Welcome to Wikipedia. Therecent edit you made toEliseo Soriano has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use thesandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informativeedit summary. You may also wish to read theintroduction to editing. Thank you.OllieFuryContribs20:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your ownpersonal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.Themfromspace (talk)21:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia'sno original research policy by adding your personal analysis orsynthesis into articles, as you did toEliseo Soriano, you will beblocked from editing Wikipedia.DanielRigal (talk)00:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I'm not emphasizing my own opinions on this article, I am modifying it because this is UNTRUTHFULNESS! [[Wikipedia:|policy]](UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onEli Soriano. Note that thethree-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate thethree-revert rule. If you continue,you may beblocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains aconsensus among editors. If necessary, pursuedispute resolution. –Shannon Rose (talk)19:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]