User talk:SirBrahms
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi SirBrahms! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!gobonobo+c17:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
gobonobo+c17:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!10:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk)17:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~Liancetalk13:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadeacontributionstalk07:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadeacontributionstalk09:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Hi SirBrahms, I'm Bonadea, known from such talk page posts as "Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina anophthalma has been accepted". Thank you for creating these species drafts! Since there are usually no issues with them, there is no real reason for you to create them as drafts to be submitted and reviewed by other editors – you are welcome to create articles without going through the Articles for Creation process, though you may of course keep using AfC if you prefer. Personally, when I create a new article (which is not very often), I first create it as a draft in mysandbox and move it to encyclopedia space when I think it's ready for that.
One thing I wanted to mention, which many editors are not aware of, is that when you cite a journal article, the "page" parameter should be the page(s) where the information is supported. It is by no means a major issue if the parameter shows the range of pages for the article in the publication, the way references in journal articles do, but it's better to use the parameter correctly since that helps the reader locate the information more quickly!More information here. Regards, --bonadeacontributionstalk10:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ratnahastin(talk)09:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Hi @SirBrahms. Our paths seem to have crossed, whilst working on the genusIais. I note that you have posted the same question on three fora asking for help with templates, admittedly you were redirected twice. The first time you asked the question, you provided examples of what you regarded 'good' -Iais chilense and 'bad' -Janiridae. I have looked at these pages, and whilst they both access the WoRMS database, they do in different ways: 'Good' uses the right way with {{Cite WoRMS}}; 'Bad' attempts to do the same thing using {{Cite journal}} which is probably not supported and definitely not advisable.
So, I would sayWP:be bold and change it yourself. As long as you follow the syntax inTemplate:Cite WoRMS and make your edits in good faith, you are doing the right thing and improving the encyclopaedia. I make corrections like this all the time.Here is how I changed it (although, that was from {{cite web}} but you should get the idea). I hope that answers your question, if not; I hope the fora come through for you!Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk)20:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I updated the lede and am pinging you as you requested. Thanks!!!Gb321 (talk)06:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changes made! Notifying you as requested.Gb321 (talk)20:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if you noticed my messages that I made the changes
 | The Minor Barnstar | |
| Your noteworthy contribution (5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation.Vacant0(talk •contribs)19:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may addCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the ongoingGA backlog drive; it runs until the end of January. You are receiving this message because yousigned up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk)01:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may addCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In this edit ...https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giant_isopod&diff=next&oldid=1233312858... Did you accidentally add that2 in<ref name="LowryDempsey2" />? If so, I'vefixed it. — Anon423 (talk)01:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]