HiThe Huhsz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest atthe Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors likeCullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered byHostBot on behalf of theTeahouse hosts 16:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, The Huhsz, andWelcome to Wikipedia!   

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGukurahundi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNdebele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)07:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from theGuild of Copy Editors, aWikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia articles throughcopy editing. You are receiving this invitation because someone has noticed the quality of your edits and your commitment to improving the content of Wikipedia. Please see ourproject page for more information andreasons to join. You may wish to join us during ourbacklog elimination drives, help fulfill editorrequests, or simply become a part of our supportive community. We hope to help you so that you can help make Wikipedia a better place! ~~~~

Thank you, that's very kind of you. --The Huhsz (talk)18:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, I don't think I want to be involved with a group which endorses the current poor state of our article onIndia. A "copy-editor" who misses basic grammatical and spelling errors probably isn't really worth having, and unfortunately your "guild" in this instance is being used to justify impeding improvement. Good luck with your endeavours in any case. --The Huhsz (talk)06:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with any attempt to overhaul the Zeppelin articles; there is virtually nothing of any worth published in English. I had a go at expanding some of them but run up against this lack of reliable sources.TheLongTone (talk)14:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I actually found a few decent sources when I wsa researching theGraf Zeppelin article. And of course, almost any source is better than no source. A lot of these articles read like they were written by hobbyists, based on their personal knowledge, which is sometimes inaccurate or wrong. --The Huhsz (talk)16:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. I'll have a look again; I had a bit of a go a while back but obviously have not doen well enough.TheLongTone (talk)15:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is no deadline. --The Huhsz (talk)20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Botting, Douglas (1980).The giant airships. Alexandria, Virginia, US: Time-Life Books.ISBN 0-8094-3271-4.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Brookes, Andrew (1992).Disaster in the Air. Shepperton, UK: Ian Allan.ISBN 978-0-7110-2037-5.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Dick, Harold G; Robinson, Douglas H (1985).The golden age of the great passenger airships: Graf Zeppelin & Hindenburg. Washington DC, US: Smithsonian Institution Press.ISBN 978-1-56098-219-7.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Duggan, J; Meyer, H Cord (2001).Airships in International Affairs 1890–1940. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN 978-1-349-41234-1.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Hancock, Peter (2017).Transports of Delight: How Technology Materializes Human Imagination. New York City, US: Springer.ISBN 978-3-319-55247-7.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Lehmann, Ernst (1937).Zeppelin: The Story of Lighter-than-air Craft. London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co.ISBN 978-1-78155-012-0.OL 25072641M.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help);Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Meyer, Henry Cord (1991).Airshipmen, businessmen, and politics, 1890–1940. Washington DC, US: Smithsonian Institution Press.ISBN 978-1-56098-031-5.OL 1864423M.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Robinson, Douglas H (1975).Giants in the sky: a history of the rigid airship. Seattle, Washington, US: University of Washington Press.ISBN 978-0-295-95249-9.OL 5291361M.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Swinfield, John (2013).Airship: Design, Development and Disaster. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84486-209-2.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• de Syon, Gillaume (2005).Zeppelin!: Germany and the airship, 1900–1939. Baltimore, Maryland, US: Johns Hopkins University Press.ISBN 978-0-8018-6734-7.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Vaeth, J Gordon (1958).Graf Zeppelin: The Adventures Of An Aerial Globetrotter. New York City, US: Harper & Brothers.OL 4113768W.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)
• Ventry, Lord; Kolesnik, Eugene M (1982).Airship saga: the history of airships seen through the eyes of the men who designed, built, and flew them. Poole, UK: Blandford Press.ISBN 978-0-7137-1001-4.{{cite book}}:Invalid|ref=harv (help)

Here are some of the sources I found and used for theGraf Zeppelin article. Most are accessible online, to a greater or lesser extent. --The Huhsz (talk)23:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...I see that you havn't listed either the Peter Brooke Putnam book on Zeppelins (which I want but am reluctant to pay 50 gbp for) or Eckener's autobiog, which I would say is essential reading. I've read most of the others; imo the recent ones are merely rehashing the material to be found in ealier sources.TheLongTone (talk)12:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions. I'll try to get a hold of them. I don't think my budget can extend to £50 either. --The Huhsz (talk)07:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eckener's autiobiog is called My Zeppelins; I've just done a search on abebooks and even a used softback reprint is over thirty bucks; copies of the hardback original are even more expensive. Sigh. I am fortunate in having an excellent library with an extensive aerospace collection, due to the local connections with the industry.— Precedingunsigned comment added byTheLongTone (talk •contribs)

Yes, this might be my chance to rediscover my local library. --The Huhsz (talk)18:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody who read this thread kindly uploaded the Peter Brook book... here is a link[1]

Wow, thank you! --The Huhsz (talk)12:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 January 2020,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleAlasdair Gray, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Martinevans123 (talk)00:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martinevans123 (talk)00:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am honoured. And happy new year. --The Huhsz (talk)00:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAlasdair Gray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEdwin Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that's fixed. --The Huhsz (talk)10:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Sunday Herald front cover 4 May 2014 by Alasdair Gray.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, FastilyBot. I've contested the proposed deletion, and refined my rationale as per your request. --The Huhsz (talk)01:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Something the article might gain from could be a bit more discussion about the distinctive characteristics of Gray's visual work, including the characteristics of his published graphic design. This might tip the case for keeping the image, which IMO is rather a good representative of the style of his work in this area.Jheald (talk)19:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will see what I can do. I have already added a few good web sources and a book. Maybe there's more.The Huhsz (talk)20:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Wiki Greetings, ca give me a reason forthis I just noticed. Thank you.→Enock4seth^(talk)09:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK Links to countries are not generally useful. --The Huhsz (talk)18:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was reading over theAlasdair Gray article and the work ye've done on it has been brilliant. I was thinking it may be worthwhile putting it up for a GAN, and given yer work I thought it best to consult before I did so in case ye wished to do so yerselfCiphriusKane (talk)13:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation