Hello, TansoShoshen26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Varman Dynasty (Cambodia), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)20:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Varman Dynasty (Cambodia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go toDraft:Varman Dynasty (Cambodia), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk)20:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,TansoShoshen26!Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!KylieTastic (talk)20:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In your editshere andhere, you put information which are not in the sources. Please take care to only state either what is in the source, can be easily checked, or is widely known.Veverve (talk)05:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Varman Dynasty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!21:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Raikan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}10:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:King Liang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)20:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Raikan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)11:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Raikan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!CptViraj (talk)11:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. Your question has been answered at theTeahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions arearchived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added byMolecularPilot02:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC). (You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

HelloTansoShoshen! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Are these vandals the same person?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not addoriginal research ornovel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did toList of heads of former ruling families. Please cite areliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.DrKay (talk)17:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Plainrock124, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Plainrock124 and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofDraft:Plainrock124 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ASUKITE17:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HelloTansoShoshen! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Draft article keeps being submitted for creation despite not being complete, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)04:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HelloTansoShoshen! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Are PRODs able to be denied with seemingly no rationale?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is convention for articles of eclipses to show an actual image in the infobox once the eclipse has passed. Partial revert.108.160.120.147 (talk)08:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but we should remove the image from the gallery then. No reason to have the same photo twice.TansoShoshen (talk)08:22, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My friend I am the author ofAlireza kiarashi article. It’s better to help improve it instead of voting to delete it. Thanks.Shayanbehrad10 (talk)22:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit updating Nae Nae!

sheridanford (talk)18:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectKhmer Knong has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 24 § Khmer Knong until a consensus is reached.Suonii180 (talk)10:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TansoShoshen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:PJRith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)12:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SignedInteger was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions atWikipedia:Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not too sure what else to say since this just redirects to a completely different page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Ongezellig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{S.G. (They/Them)(Talk)(Edits)}11:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drew Stanley was:

Issues from before - still not fixed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit itafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Plainrock124 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drew Stanley (talk)20:01, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw that you started an ANI discussion aboutThomson Walt regarding pages they created for hoaxing and original research. I came across several articles written by the editor and have had the same thoughts. TheSyamapura article for instance, I have looked up 'Syamapura' on Google and have not seen any sites that discuss such a kingdom aside from the Wikipedia article. Searching 'Syamapura' also leads to a link to a Facebook group post that used the Wikipedia article as a source surmising that Khmer people did not create Angkor Wat. Link for reference -Facebook post,Archived. I do not participate in frivelous discourse on Facebook however the post provides good insight into how these Wikipedia articles are used to spread misinformation; to which the Wikipedia articles feel like an attempt to retcon Thai history.

In this page that they createdZhān Bó, reference 7 seems highly suspicious. It is used again inKeoi Lau Mì as reference 2 and is cited several times. The reference in questionE-Shann leads to a site listing the magazine for sale.

Link to ANI discussion:[1]

I do not know how or what avenues to go about in order to address these articles but I wanted to let you know that your concerns are valid.MosheeYoshee (talk)02:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC