Archives —
SM:2010· 2011:Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4· 2012:Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4· 2013:Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4· 2014:Q1,Q2,Q3, Q4·2015+
SQ:2015 to 2019· 2020:Q1, Q2,Q3, Q4·2021 to 2022

Architecture of the Song dynasty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)13:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you changed your name! Greetings from Colombia.→ Call meRazrNation06:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, I did. I'm also not around here that much any more, as other hobbies (mainly TTRPGs) take up most of my time. Good to see you're doing alright!The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)21:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miller Center has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)17:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven years ago,you were found precious. That's what you are, always. (sorry, missed it last year due to the name change) --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:XCOM Enemy Unknown, illustration of the strategy UI.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)19:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleGallery of distinctive unit insignias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of distinctive unit insignias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk)16:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo on completing whatever setWeberbauerella raimondiana was a part of.jengod (talk)19:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksJengod. I'm an admin over on Commons and someone nominated an image from an open access journal for deletion, not realizing it was correctly freely licensed, and that's how I discovered that there's a trove of freely licensed plant photos available. I've been uploading images from other articles in that journal whenever I have time.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Niiiice. Finding a good source opens up so many possibilities sometimes. Anyway thanks again and congrats.jengod (talk)20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Squirrel Conspiracy,Yesterday, you blocked my Wikimedia Commons account without any specifics or rationale. Perhaps there's a reason there, but all that's written is "Spamming".

As a linguistics researcher, involved in language development for over 85 different micro-languages, I take that quite personally. Can you go into some detail regarding what was consider spam?Andrew J Olson (talk)18:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your edits, it appeared to me that you were attempting to funnel traffic to websites you own, such as theyneedthebible.blogspot.com, through the inappropriate use of external links, and you were using your Commons uploads as part of that attempt. If you disagree with this assessment, you can request an unblock on your Commons user talk page.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)00:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I am new to wikipedia and I am interested in improving an article,Bali Aga. However, it is being continually harassed by sockpuppets of the user YilevBot, and you recently rolled back the article to remove their additions of copyvio images. Their (checkuser confirmed) sockpuppets recently readded images that are most likely copyvio, but I don't have any defininitive proof of them being copyvio and would like to know if I need proof to revert the edits, as well as what would constitute reasonable proof if necessary.

Also in general, many of the sockpuppet's low quality and misinformed contributions get through on that page. I think they harm the article greatly, but I do not want to contribute to an edit war reverting them. What do you think is reasonable for me to do as a new user to deal with this issue?

Thank you very much for your service to Wikipedia. After looking through your user contributions, I find it very reassuring that people like you are here to help maintain Wikipedia, and keep it in line with its purpose.似た牌愛魔 (talk)15:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI that you can change what templates like{{user and pronouns}} show by changing the "Gender used in messages" option inSpecial:Preferences. CheersCharlotte (Queen of Hearts •talk)21:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I went looking and missed it.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)23:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections |Instructions for candidates

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2024 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• October 15–21:SecurePoll setup phase
• October 22–24: Discussion phase
• October 25–31: SecurePoll voting phase
• November 1–?: Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the SecurePoll setup phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend the SecurePoll setup phase from October 15–21 getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 22–24. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as arequest for adminship (RfA). Please make sure you are around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use theSecurePoll software to vote, which uses asecret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your tally during the election. Thesuffrage requirements are different from those at RfA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on themain election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must have received at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are nobureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on theelection talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

You're receiving this message because you are a candidate in the October 2024 administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~Lindsay^Hello07:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the best with your candidacy for adminship._Regards,Aafi ^(talk)13:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)19:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i add the "Ruben Sim" profile picture, which is ai and it was flagged as a copyvio. so i want to ask how do ai images work as in copyright. i am a new user and i don't want to make the same mistake againc

cheers1timeuse75 (talk)19:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you tell me why you rejected the Superman emblems I posted, and took them out on the Superman logo page, please? I thought I was just trying to help you, that’s all.NoahBWill2002 (talk)16:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticednypu have removed all ai images I have added.Is ai images not allowed in Wikipedia?You have mentioned ' Remove terrible AI image'.

How did you concluded it is 'terrible'?

Why did you removed the images?CaptiveWarrior (talk)08:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptiveWarrior: AI aren't banned, but are almost always inaccurate, and at the very least are low quality. For example, in this case the weapon in the AI image looks nothing like the image in the photo.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)21:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, Remjeud here

