User talk:LUUWDA
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
No you aren't, try contributing to the encyclopedia.Batbert (talk)09:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SinceSpecial:Ancientpages is a special page, it cannot be updated by ordinary editors (even administrators). You may want to post a bug onbugzilla to request that it be updated, but campaigning on the wiki itself won't accomplish anything. —Random83214:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO04:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
|
Another editor has added the{{prod}} template to the articleCarré D'agneau, suggesting that it be deleted according to theproposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see alsoWikipedia:What Wikipedia is not andWikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues atits talk page. If you remove the{{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent toWikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.BJBot (talk)16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I happened to notice something rather odd while browsing through some pages.This appears to be a little-used IP address using your signature in a welcome template. It could be a good-faith mistake or confusion, or it might be something else. I just thought you might want to know about it.Pyrospirit (talk ·contribs)19:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you know that all edits made by wikipedian editors to wikipedia are released under the terms of the GFDL, so you can't claim text as yours. If you're gonna put it here; any text you submit can be modified; built upon; deleted; changed; moved; turned into an article; ect.- -[The Spooky One] |[tcr]05:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please,assume good faith. It looked to me like you were merely posting to get something more popular on Digg. Have a nice day! :)22:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep posting links to articles that don't exist? What is the point of that? If you think those articles should exist, then write them;then link to them.Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't make that up. Please go and readWikipedia:No original research, which is one of our most important policies. It basically says what you wrote in the edit summary: We can't include something you've just seen on TV, unless you actually cite the source (the news report). If you would've seen something as an eye witness instead, for example, we couldn't include what you've seen at all, unless reliable sources report what you've seen, too. --Conti|✉12:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Original research is theory, etc. without reliable sources to back them up. The age-check page is source enough, which reinforces the fact that it's solid fact.Moreover, original research ≠ solid fact, as proven here. --Let UsUpdateSpecial:Ancientpages.21:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please, you've been around Wikipedia long enough to know that what you're doing is wrong. Wikipedia is not censored: we are here to report the facts, even if they are uncomfortable ones. I don't know whether people with AS are more likely to be pedophiles and/or murderers than NT's; having a guy who was both on a list of people with AS does not provide us with an answer to that question. To omit his entry on the list, however, is censorship. If you question Dante's diagnosis, then let's discuss it. Adding an unreliable link claiming Woody Allen has AS is not the right thing to do. I would like to warn you also that you are on the verge of violatingWP:3RR and I will not revert your last edit for this reason.Talk/Contributions01:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I'm pretty much always on IRC. I will be going to bed in an hour or so though so if you want to talk to me today please come in soon.Talk/Contributions02:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to join the race to get the 3,000,000th article, you'd better hurry, because it's due to go up tonight. My apologies if you missed out on your chance. --SoapTalk/Contributions23:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add content like you did onEllis Lankster, this is againstWP:BLP as it isWP:Undue weight on a minor incident, and lacks reliable sources. ThankyouMartin451 (talk)23:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits toIPad, but we cannot acceptoriginal research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite areliable source for all of your information. Thank you. GSK (talk ●evidence)08:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
GreetingsLUUWDA, I see you're up foradoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, justask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Happy editing -Draeco (talk)02:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{adoptoffer}}
Hi there, LUUWDA. Just a note regarding theFMyLife article. In your counter-undo summary, you said "many website articles talk about spin-offs, and how/why they're spin-offs in the first place. This is fine. GMH was created because of FML". Unfortunately, your addition falls into the category of link-farming, since all you provide is a link to a site which is largely unrelated in practical value to FML, and doesn't establish a plausibly notable connection to FML. It's for this reason that several other similar additions have been reverted in the past couple of weeks alone, as they are largely gratuitous and irrelevant to the article itself. Please seeWP:EL for some more detail. The fact that some other articles also violate convention doesn't set a precedent, however. Thanks.KaySL (talk)04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such asAbu Yedda, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with ourpolicies. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.01:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It might not have been a hoax, in which case could you please contain your writing to a formal encyclopedic style. Your contributions are valued by the community but this is not the Lonely Planet Guide and they will attract less negative perception or risk of deletion if you drop the light hearted banter. It would be great if you could please clean up what I had left in it. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk)17:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onShawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.JDDJS (talk)03:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nuff saidJDDJS (talk)04:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onShawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.jsfouche ☽☾Talk06:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAbu Yedda has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.jsfouche ☽☾Talk06:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed aspeedy deletion tag fromShawn Ahmed, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page'stalk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.jsfouche ☽☾Talk07:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onShawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.jsfouche ☽☾Talk07:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not removespeedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did withShawn Ahmed. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page'stalk page. Thank you.Use the article's talk page to discuss the speedy deletion of this page. AfD is not necessary when CSD are met.jsfouche ☽☾Talk07:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(An accusation was made by some individuals.) --Let UsUpdateWikipedia: Dusty Articles07:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleTemple Riders is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Riders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs)16:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAOL Answers is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/AOL Answers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.06:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page,Gaddafi's drain. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page -Death of Muammar Gaddafi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged forspeedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out atDeath of Muammar Gaddafi - you might like to discuss new information atthe article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest thearticle creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.andy (talk)11:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 New page patrol –Survey Invitation Hello LUUWDA! TheWMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please clickHERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please seeNPP Survey |
The articleRolltop computer has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. (talk)08:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onRolltop computer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.Zzaffuto118 (talk)09:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The articleMichael Swaim has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly createdbiographies of living persons must have at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Malcolma (talk)11:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCloud Atlas (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesFusion andSouth Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We needyou! | |
|---|---|
 | HiLUUWDA! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at theWorld Digital Library, a project of theLibrary of Congress andUNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participatehere. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
Template:User pyongyang, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User pyongyang and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofTemplate:User pyongyang during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Ansh66609:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, LUUWDA, and thank you for your contributions!
I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on,List of defunct companies, is copied from another Wikipedia page, List of business failures. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:
You can do this now byediting the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.
If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at thehelp desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.
Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia!MadmanBot (talk)19:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you!DemocraticLuntz (talk)20:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onFreerice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a requesthere.K6ka (talk |contribs)16:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectInsurgent attack on Fort Hood. Since you had some involvement with theInsurgent attack on Fort Hood redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.BDD (talk)20:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is in mainspace. I see you have a version in your userspace and it seems to contain some superior information. Perhaps you could merge it?Candleabracadabra (talk)18:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectGiappone. Since you had some involvement with theGiappone redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.TheChampionMan123411:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectDoolb. Since you had some involvement with theDoolb redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.JZCL18:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Col-6 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Frietjes (talk)16:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAlorica has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here11:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi LUUWDA,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, thecurrent system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user groupNew Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - mostcurrent experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now atNew Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectPjongjang. Since you had some involvement with thePjongjang redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)00:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectCholima(magazine). Since you had some involvement with theCholima(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Headbomb {t ·c ·p ·b}20:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAbu Yedda has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lacks since 2010 of sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.CommanderWaterford (talk)10:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectKawasockie and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Kawasockie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Engr.SmittyWerben21:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectOld Libya and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 9 § Old Libya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —kashmīrī TALK09:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectList of petpets has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 3 § List of petpets until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer413:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectList of Petpets has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 3 § List of Petpets until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer413:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
