User talk:Taivo
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Taivo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs15:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed onUser talk:Deepkang. I do not think thatUser talk:Deepkang fits any of thespeedy deletion criteria becauseWP:UP allows "limited autobiographical content" and I do not see an infobox as exceeding that. Also, we do not normally delete the main user talk page of an editor. I request that you consider not re-taggingUser talk:Deepkang for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page.DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs16:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please note that speedy deletion G5 only applies to articles created by a sockpuppet of a blocked editor created after the sockmaster has been blocked as perWP:CSD, regardsAtlantic306 (talk)17:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BC/AD has been re-established. HammerFilmFan— Precedingunsigned comment added by50.111.1.232 (talk)17:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I pinged you by mistake, thinking you were the other Taivo. I suspect HammerFilmFan above made the same mistake. I hope that you don't mind the link I added to your user page. The other Taivo was very active here, and a lot of us have gotten confused. —kwami (talk)20:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Taivo,
You recently tagged a User page for CSD G13 deletion that wasn't eligible for this criteria. Please reviewWikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 and the entireCriteria for Speedy Deletion page before tagging any more pages for deletion. Please use the appropriate criteria when you tag pages for speedy deletion.
If you have questions, please bring them tothe Teahouse. Thank you.LizRead!Talk!23:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Random post from a person currently in discussion with the "not to be confused with" editor, the TaivoLinuguist.
Thank you for not abandonning Wikipedia.81.89.66.133 (talk)12:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedIndrek Allmann, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesAidu andRandvere. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Taivo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia'smandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category ofconflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies onneutral point of view and whatWikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin toblack-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on thetalk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through thearticles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you arerequired by theWikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page atUser:Taivo. The template{{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:{{paid|user=Taivo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case,do not edit further until you answer this message.LizRead!Talk!02:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I thought I'd host a meetup during Wikimania this month. What do you think? SeeWikipedia:Meetup/Utah/August_2022.KarenJoyce (talk)02:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you tagging troll socks, years after they've been blocked? This is pretty disruptive and there's a reason CUs and clerks don't tag every sock.PRAXIDICAE🌈19:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
. --Blablubbs (talk)20:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]I will report you for harassment, and for forcing a vote. Good fortune to you, looks bleak to me. For, forcing a vote against a 1-1, and for intimidation. You think this is okay?12.Radlrb (talk)18:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}