I am writing to ask you to unblock my account on the basis of lack of evidence for accusing me of copyright violation.The following are truly mine and has not violated copyright of any kind.File:1733116395551 Bust of St Berchmans Sb college.jpgFile:1732727748180 Kavukattu hall.jpgFile:1732727748226 Back of sb.jpgFile:1732727748250sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727748273 sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727892257 sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727892163 sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727892225sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727892293 sb college top view.jpgFile:1732727892196sb college top view.jpgFile:Kavukatt hall of sb college Shakespearean theatre.jpgFile:1730811124384 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124015 left wing sb college.jpgFile:1730811123949 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124105 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124078 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124050 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124185 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124156sb college.jpgFile:1730811124131 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124351 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124245 inside 2.jpgFile:1730811124212 sb college.jpgFile:1730811124271sb college.jpgFile:1730811124321sb college.jpgFile:1730811124474sb college.jpgFile:1730811124295sb college.jpgFile:1730811124542sb college.jpgFile:1730811124497 SB College.jpgFile:1730811124519sb college.jpgFile:1730376488274 sbhs.jpgFile:Front view of St. Berchmans College.jpgFile:St. Berchmans College tower 2.jpgFile:St. Berchmans College tower.jpgFile:Front view of St. Berchmans College 2.jpgFile:1730375182393 College Tower.jpgFile:1730371967694 Newmans hostel prem nazir.jpgFile:1730372042967 Old Sb College.jpgFile:Old photo of St. Berchmans College, 1971.jpgFile:New photo of St. Berchmans College.jpgHowever i do accept the matter that i once have uploade image of mar george koovakad without providing the necessary licence. But later i tried to rectify the mistake by uploading my own image of mar george koovakad which i took during his Episcopal ordination. It was Pbritti who accused me of copyright violation where my image was used by multiple sites for their gain. I may support evidences as you require.Please unblock my account for the misunderstanding you have been given. I haven't violated any kind of copyright.ThanksRemjeud (talk)11:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remjeud: You need to request your unblock on Commons. You still have the ability to edit your own user talk page on that project to do so. And yes, considering that so many of the images you uploaded were found elsewhere online, you will need to usecommons:COM:VRT to demonstrate you actually own the copyright to them.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)23:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there is no list--at least not on our Wiki: that was the only account. Thanks,Drmies (talk)14:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)17:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedList of major Super Smash Bros. Ultimate tournaments for featured list removal. Pleasejoin the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Witsako (talk)23:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear The Squirrel,

I hope you’re doing well. I recently noticed that you added a “potentially paid editing” template to the articleRanda Kassis and Fabien Baussart and mentioned my account name in connection with it. I would like to understand the reasoning behind this.

I joined Wikipedia nine years ago and started contributing to the French version, focusing initially on football players. Later, I became interested in politics and have contributed sporadically and randomly since then.

I did not create either of these pages. Upon reviewing their histories, I found that theRanda Kassis page was created by Tradedia, a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit on Wikipedia, while theFabien Baussart page was created by a user named Hazar Sam.

I want to assure you that my contributions are made in good faith and are focused on adding value to the Wikipedia community. If there has been any misunderstanding about my intentions, I am happy to provide further clarification.

Thanks for taking the time to look into this. I genuinely value your feedback and hope we can sort this out together. Feel free to let me know your thoughts or suggestions.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

Ecrivain WagnerEcrivain Wagner (talk)08:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly note that i have an extra known account called "User:Tortino66", the both accounts may share the same IP address "not a sockmaster", the other account is based more for editing in English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, and I have notified that on my English and Arabic Wikipedia User Pages.

Also it was created after taking advice from more than an administrator in Arabic Wikipedia.

I am sorry for misunderstanding, and please I need a solution for that.

Regards.

RoyalKnight66 (talk)09:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been mentioned in a discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard regarding the recent deletions of articles about the Astana platform. The discussion also addresses allegations made by **The Squirrel Conspiracy** concerning undisclosed paid editing (UPE) and account connections.

You can review and participate in the discussion here: [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents].

Thank you.Ecrivain Wagner (talk)05:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kindly check and join the discussion.

Thank you.

RoyalKnight66 (talk)13:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the user meant to point you toWikipedia:Administrative_action_review#An_Administrator_have_accused_me_of_receiving_money. --Yamla (talk)13:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to look atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Davi Santiago de Souza to determine whetherJéssica F. Souza needs any attention on Commons, and whether to trouble the Stewards for Global Locks. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦14:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll handle it.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)19:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sea of Japan naming dispute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Under what license did the user publish the file on Commons? — Ирука¹³08:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Iruka13::{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}, but the problem is that it was aderivative work of the glass sculpture itself.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)08:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MkLeo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔)02:02, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSamsora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕BP!🍕 (🔔)05:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMarss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕BP!🍕 (🔔)06:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDabuz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabuz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕BP!🍕 (🔔)13:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleZackray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zackray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍕BP!🍕 (🔔)14:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you add thesenew socks to the global block list on meta? I'm non-autopatrolled there. Thank you.0x0a (talk)10:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBravelets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bravelets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WormEater13 (talk •contribs)00:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:North America articles by importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!23:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Squirrel Conspiracy. Followinga request for comment in May 2025, the community has decided to implement an activity requirement for theautopatrolled permission. Because your account has not edited in the last three years, the autopatrolled permission has been removed from your account. This action is purely procedural and does not affect your ability to create articles; if you return to actively creating articles, you may request that the permission be restored throughthe normal process. When returning, please consider taking some time to re-familiarize yourself with common practices and how they may have changed over the past few years if you wish to request the permission back. Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and we hope to see you again soon.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]