User talk:Tisquesusa
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | User page |  | | Library | | | Talk | |
| Talk page | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to my talk page The Fossilworks link inCremnoceramus is pointing to ammonites rather than Cremnoceramus. Not a personal criticism, but my opinion is that Fossilworksat best is non-definitive for distribution, but I know it is widely used on the wiki. Personally, I have found its use has perpetuated some amount of obsolete or inaccurate stratigraphic names. As is represents only a small subset of collections, it is far from authoritative as a source for distribution and its citation as such is in my opinion misleading. You added many categories, but there are many more; clearly the gallery isprima facie that Kansas is within the range of Cremnoceramus. (OR, but I have pieces of C. deformis at home from South Dakota.) Why exclude Ecuador, Venezuela, and Columbia just because the Fossilworks methodology overlooked them with respect to Cremnoceramus? Note, I state this only from WP illustration of the distribution of the Cremnoceramus environment; the recent works of the likes of Walaszszyk, et. al., would be a good place to start if one would really want to write an accurate statement of distribution.IveGoneAway (talk)15:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSchlern Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIllyrian. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGrand-Auverné Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageOnnia. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Hi! You recently createdCalpionellites and expandedCalpionella, in both cases adding a link toRożnów, Poland. Unfortunately, Rożnów is a disambiguation page, as there are three places with this name. Do you know which Rożnów is intended, or could you find out?Lennart97 (talk)13:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] I found a source that connects Calpionellites withLake Rożnów, so I've directed the links there. Feel free to correct.Lennart97 (talk)20:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSundvollen Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKiaeria. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Your edit summary, An automated process has detected that when you recently editedExter Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAsterolepis. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]  You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing for engaging inpersonal attacks that are beyond the pale. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
A tag has been placed onUser:Tisquesusa/Más Muisca, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of thecriteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Nsk92 (talk)10:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.Sturmvogel 66 (talk) andCwmhiraeth (talk).MediaWiki message delivery (talk)20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply] The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures. Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges:Sturmvogel 66 (talk) andCwmhiraethMediaWiki message delivery (talk)10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
is closed. --Deepfriedokra(talk)02:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]  The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Cruz Formation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. A tag has been placed onCategory:1537 disestablishments in the Muisca Confederation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:1537 disestablishments in South America indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:1538 disestablishments in the Muisca Confederation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:1538 disestablishments in South America indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:1539 disestablishments in the Muisca Confederation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:1539 disestablishments in South America indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] A tag has been placed onCategory:Prehistory of Nicaragua indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.LizRead!Talk!23:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]  Hello Tisquesusa. Followinga request for comment in May 2025, the community has decided to implement an activity requirement for theautopatrolled permission. Because your account has not edited in the last three years, the autopatrolled permission has been removed from your account. This action is purely procedural and does not affect your ability to create articles; if you return to actively creating articles, you may request that the permission be restored throughthe normal process. When returning, please consider taking some time to re-familiarize yourself with common practices and how they may have changed over the past few years if you wish to request the permission back. Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and we hope to see you again soon.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Cretaceous stratigraphy of the central Colombian Eastern Ranges[edit]
|
.svg)
