Archives

User talk:TiconderogaCCB/Archive 1.

HelloTicondergoaCCB, a page very similar to one you created (University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs) has been tagged fordeletion. The page tagged for deletion is theUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article may determine the eventual fate of the the page you created. If you are willing, please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you!cp101p (talk)08:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Wc&s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)15:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload ofFile:Campustour.jpeg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructionshere. Thanks!Message delivered byTheo's Little Bot (opt-out)14:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection toSt. John's University?ElKevbo (talk)17:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am a 2006 undergraduate alumnus, but have no connection to the university outside of that. Why do you ask?TiconderogaCCB (talk)18:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure that you're familiar with our policies and practices related toconflicts of interest.ElKevbo (talk)13:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dully noted. I do not think that being an alumnus automatically qualifies as a COI, however, editors should be aware of any influence their protentional bias, realized or otherwise, has on their changes. My primary and most important objective was to clean up the structure of the article as a whole and improve upon the language, outdated numbers, etc. I will go back and compare the last version before my edits to the current version for potential adjustments that could have been bias driven and make changes to ensure all contributions have remained in the article. ---- Are you concerned or advocating that the page be reverted back to the prior status? I would hate to see all the content in the prior format and my contributions altered.TiconderogaCCB (talk)14:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not examined your edits in enough detail to have any specific concerns. You do have a conflict of interest even if it's not one that many editors would consider to be an especially strong one. At a minimum you should be cautious in working on this article. Some editors might even insist that you should limit your contributions to making suggestions and requests in Talk but I think that would be a small minority of editors so I wouldn't do that. But you should be clear about your relationship with the institution; a note on your User page is the typical approach.ElKevbo (talk)15:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the advice, and will make that note in my User page. Hopefully if anyone has concerns they will compare the prior version to the present and note that almost all content is contained in one section of the article or another. I went and added back two small pieces of content I had deleted that could be interpreted as a bias omission. Overall, I believe my contributions going forward will be minor if any at all. The main idea was to get the article formatted in a way that allowed more constructive edits going forward with clear organization, and I believe that has been accomplished for the most part.TiconderogaCCB (talk) 16:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Also, side note, I made only a couple of small original contributions in all the edits (Diversity was the main one). It was almost 100% of the original article just reorganized or updated with grammar and format changes.TiconderogaCCB (talk)16:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]