Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did toLeccinum aurantiacum. Your edits could be interpreted asvandalism and have beenreverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, pleasecite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article'stalk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, useyour sandbox. Thank you.Eric^talk00:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that I added any incorrect information. The only information I added was true, and I also cited a source.TheNatureKid (talk)01:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you cited for your assertions does not support them. It does state that this fungus was implicated as a contributing factor to a death, but does not state that it caused the death. The source does not mention other poisonings due to this fungus.Eric^talk01:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't even revert the edit, since it still says "It is considered a choice edible, but must be cooked thoroughly, as there have been a number of poisonings and at least one death caused by consuming it.".TheNatureKid (talk)01:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is namyco.org (the source I cited) an unreliable source?TheNatureKid (talk)01:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for doing that. It was not my intention. I wasn't trying to mislead anyone.TheNatureKid (talk)01:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the pageMushroom hunting, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is torespect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), useBritish English. For something related to the United States in the same way, useAmerican English. For something related to anotherEnglish-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that thefirst author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in theManual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me onmy talk page or visit thehelp desk. Thank you.FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk)18:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for doing that. Should I revert my edit?TheNatureKid (talk)18:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've been adding common names to mushroom species articles, citingMushrooms Demystified as a source. However, what you are actually citing is not that book, but rather abook review of that book, published in the journalMycologia. Could you please return to these articles and replace your added source with the correct one? Here is a named citation you could use to replace the ones you've added (of course, you should add the correct page# for each instance):

<ref name="Arora 1986">{{cite book |author=Arora D. |title=Mushrooms Demystified: A Comprehensive Guide to the Fleshy Fungi |publisher=Ten Speed Press |location=Berkeley, California |year=1986 |isbn=978-0-89815-169-5 |page= |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/mushroomsdemysti00aror_0 }}</ref>

Have a good day,Esculenta (talk)17:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, I will be sure to not keep making that mistake. However, there are so many pages that I've edited that I don'tremember all of them.TheNatureKid (talk)17:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can click on the "Contributions" link on the upper right to get a listing of all your edits. 17:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Esculenta (talk)17:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like this one fromGomphidius subroseus:

{{Cite book|last=Arora|first=David|title=Mushrooms demystified: a comprehensive guide to the fleshy fungi|date=1986|publisher=Ten Speed Press|isbn=978-0-89815-169-5|edition=Second edition|location=Berkeley}}

Arora, David (1986).Mushrooms demystified: a comprehensive guide to the fleshy fungi (Second edition ed.). Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.ISBN 978-0-89815-169-5.{{cite book}}:|edition= has extra text (help)

—Trappist the monk (talk)21:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I avoid it?TheNatureKid (talk)21:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't include the word 'edition' in|edition=.

You are using that abomination that is the visual editor so I presume that you are giving it an ISBN and asking it to fill in the other bibliographic detail. I don't use VE so I can't tell you how to fix malformed VE-created citations except to switch to the text editor and manually remove the offending text. You might ask about editing a template with VE atWikipedia:Help desk.

Alternately, you can switch to the text editor, locate where you want the citation to go, and then use theWP:RefToolbar Cite > Templates > Cite book menu to create a citation from an ISBN. RefToolbar doesn't include the extraneous 'edition' in the citation that it creates:

{{cite book|last1=Arora|first1=David|title=Mushrooms demystified: a comprehensive guide to the fleshy fungi|date=1986|publisher=Ten Speed Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=978-0-89815-169-5|edition=Second}}

Arora, David (1986).Mushrooms demystified: a comprehensive guide to the fleshy fungi (Second ed.). Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.ISBN 978-0-89815-169-5.

Please do at least one of these so that other editors aren't forced to cleanup after you.

—Trappist the monk (talk)23:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you used the name "Türkiye" as the name of the country generally known in English as "Turkey" in your recent edit.

Q: Why don't you use the nameTürkiye, the correct name for this country?

A: Because the English-language Wikipedia has aWP:COMMONNAME policy. We use names for countries and places that are the names commonly used for themin English, regardless of what official organizations use. Technically, this kind of name is known as anexonym. For example, we use the nameGermany, instead of the nativeendonymDeutschland, and we use the nameJapan instead of the native name日本.

Q: But the Turkish government, U.S. State Department, and United Nations all use "Türkiye", so it must be correct.

A: Indeed they do. ButWP:COMMONNAME is not authority-based, but usage-based.

Notice that this does not apply when we are quoting a literal namein Turkish; for example, the newspaper is calledTürkiye, notTurkey. To do that would behypercorrection, and we don't do that. Nor do we mangle the name into English in direct quotations, including titles of documents, nor in URLs. But it does apply for all usesin Wikipedia's own voice in the English language, including article titles (so the capital isAnkara, Turkey, not "Ankara, Türkiye")

If or when that general English-language usage changes (as has happened in the past with place names such asMumbai andBeijing), the sameWP:COMMONNAME policy implies that the English-language Wikipedia will necessarily also follow suit. So far, that hasn't happened.

This has been discussed many times, with the same result every time because of the common name policy. If you'd like to discuss this further, please take it up atTalk:Turkey. However, for the reasons given above, there is currently a moratorium on further requests for name changes to theTurkey article until 1 December 2023. —The Anome (talk)13:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the points are not point per byte :) You added 54.034 points in total. It is 1 point for 1000 bytes of text.Arthistorian1977 (talk)16:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the awesome new fungus articleChroogomphus tomentosus! Hope this cupcake is more appetizing than the fungus would be.Shocksingularity (talk)04:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!TheNatureKid (talk)04:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]