reason likewise. It could to wise to have at the least some kind of additional sentence at the given section ofMOS:INDIA but that would require an RfC which I really suggest to be initiated. I mean, MOS:INDICSCRIPT doesn't seriously mention "all non-Latin scripts" but just links "Indic scripts" (which nowhere mentions Urdu or so) and briefly referring them to in the brackets as "Non-latin". My understand is based on the same. It doesn't say "all", and it doesn't say "inclusive of Perso-Arabic/Urdu or so". The only good point you made is "all India related articles", that's fine but my question still stands. Best regards, ─Aafī(talk)18:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I was awaiting a better explanation. I'd appreciate if you could add more. Thank you. ─Aafī(talk)18:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aafi: The explanation really is simple, theWP:NOINDICSCRIPT rule has expanded to includeall non-Latin scripts over the years. Also, after a quick glance over the original2011 discussion, it seems to me that the discussion treated Urdu, written in Perso-Arabic, to be within the scope of the discussion and vote.UnpetitproleX (talk)20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you have appreciated my photos of the Himalayas in the past, FYI at the beginning of June, I spent 10 days in Lahaul and Zanskar. I have uploaded the first batch of photos from this trip. Clickhere for the latest images. Curating and uploading all good images from this trip may take 2-3 months.RegardsTagooty (talk)13:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagooty: Thank you, very thoughtful of you to let me know. Will definitely check them out!UnpetitproleX (talk)22:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Frozen Lake Shinko La Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00315.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus19:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please see akhnoor assembly result bjp won but in detailed results bjp won against bjpclear mistakes in detailed results and please note that others are correctAltocar 2020 (talk)22:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Gonbo Rangjon Shinko La Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00332.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Zanana Kund Aur Galta Ji Ka Mandir - edited.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus14:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Woman lighting the candles for the Festival of Lights in India (cropped).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus13:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2001 Kishtwar massacres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAtholi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi UnpetitproleX,

This is to let you know thatFile:Nigeen Lake pano (edited).jpg, afeatured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia'spicture of the day (POTD) for January 14, 2025. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited atTemplate:POTD/2025-01-14. If you have any concerns, please place a message atWikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!Jay8g[V•T•E]04:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeen Lake is a mildlyeutrophic lake located inSrinagar, in Indian-administeredJammu and Kashmir. It is sometimes considered to be a part ofDal Lake and is connected to it via a narrow strait. Thispanoramic photograph shows the west bank of Nigeen Lake, withhouseboats lining the shore.Hari Parbat, a hill overlooking Srinagar, is visible to the left of centre, and the snow-cappedPir Panjal Range can be seen in the distance. Photograph credit:KennyOMG; edited byUnpetitproleX Recently featured: Fork-tailed flycatcher John Henry Turpin Tocopilla railway Archive More featured pictures

• view
• talk
• edit
• history
• watch
• file page

Wow, that is an awesome picture! Congratulations! --Kautilya3 (talk)01:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have worked on1947 Rawalpindi massacres, perhaps I could interest you to create a page on thePunjab disobedience campaign that preceded it? There seems to be plenty of material available. --Kautilya3 (talk)01:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think 'Punjab disobedience campaign' is too ambiguous, for it could refer to theCivil disobedience movement in Punjab—that's what a google search also suggests. I actually was quite confused about what you meant by it. I'm assuming you meant the Muslim league campaign to oust the Tiwana coalition government. That, imo, belongs to the background section of theRawalpindi massacres article. If expanded into a separate article, it should be titled something else.UnpetitproleX (talk)08:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I missed out "civil" while writing late night. It is a key part of the partition story, and one that resulted in a humongous humanitarian disaster.(You must have watchedEarth (1998 film), which depicts how Punjab changed during that one year.) It needs telling. --Kautilya3 (talk)09:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, When switching date, you should also update the article talk page, i.e.[1]. Thanks,Yann (talk)10:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Apologies, noted for the future. Thanks for updating it.UnpetitproleX (talk)21:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Shiva shrine, Gangabal Lake.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus19:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, great photo, but metadata is partially missing…ArionStar (talk)21:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: It was originally adigital negative converted to aTIFF file for editing usingdarktable, which then generated the edited full resolutionJPEG. In that initial conversion, I guess the metadata was erased. If it is possible to add the metadata manually, I might have to do that later.UnpetitproleX (talk)21:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately just through a new upload.ArionStar (talk)21:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:A smiling member of the Ramnami Samaj (edited).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus18:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Gurudongmar Lake Sikkim, India (edit).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! – 🌻Hilst (talk |contribs)13:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Paro Taktsang, Bhutan (edited).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus15:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Gandhi Bhawan, Chandigarh.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus17:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:NohKaLikai Falls V2 Wiki.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus21:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Phnom Bakheng temple at Angkor, Cambodia.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus22:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Baspa Valley under snow (pano), Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus19:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Shikara - Sukhna Lake - Chandigarh 2016-08-07 (edit).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus01:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:LVM3 M4, Chandrayaan-3 - Launch vehicle lifting off from the Second Launch Pad (SLP) of SDSC-SHAR, Sriharikota (edit).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus12:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Jaipur 03-2016 20 City Palace complex.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus11:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration 02.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus02:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Durgam Cheruvu Panorama.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus04:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Koshuri^(あ!)13:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedChandigarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAditya Prakash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:55, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mKoshuri Sultan. I noticed that you made a comment on the pageTalk:Pajeet that didn't seem verycivil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Koshuri^(あ!)07:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was only talking about behaviour which other editorshave also noticed and noted elsewhere. I have struck that part of the comment which doesn't belong on that talk page.UnpetitproleX (talk)07:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Orientls (talk)15:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article to the version thatyou have yourself stated is half-decade oldWP:STABLE version, which I agree is more of a STABLE version than the other one. I do not plan on making any more edits to it.UnpetitproleX (talk)16:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop misrepresenting me when I have clarified what I meant at the talkpage. SeeWP: POINT.Orientls (talk)16:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Aerial View of Peaks of Khumbu, Ngozumpa Glacier and Gokyo Lakes (crop).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus11:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Valley of flowers national park, Uttarakhand, India 03 (edit).jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus12:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Krishansar Lake, Sonmarg, Kashmir valley, India 01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus03:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted tofeatured picture status Your image,File:Panorama of Himalayas from Ranikhet, Uttarakhand, India.jpg, was nominated onWikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!ArmbrustTheHomunculus04:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourFeatured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination forfeatured picture status,File:Nilgiris Sholur Reflection Bokkapuram Sep22 R16 06402.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atWikipedia:Featured picture candidates.ArmbrustTheHomunculus08:12, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	For nominations of FPs about subjects from under-represented cultures within Wikipedia coverage. — ♠Ixtal(T /C ) ⁂Non nobis solum ♠07:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Pages with missing files