User talk:Unknown FG
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This isUnknown FG'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months  |
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to2024 Indian general election in Sikkim. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)13:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBishan Singh Chuphal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKhanduri ministry.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:56, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toChandra Pant. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)09:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRonnie V. Lyngdoh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNational People's Party.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of parliamentary constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDevsar Assembly constituency.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)20:01, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:57, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toA. K. Sai J. Saravanan Kumar. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)18:58, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do notremove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did atJagatsinghpur district, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please useyour sandbox for that. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk13:59, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'mDhruv edits. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page2024 elections in India have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, pleasecite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message onmy talk page. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. Thank you.Dhruv edits (talk)05:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit toNaga People's Front did not have anedit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should beexplained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on thetalk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may bequite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
or in the visual editor:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to yourWikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by settingPreferences →Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.Thanks!Kautilya3 (talk)11:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election when you modified the page, you introducedunknown parameters. Just because you specify|some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The|some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is aShow preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact thehelp desk for assistance.Thank you.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)17:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mKautilya3. I noticed that you recentlyremoved content from2024 Indian general election in Manipur without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurateedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Kautilya3 (talk)15:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
References
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedParmila Tokas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAnil Sharma.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:56, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Kautilya3 (talk)11:47, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have noticed that youoften edit without using anedit summary. Please do your best toalways fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box inyour preferences. Thanks!THEZDRX(User) |(Contact)15:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Some of your recentgenre changes have conflicted with ourneutral point of view and/orverifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to providereliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seekconsensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.THEZDRX(User) |(Contact)15:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please useyour sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page. Thank you.THEZDRX(User) |(Contact)08:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did atNagaland, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article.Do not add unsourced content.Fylindfotberserk (talk)18:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unreferenced orpoorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did atSumit Hridayesh. Content of this nature could be regarded asdefamatory and is in violation ofWikipedia policy. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.Iiii I I I (talk)10:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mSarsenet. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using alarge language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usuallyunsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead readreliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have beenreverted. If you want to practice editing, please useyour sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Sarsenet•he/they•(talk)14:56, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBharatiya Janata Party – Jammu and Kashmir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNagrota Assembly constituency.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)20:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with ourpolicies on large-language model use especially in discussion-like settings likeWikipedia:Administrator_elections/December_2025/Candidates/Unknown_FG. I would heavily suggest rewording your statement in your own words and not relying on AI writing/copyediting tools (besides spell check).Sohom (talk)15:42, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, and thank you for your interest in becoming an administrator on the English Wikipedia! I appreciate your enthusiasm. However, like Sohom, I have a few concerns about your nomination statement. In addition to the clear use of AI, I wanted to point out a few things people will likely discuss that are not in your favour. In general, I do not think you have enough experience. Generally speaking, administrators have over 10,000 edits at the time of nomination. At present, you have fewer than 7,000 edits. This isn't an absolute deal breaker, but this is a common concern voters have. Beyond this, it does not appear that you have participated much in administrative-type duties. For example, you have not participated in any discussions atAfD, and you do not have any advanced permissions (beyond ECR). Additionally, you rarely use edit summaries (98% of edits), which is expected to be able to explain what changes you are making, and you've made very few edits to talk pages (8 total). Administrators are expected to be able to clearly communicate with other editors and de-escalate conflict. At present, you have no evidence of this. You can do a great many things on Wikipedia without being an administrative. If you're interested in becoming an administrator, I recommend building your experience, especially in background tasks, such as AfD, SPI, and/or AIV. At present, I feel this is far too soon.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)16:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Unknown FG! I have read your AE nomination, and I wish to express some concerns I have. As has been said above by @Significa liberdade and @Sohom Datta, using an LLM to write your nomination and answer questions, which are very short and lacking much substance, is really not a good idea. I obviously cannot predict how editors will vote, however I am concerned that when discussion starts and the questions start coming in, you may face quite a bit of backlash. Whilst you do have a fair amount of content creation, your lack of edit summary use (only 1.3% of the time), no participation atWP:AfD, only one request atWP:RfPP, and an edit count below what is usually considered the minimum (10,000 edits) are almost certainly going to be roadblocks. I would respectfully recommend withdrawing from AE at this time, and begin participating in admin-focused areas, such as under theWP:NPP umbrella (AfD,AfC). This is your decision of course, but unfortunately at present I believeWP:NOTNOW applies.11WB (talk)21:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
N Takes advice?