User talk:SuperAnth
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
Thanks for uploadingFile:Keith Laumer younger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriatecopyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice bySTBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.STBotI (talk)15:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:BoloOld2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriatecopyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice bySTBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.STBotI (talk)16:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:Ninya Mae Perna Miss Nevada 1997.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine thelicense and thesource of the file. If you know this information, then you can add acopyright tag to theimage description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.Skier Dude (talk)02:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for getting a third-party opinion regarding your insertion onBattle of Gettysburg. I chose to stay out of the content dispute, urging you instead to seek consensus. I watched your animation and enjoyed it, but understand why Hal would prefer the link stay out. Bottom line is that linking to our own created content off-wiki can tend to give the appearance of self-interest, despite our best intentions. Please don't let this minor rebuff stand between you and your honest intention to improve the pedia. If I can be of any assistance feel invited to contact me via my talk page. Good luck and don't be easily discouraged.BusterD public (talk)20:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciateyour contributions, including your edits toDharma Initiative, but we cannot acceptoriginal research. Original research also encompassescombining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite areliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Doniago (talk)15:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but you need reliably published sources (such as news articles, interviews) supporting your claim, photos won't cut it.Яehevkor✉00:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atCave Johnson (Portal) shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.Please discuss this issue on the talk page. –RichardBB12:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was listing examples of things that may be true, but are notverifiable and this cannot be used here, even if we both agree that they are undoubtedly true. --Orange Mike |Talk19:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
