User talk:Skomorokh
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Skomorokh has not edited Wikipediasince 12 December 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  |  |  |  |
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:X5x11-promo.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯04:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedList of works of William Gibson forfeatured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Town of Cats (talk)14:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Draconrex (talk)03:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You are receiving this message because of arecent change to theadministrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at thebureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only throughWP:RFA. Thank you.MBisanztalk00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
hi there, your vote in ArbCom elections triggered a spoof CSRF alarm. Would you be so kind as to please confirm that you actually voted? :) Apologies for the inconvenience.Pundit|utter07:34, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been mentioned atWikipedia:Missing WikipediansOttawahitech (talk)02:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thanks for tagging this page for notability back in 2008. You may want to consider taking it to AfD or the Notability Noticeboard to get it resolved. Best wishes,Boleyn (talk)09:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thanks for tagging this for notability back in 2008. It's still tagged 5 years later. You may want to take it to the Notability Notceboard or AfD to get it resolved. Best wishes,Boleyn (talk)08:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for everything, mate; hope you come back around sometime in the future.ResMar21:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Senator2029 ➔leave me a message01:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onJewellery store, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
A tag has been placed onJewelery store, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. –PartTimeGnome(talk |contribs)00:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hamnett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Vulgaris editions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Malconfort (talk)01:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)23:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onWilton Castle,(near Redcar), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a requesthere.Stuffed cat (talk)23:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ТимофейЛееСуда.19:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Objectivism talk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.RL0919 (talk)01:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now, here is a name I have not seen in a long time. Your return, if return it be, is a welcome sight. I hope that you have been well. ---The Old JacobiteThe '4517:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I stumbled acrossUser:Skomorokh/Sapeurs because it is getting quite a few views according tohttps://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/?locale=en&lang=%&project=&page=&datefrom=0000-00-00&type=user and it is topping the google search for "sapeurs" (seehttps://www.google.com/search?q=sapeurs). Would you be okay with moving it to mainspace, to get it out from under normal user sandbox courtesy concerns?Sadads (talk)23:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you can return to theSignpost again. You aremissed! --Pine✉05:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The articleStudies in Mutualist Political Economy has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.LK (talk)10:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Memorial has been nominated for merging withTemplate:Obituary. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Thanks for creatingNobody for President, Skomorokh!
Wikipedia editorTheMagikCow just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
A good start. Well done - the article is referenced acceptably.
To reply, leave a comment on TheMagikCow'stalk page.
Learn more aboutpage curation.
Since you've done a lot of work onNothing, I was wondering if you could help build an article on the rather abstract concept ofSomething. Cheers!bd2412T03:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectWikipedia:DECIDER. Since you had some involvement with theWikipedia:DECIDER redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.John Vandenberg(chat)02:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)23:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)22:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have created an article stub on space scientist andPadma Shri award winner,Sundaram Ramakrishnan. Understand you have deleted a page on him earlier. I believe Padma Shri award gives him the notability perWP:ANYBIO and his contributions to Indian space programme support the claim. Please correct me if I am wrong. --jojo@nthony (talk)10:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectWololo. Since you had some involvement with theWololo redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.BDD (talk)20:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
History of Somalia (1991–2006), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.AHeneen (talk)08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Anarchopedia has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Ricky81682 (talk)06:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectCrypto-Bismarckian. Since you had some involvement with theCrypto-Bismarckian redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.The Theosophist (talk)10:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:NNDB has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Jytdog (talk)21:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Skomorokh, I'm working on the TFA text now. Hope to see you back here some day. - Dank (push to talk)19:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Librivox has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits20:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
William Gibson
Thank you for quality articles on films such asHotel Chevalier, and people, such asWilliam Gibson, with related featured lists, forthoughtful edit summaries from the beginning, for your "bleak, noir" simple user page, - repeating from 11 November 2009: you are anawesome Wikipedian!
