Hello Ssbokc,

I wanted to let you know that I just taggedEmad Rahim for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.Kavdiamanju (talk)02:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onEmad Rahim requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be arepost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or usedeletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. --TRPoDaka The Red Pen of Doom03:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleEmad Rahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emad Rahim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.JohnCD (talk)13:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Wiki-PR again". Thank you.JohnCD (talk)15:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing forabusing multiple accounts and probable paid editing (User:Morning277). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.  JohnCD (talk)21:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]