User talk:TimVickers
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. TimVickers has not edited Wikipediasince 13 December 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| ||||
|
|
| Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback |
|---|
|
If your review is not in thelist of unanswered reviews, you canadd it. |
Thank you for the invitation. I will try to follow the Enzyme Kinetics article and make contributions when I can.User:Todd40324 (talk) 9:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I have provided some additional sources which the general reader can also understand. For us scientists, youtube may seem an unreliable source, but that is only the case if the source itself is unreliable, which is why I have collected videos from somewhat reputable sources such as the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and others. This is so the general public can also partake and understand some of the main concepts of human evolution whereas if I only used peer reviewed scientific journals, the only people reading them would be the small minority of scientists on planet Earth. But as source of reference I will nonetheless continue to include peer reviewed scientific sources so that the scientific community will began to understand that human evolution is not the way they want it to be, but far more complicated series of migrations, evolution due to the selective pressure of their respective geographical location and possible interbreedings resulting in the modern day Homo Sapiens who happen to be part Homo Neanderthalensis and theChinese anatomically modernHomo Erectus who may either be part Homo Neanderthalensis due to possible interbreeding or it is possible theHomo Erectus inChina did not significantly interbreed with theHomo Neanderthalensis and that the anatomically modern Chinese Homo Erectus alive today simply retain what seems to be "neanderthal" genes because the Neanderthals were direct descendants ofHomo Heidelbergensis which happens to be either a separate species or subspecies ofHomo Erectus, and as such they both carry similar genes and passed them into their progeny in both respective evolutionary branches. Thank you! Please watch :
1.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpQiBPdFtog&NR=1
2.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9zVEQCIiRs&feature=related
| ||||
Content
| |||
Hello Tim,
I created article about artist Dimitry Gerrman, but when I tried to add it to wikipedia I got message that you removed on 09/29/2009 another article with the same name, because copyright problems. My article is the new one. Could you please help me to add this article or please explain what could I do at this case.
Thank you.User:Markus50 (talk) 10:42, 02/14/2012 (UTC)
I have nominatedEnzyme kinetics for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Z1720 (talk)15:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectLutz-Jeanselme syndrome has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 19 § Lutz-Jeanselme syndrome until a consensus is reached. —Myceteae🍄🟫(talk)23:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
