It is 1:57 AM where this user lives.

Hello, Toast1454, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions, especially your edits toRain World. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction andGetting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try theTask Center.

Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!TheWikiToby (talk)19:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toast1454! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor atRain World that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such astypo corrections or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.TheWikiToby (talk)19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

rain world

coding and stuffhere. unless you use visual editor-chaotic-thing- (talk)22:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report atWP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commonspolicy for an example, theGerman wiki is another. Please don't report users atWP:UAA if they haven't edited onthis wiki.Cabayi (talk)11:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, my bad.Toast1454 (talk)12:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toast1454. After reviewing your request, I haveenabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installingTwinkle orUltraviolet. It just adds a[Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision -that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revertclear and unambiguous cases of vandalismonly.Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something,ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, seeWikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on mytalk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!Malinaccier (talk)16:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've beenwhacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE180.150.55.167 (talk)22:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC) why did you revert the change[reply]

Your two edits that I have reverted do not conform to Wikipedia's editing guidelines. You can find themhere. Please take some time to read and familiarize yourself with them.

Specifically, your edits are non-encyclopedic and do not fit the formal tone of Wikipedia.Toast1454_TC23:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits also appear to be personal opinions, which is against Wikipedia guidelines.Toast1454_TC23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rethis blind revert toTofu-dreg project, which added backunsourced material to the article, and the subsequent incorrect warning you left on my talk page.

It is one of Wikipedia's strongest policies that all additions of information must include a citation, especially when they accuse people of a crime. You should know this by now.

My edit removing the accusation had an edit summary that you ignored in your hurry to revert using automated tools. Misuse of automated tools in this way can lead to editors having them removed.

Please slow down and be more careful in future. And also revert you addition of unsourced accusations to the article. Thanks.81.2.123.64 (talk)16:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've beenwhacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Friendly fire! No hard feelings, from one vandalism fighter to another. — ClaudineChionh(she/her ·talk ·email ·global)12:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am very grateful that you changed the page and gave criticism so I’ll say again thanksMediolgy (talk)17:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning forthis isn't necessary, as a bot will reinsert the header.Cutlass^Ciera18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery *_{it has begun...}18:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, whole bunch of these and some edit-warring too:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Cylinder count parameter and positioning of cylinders.Andy Dingley (talk)18:42, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've beenwhacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Removing information I just added to a page. It is 100% factual even if not available to the public yet.NWood1 (talk)14:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need a reliable source to back upany claims that may be disputed, even to the slightest degree.

Also, you claimed to be an employee of Essendant. This means a there is a high chance of aconflict of interest, where you may add bias due to your connection to the article subject.

Here is more information about reliable sources.

Here is more information about the Wikipedia policy about bias.

Hope this helps.Toast1454_TC14:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Toast1454. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged forspeedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the newtutorial for patrollers,criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section coveringnon-criteria. Such pages are best tagged withproposed deletion orproposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriatedeletion discussion. Thanks!204.111.137.20 (talk)19:38, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not seeing the purpose behind the Melotone Records disambiguation page. Nothing links there except your talk page.Toast1454_TC19:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again you need to readWP:CSD, so please answer one simple question, isMelotone currently a DAB page as of 1900 UTC today when you placed the speedy tag? yes or no will do.204.111.137.20 (talk)19:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which Melotone page are you referring to here?Melotone Records (disambiguation) orMelotone?Toast1454_TC19:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The one I linked,Melotone, please answer with yes or no.204.111.137.20 (talk)19:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,Melotone has been a disambiguation page for years now. The CSD tag was placed on theredirect to the disambiguation.Toast1454_TC20:02, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're getting to that. So again yes or no will do here, as of 1900 UTC today when you placed the speedy tag didMelotone Records (disambiguation) targetMelotone?204.111.137.20 (talk)20:03, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the redirect to disambiguation has always targeted Melotone.

I have something to attend to, please hold the conversation.Toast1454_TC20:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by hold, I don't expect prompt replies nor do I infer anything from explained tardiness.

