User talk:The Blue Rider
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | |
| Archives:1234 |
Yourgood article nomination of the articleJosé Vicente Barbosa du Bocage is
under review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGiantflightlessbirds --Giantflightlessbirds (talk)01:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I see your doing some significant work on the BPD page, which is great to see, it definitely needs some work. I thought I would just reach out directly here instead of the articles talk page because the talk page does tend to get quite cluttered. I just wanted to give some feedback on your recent edits as I'm assuming that based on the rework you did, you're looking to improve the page more in the future.
There is some overly technical wording in some of your recent additions, the audience for such a well known mental ilness is going to be mostly laypeople so I think phrases such asemotional granularity, negative affect, non-acceptance of emotional responses, emotional clarity, and adaptive coping strategies
may be overly technical. Even as someone who has studied this topic area extensively I still feel like this wording requires me to brush up on my terminology. Some of these terms may benefit from being glossed. I don't know how much you've edited in Med and psych areas but the best practice for this is to expain the term in simple words then put the technical term in brackets (seeWP:MTAU). for example:
the tendency to experience negative emotions (negative affectivity)
and so forth.
The other thing I noticed is that you're using a lot of older sources. This isn't as big of a deal as the text you replaced also used older sources but especially with med/psych it's helpful to aim to use the most recent reliable sources so that they don't have to be updated/replaced as often. If you don't have access to newer sources I'd be more than happy to download some pretty comprehensive recent ones and send you pdfs through email as I know getting access to recent sources can be tricky.
I hope this didn't come off as overly critical, I'm honestly just happy to see someone devoting some time to this particular article since it does need some love.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:54, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello The Blue Rider:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding amonth-longGood Article Editathon event in October 2025!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the themeWhat Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk),Spookyaki (talk) &Alanna the Brave (talk)
You are receiving this message as a member of theWikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notificationshere.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleDaniela Melchior isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)22:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleThe Blue Rider (Kandinsky) isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChiswick Chap --Chiswick Chap (talk)20:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleDaniela Melchior has been placed
on hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)21:25, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleTamara Bunke isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofEasternsahara --Easternsahara (talk)22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleThe Blue Rider (Kandinsky) has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChiswick Chap --Chiswick Chap (talk)16:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleDaniela Melchior has
passed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)22:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HiThe Blue Rider and thanks for your GA review of the articlePolitical philosophy a while back. I've nominated the article for FA status but the nomination hasn't attracted much attention so far. I was wondering whether you might be interested in providing some feedback atWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Political philosophy/archive1. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time.Phlsph7 (talk)16:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleThe Blue Rider (Kandinsky) haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChiswick Chap --Chiswick Chap (talk)16:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | Women in Green Editathon October '25 | |
| This barnstar is given in recognition of your contributions toWomen in Green's October 2025"What Women Do" Good Article Editathon! Together, we nominated 27 Good Articles and conducted 19 GA reviews. We exceeded our goal, addressing 34 different occupations. Thank you for improving the quality of Wikipedia's coverage of women!~ L 🌸 (talk)23:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HiThe Blue Rider and thanks for your GA review of the articleDaniela Lalita. Your comments were very helpful in improving it. Since then, I have thoroughly checked all statements in the text against the sources, added new sources, and removed older, less reliable ones. I have implemented all the specific suggestions for improvement. The proofreading by WP:GUILD is now complete, and the resulting shortening should make the article more readable. You suggested to ping you to have a second look. Thank you if you have the time.◉wwwWiki◉04:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
