Hello, Shivlingam, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using theArticle Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!^[1]--Shivlingam (talk)12:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivlingam!Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check outGetting Help below, ask me onmy talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember tosign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in theedit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!RedtigerxyzTalk13:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial •Our five pillars •Getting mentored How to:edit a page •upload and use images •create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia •Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions •Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view •No original research Verifiability •Reliable sources •Citing sources What Wikipedia is not •Biographies of living persons List of policies •Three-revert rule •Sock puppetry Copyrights •Policy for non-free content •Image use policy External links •Spam •Vandalism •List of guidelines Deletion policy •Conflict of interest •Notability The community Build consensus •Resolve disputes Assume good faith •Civility •Etiquette No personal attacks •No legal threats Community portal •Village pump Signpost •IRC channels •Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing •Develop an article The perfect article •Manual of style Stubs •Categories •Disambiguation Pages needing attention •Peer review Miscellaneous User name •User pages •Talk pages Clean up:General •Spam •Vandalism Join a WikiProject •Translation Useful templates •Tools •User scripts

Welcome on behalf onWikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. Your contributions will help Hinduism articles grow.--Redtigerxyz^Talk13:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivlingam. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topicWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_barnstars. Thank you. --NeilN^{talk ♦contribs}00:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Until you have a successful RFA or RFB, kindly do not add categories that may lead users to believe that you are an administrator or bureaucrat. Misrepresentation of this nature isdisruptive. –xeno^talk13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What aboutWP:GFDL ?--owner wikipedia (talk)13:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL means you can re-use text but it doesn't mean you can use that text to misrepresent your position at Wikipedia. You should change your signature as well. –xeno^talk13:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can use the text whereeverI WANT besides my signature is kept because it is considered humorous.Why do you and your band of hooligans (That is the only word I could use AGF ) stalk me day and night You revert ALL my edits even if they are well referenced–ME^Talk13:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you cease making disruptive edits (including an inappropriate signature that misrepresents your position), I'm sure you'll notice you receive fewer messages from other users. –xeno^talk13:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My edits have never been disruptive .I've never (NEVER) added false info into an article. You guys hate me and never assume agf I donna who supported you in your RFA .–ME^Talk13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will start assuming good faith as soon as you stop misrepresenting yourself in your signature - in particular, stop signing as"owner wikipedia". Please consider this a formal warning. –xeno^talk13:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)(Removing the false barnstars would help too, but those are less problematic)[reply]

(edit conflict)Gosh I think I'll wait for the final warning nah Gonna change it SEE --I do not own [[WP]] (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Happy ?.–ME^Talk13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for agreeing not to misrepresent yourself in your signature. –xeno^talk13:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.. some of what you're doing is what we call "ruleslawyering" - seeWP:LAWYER. It's not a very helpful way to behave. It would be best if you just stayed away from the administrator's noticeboard, until you're more familiar with how Wikipedia works.Friday(talk)14:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HiME^Talk13:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you bought a "Congressional Medal of Honor" from eBay, would you be entitled to actuallywear it? Barnstars are earned, not taken. Same thing with adminship and ownership of Wikipedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track)15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked indefinitely from editing fordisruptive editing and apparent sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified, you maycontest this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read ourguide to appealing blocks first.SarekOfVulcan (talk)14:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Shivlingam(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What's the reason behind this ban I (Allegedly } disruptively edited my talk page COME on it's my page which I can edit ,Apparent sp? --I do not own [[WP]] (talk)15:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your signature implies you're here to make aWP:POINT, your edits imply you're unusually familiar with Wikipedia for a new user, and your edits are similar to those of a banned user. I'm going to take a look now to see what other accounts I can find.Hersfold^(t/a/c)15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Shivlingam(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I changed my sig according to a discussion above --[[User:Shivlingam|I do not ownWP ]] (talk) 15:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Xeno approved my new signature *1 You do not have evidence of me being a SP *2 You do not have evidence of my disruptive editing on articles This is what I get for being friendly I tried helping users on the help page they reverted my edits I tried to ask people for verifiable references onlingam they reverted it.I added information (reliable and referenced ) onSaffron Terror they removed it can you explain those reverts onsaffron terror .Leave that aside They called me on ANI I saw an IP being blocked even though it did not edit after level a level 4 warning ,That was the last straw Questioning a sys ops action is on wp is considered as a bannable offense and they banned me for thatNote my banning was mentioned on the discussion about that IP instead of the discussion going on about my own user space

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reason given; no evidence that you have disavowed your disruptive behavior.OhNoitsJamie^Talk19:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Shivlingam(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As perhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ani#58.174.227.190 BAN my SOCKMASTER [[User:Shivlingam|I do not ownWP ]] (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No unblock request made. –xeno^talk18:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's an uncomfortable amount of Myspacing going on between this account,Notedgrant (talk ·contribs),Coldplay Expert (talk ·contribs), andGuitarherochristopher (talk ·contribs). If I had to guess, the lot of you might know each other, offline. It's all well and great to be friends, I welcome and encourage it, but please be sure that you're all mostly here to work on an encyclopedia, not a social call. There are plenty of places you can hang out for fun on the web, if that's all you're after. –Luna Santin (talk)18:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the timings of this users edits I think banning him was uncalled forhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#58.174.227.190 --I do not own [[WP]] (talk)15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CAN you PLEASE review the illegitimate banning of the ip address above --I do not own [[WP]] (talk)15:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks clear cut. Nobody actually has to be warned before being blocked, depending on the level of disruption. That IP was actually warned. Should have been blocked long ago. (talk→ BWilkins ←track)15:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's new I think I gotta get my pills out before I lose IT HECK --I do not own [[WP]] (talk)15:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do I know you?--NotedGrantTalk19:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]