Returning to the topic, you have admitted knowledge that at the time of your speedy tagging the redirect it was placed on targeted a disambiguation page. So I would like to understand why given that knowledge you would placeTemplate:Db-g14 since the only redirects the criteria applies to are "Redirects that end in "(disambiguation)" but target neither disambiguation pages nor pages that perform disambiguation-like functions (such as set index articles or lists)".204.111.137.20 (talk)20:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I misread the G14 criteria, they are written in a confusing manner.Toast1454_TC21:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary G14 is entirely unambiguous, all bad speedy tags do is waste time; please refrain from tagging any pages for speedy until you have read and understood the criteria. Also judging by your message on my talk page you don't seem to understand the differrence between a speedy tag and an AFD notice, so you should spend some time familiarizing yourself with deletion policy more generally before continuing to make edits in the area, thank you.204.111.137.20 (talk)21:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were reminded above of the following when you were granted rollback privileges : "Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked."

This edit is clearly a content dispute against an anonymous editor, restoring information that is under contention. Irrespective of whetherthis is a well explained edit, it's clearly made with the intent of improving the encyclopedia.

If I see repeated abuse of the rollback privileges, I'm afraid they will have to be withdrawn.Ritchie333^(talk)(cont)08:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see why the content should be removed. What's wrong with it?Toast1454_TC11:27, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion on the content; suffice to say you should not use anti-vandalism tools on an edit simply because you disagree with it. I would advise you to forget about project maintenance entirely and focus solely on writing articles.Ritchie333^(talk)(cont)13:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source allows the contested table to be updated from 2021, should this be done instead of completely removing it?Toast1454_TC15:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Yum ToaSt
	I'll STAY forever, oh I'll STAY here! I'll STAY forever, I'm right here!StrayKidsStayForever (talk)19:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not vandalism, it's a content dispute.PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk)15:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war, according to the reverts you've made toWoodhey High School. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected tocollaborate with others, avoid editingdisruptively, andtry to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring isdisruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article'stalk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection.If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may beblocked from editing.PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk)15:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't broken the 3RR yet, and I think I'll open an RFC on the talk page. Seeing the page history, do you think the page should be protected?Toast1454_TC15:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you did, and personally I'd say use IP blocks instead of protection if the TAs continue edit warring. Established users like you and I should know better, but I can understand the mistake because I almost reverted and warned the one TA for blanking myself when I first stumbled across it in recent changes. It's easy for RC patrol to start to feel like whack-a-mole, but it's really more like those training exercises USA law enforcement have with shoot/don't shoot scenario targets, and reverting a good edit is like accidently shooting the little old lady or mom with kids cut out.PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk)19:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've beenwhacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: telling me your blood type, I did not know toast could have blood, let alone a blood type, I am now scared. I hope this did not hurt too much.Thapy-comechatツ05:28, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added from the book "Sindh and the Races that Inhabit The Valley of Indus" by Richard F Burton. The book is available for free online in pdf form. You can verify it from there.Tariq Barki (talk)18:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Usethis citation template and re-add the material. I can't access the book pdf right now.Toast1454_TC18:09, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add reference but was not able to. I clicked the cite button also and did all. Nothing worked. Apologies for my naivety.Tariq Barki (talk)18:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I really love mountains so I’m trying to edit the page “Pumori” and I dont understand how to add citations can anybody help me?KhunzWiki (talk)15:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too experienced with adding citations. You could try heading tothe teahouse, they can help you more than I can.Toast1454_TC15:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Toast1454, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, ScrabbleTiles (talk)09:40, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

ScrabbleTiles (talk)09:40, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw your message on my page about an edit of mine you reverted on the page forAngels & Airwaves. In your revert comment, you said that my edit was not explained, which if I'm being honest, I disagree with. A comment was left when the edit was made clearly stating that the removed content was biased speculation on the part of whoever added it. Nothing in the provided source discussing "possibly putting Angels & Airwaves on a hold," which is why this was removed. I don't know if you may have missed the comment left on my edit, so if you could explain a bit more, it would clarify the situation. Thank you.!SmadeB! (talk)19:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The content in question has sources that meet theRS criteria, so unless you can find additional sources that call it speculation, the content stays.Toast1454_TC19:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]