Three year ago, you were recipient no.1471 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk)05:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Cite SEP/old has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits10:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectObama regime. Since you had some involvement with theObama regime redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)01:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Dailybleed has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar22:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Anarchist Library text has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectWikipedia:DUTY. Since you had some involvement with theWikipedia:DUTY redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)00:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Cohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.czar07:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.ShakespeareFan00 (talk)14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectAdditional materials on Che Guevara. Since you had some involvement with theAdditional materials on Che Guevara redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Steel1943 (talk)21:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectPopular culture in popular culture. Since you had some involvement with thePopular culture in popular culture redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.NYKevin01:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectManichaean paranoia. Since you had some involvement with theManichaean paranoia redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Rhadow (talk)17:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd May until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)20:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Anarcho-inadjectivists has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar17:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The articleRusty String Quartet has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article topic lackssignificant coverage fromreliable,independent sources(?) or at least enough to build a full article. No suitable merge/redirect targets: not mentioned atCrimethInc. nor are there sources to warrant doing so.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.czar14:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The articleStone Hotel has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article topic lackssignificant coverage from multiple,reliable,independent sources(?) or at least enough to build an article that does justice to the topic. No suitable merge/redirect targets—not mentioned atCrimethInc. nor are there sources to warrant doing so.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.czar14:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template:CrimethInc. sidebar has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar14:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template:CrimethInc. has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar14:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectTemplate:WikiProject Irish Literature. Since you had some involvement with theTemplate:WikiProject Irish Literature redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)14:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated the "bottom"Template:Letters of Plato template for deletion, because its information is now a subset of the larger templateTemplate:Plato navbox.MinnesotanUser (talk)01:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Naxalite and Maoist groups in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Fire and Ice17:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Article discussions has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Pkbwcgs (talk)21:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectWikipedia:ANNIE. Since you had some involvement with theWikipedia:ANNIE redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so.Softlavender (talk)03:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Infoshops has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Mujinga (talk)22:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectTemplate:Econ. Since you had some involvement with theTemplate:Econ redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so.Magioladitis (talk)10:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Awards table2 has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Awards table. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --/Alex/2112:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Awards table3 has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Awards table. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --/Alex/2112:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Awards table4 has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Awards table. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --/Alex/2112:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Anarchyfd has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.czar14:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The articleKonrad (assassin) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character with no evidence of notability. Fails NPLOT, NFICTION, GNG. BEFORE fails to find any discussion that goes beyond mention in passing/plot summary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here07:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The articleRei Toei has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character with no evidence of notability. Fails NPLOT, NFICTION, GNG. BEFORE fails to find any discussion that goes beyond mention in passing/plot summary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here07:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onFree Territory (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is anorphaned disambiguation page which either
Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Pkbwcgs (talk)09:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The articleDeterritorial Support Group has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NCORP. Only significant coverage I can find is the first Guardian piece.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.buidhe16:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectOriginal content. Since you had some involvement with theOriginal content redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so.Paul_012 (talk)09:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
I enjoyed havingthe TFA yesterday, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirectAnarchism in Somalia. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 18#Anarchism in Somalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Grnrchst (talk)22:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirectWikipedia:CRISIS. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#Wikipedia:CRISIS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.SITH(talk)18:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Admin's Barnstar |
| Your message on the IAR signing was very well delivered (2010) You've done so much more as well.I thank you.xdude (talk)15:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirectWikipedia:MANDARINS. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 17#Wikipedia:MANDARINS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Kokopelli7309 (talk)22:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me in getting this Draft Published.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood#Dar zubair05:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/2010 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Q28 (talk)06:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:ACE2021 discussion has beennominated for merging withTemplate:ACE discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Izno (talk)06:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectUlster unionist and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Ulster unionist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Heanor (talk)19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAbstract particulars has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Just a dictionary definition of one of Hegel's terms - the linked Stanford article isn't even related.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk)07:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Anarchist FAQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAbstract particulars has beenproposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Ten Pound Hammer •(What did I screw up now?)22:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectWikipedia:EDITS and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 27#Wikipedia:EDITS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Q28 (talk)12:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectWikipedia:EDITS and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 12#Wikipedia:EDITS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Ｑ₂₈ (talk)00:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectSir Rock Obama and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Sir Rock Obama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.TartarTorte19:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectWikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/N&N and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 17 § Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/N&N until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.jp×g00:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Acting white has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Onegreatjoke (talk)21:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectWikipedia:RFD? has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 21 § Wikipedia:RFD? until a consensus is reached.TartarTorte17:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Skomorokh. I'm just posting to let you know thatList of awards and nominations received by William Gibson – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page asToday's featured list for October 2. The TFL blurb can be seenhere. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or atTFL talk. Regards,Giants2008 (Talk)22:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Skomorokh/thekidinafrica, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Skomorokh/thekidinafrica –St.nerol (talk)15:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectWikipedia:KIDINAFRICA has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23 § Wikipedia:KIDINAFRICA until a consensus is reached.LizRead!Talk!22:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectLa Lohan has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 1 § La Lohan until a consensus is reached.Steel1943 (talk)06:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dyer Lum has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Grnrchst (talk)14:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectP:AN/M has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 26 § P:AN/M until a consensus is reached.Utopes(talk /cont)06:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectPrema Kadha(film) has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Prema Kadha(film) until a consensus is reached.Utopes(talk /cont)05:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Anarchist revolution has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Grnrchst (talk)12:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectDiscordian Society has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § Discordian Society until a consensus is reached.Veverve (talk)22:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectBozzer has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 26 § Bozzer until a consensus is reached.A1Cafel (talk)04:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectWikipedia:LOCKED has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 2 § Wikipedia:LOCKED until a consensus is reached.Justjourney (talk |contribs)00:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg%26amp%3baction%3dedit%26amp%3bredlink%3d1){kind=link}
