Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Shaggy if your interested I've put together a page of questions so that I can see what you do/dont know from there I'll be able to offer some specific advice on areas to focus on.User:Gnangarra/Sandbox/Q's/Shaggy has been created just answer the question as best you can where you dont know say so.Gnangarra04:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gnangarra/Sandbox/Q's/Shaggy#Discussion_Pages I left some comment there, can you expand the discussion pages, these are the areas that at RFA editors will be looking to see participation. what we can do is pick one and we'll look at how it works.Gnangarra09:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create a generic email account with someone like gmail.Gnangarra00:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J Di is not vandalising his talk page, he simply has a policy of not removing other people's vandalism from his talk page, and reverting any removals, hence his message at the top "please do not remove or revert messages that appear to be vandalism". He has not vandalised his own page. Please consider taking back your warnings, thanks.^anemone|_projectors14:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the Chinese version of those articles get the ratings from? Cause those Chinese articles didn't cite sources and other Wikipedias can't be used as sources as perWikipedia:Verifiability: "Articles and posts on Wikipedia may not be used as sources." --Silver Edge (talk)05:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I won't pursue this any further. --Silver Edge (talk)08:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get what you mean now, go on, you might even want to push for GA status.Dengero (talk)05:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

I do not think Linda's name should be put in the main credits because she belonged to the peripheral part of the story. If people like Raymond, Tavia, Michelle Yim etc. do not get their names on the main actors' list, I do not see why this should be the case for Linda Chung.

Neither did I delete information pertaining to the story. Like I mentioned earlier, I deleted biased evaluation of the character.

Also, you will restrict your comments to what I have done is related to Heart Of Greed, not what to do. I'm sorry, are you qualified to tell me how to do things? Because I don't think so, this is not your personal webpage/crusade, and it comes off as extremely obnoxious. This is your first warning.

--Avrillys (talk) 06 06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:Supertriosupreme.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.STBotI (talk)10:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heyyi agree that dicksmith is a large retailer, but if you havent been to the actual thing at doncaster, it is relatively small compared to other large retailers such as jb hifi and is in osme cases smalelr than other small retailers such as glue store and the newsagentbut i guess i wont change it cos u hav a point ther, ur choicebye mate Thfrang 11:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)ps. r u from melb or sumwher else?

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For tirelessly working on pages for Hong Kong TV series'. Even I admit, it's a ridiculously repetitive job.Dengero (talk)03:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed your contributions to various TVB articles, so I'm wondering if you'd be interested in contributing toWikiProject Modern Chinese music. There's been discussions about revamping the Wikiproject to include Chinese TV and film, but it kind of died off... so I'm trying to gather interest again to get the thing started. Would you be interested?Skyezx06:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking so long to reply, but yep, the WikiProject will cover Chinese TV... film is, for the time being, still under WikiProject Films. However, the WP has been renamedWikipedia:WikiProject Chinese-language entertainment, and should include everything else, from music, TV, to actors, singers, etc. If you're still interested, you can head over there and sign up... and watch the talk page for discussions. The WP is still a bit shaky, but there are some active members that are willing to particpate in discussions. Hopefully, we can get a project going soon and maybe work together to get some articles (likeTVB or maybe evenHeart of Greed) to GA status. I know, I dream big. =pSkyezx^(talk)04:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered,Image:Westfield.gif, has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on theimage description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.MrHarper (talk)23:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. Basically, Wikipedia is not a repository of everything.WP:NOT. especially what can be easily found elsewhere. at the moment, you've included up to 2005, but where do we stop? 2002? and also we need to be consistent with other AFL club articles. also you will note the policyIn addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader this does not appear. As a guide, I'd suggest you look at some football club (I know they're not AFL)featured articles such ashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leek_Town_F.C.#Statistics_and_records orhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusaders_%28rugby%29 thanksMichellecrisp (talk)06:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is neccessary for this info to be displayed if there is need of it, at the moment, there is. That is your opinion. I don't think you've demonstrated the need. as I said you previously provided no context for this in the article. Someone scanning it through it like me, wonders why season stats from the last 3 seasons are in the middle of the article.Michellecrisp (talk)07:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's better, thanks for your cooperation. Have a good weekend.Michellecrisp (talk)07:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,List of Heart of Greed episodes, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Heart of Greed episodes. Thank you.Do you want toopt out of receiving this notice?Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at22:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy9872004,

I see that you are working very diligently on the TVB related articles. Therefore, I have an idea. Should we start a Wikiproject namely "WikiProject TVB"? You can invite other Wikipedia members to join. Please reply. Thanks!

Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at17:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) The articleMoonlight Resonance was listed at the copyright problems board with respect to the plot summary copied fromthis source. Given your note in edit summaryhere, I wanted to just drop you a personal note to explain my removal of this material. In our non-free content guidelines, the section titled "acceptable use" explains a bit when quotations may become infringement. You're quite correct that sources must becited and authorship attributed. But even if we cite, attribute and properly mark the text, we can't use too much of material in order to comply withfair use. (For a good external site overview of copyright, you may want to visitStanford University's site.) We can only use brief quotations from a source (determined by ratio to overall size) as necessary to supplement our own text. Of course, you're welcome to base a new plot summary written in your own words on that site and may include brief quotations from it if necessary. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl^(talk)12:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your award ^^Dengero (talk)11:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion relating to the actions of User:Brisbanelionsfan1, at theWikipedia:Administrators noticeboard. As you have been involved in an editing dispute on the Brisbane Lions article I thought you might want to comment. Cheers.Jevansen (talk)12:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFile:Westfield.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatantcopyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Bidgee (talk)07:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. The nominated article isMatt Tilley. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see alsoWikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Tilley (2nd nomination). Please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by abot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk)01:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing atwo-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are notautoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to onlya small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located atSpecial:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obviousvandalism orBLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (seeWikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be foundhere.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.Courcelles (talk)18:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You consult the Talk Page should you wish to take part in the discussion on the moving of this article. You do not move it without the input from others and until a valid conclusion is reached.Hallows Horcruxes (talk)10:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:BrisLionsDesign.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.LGA _talk^edits21:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:2010 Brisbane Lions.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)20:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:50 points scene in MR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic06:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:We're Moving.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Lucky- The Wedge DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:That's Valid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Thanks For Coming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:HOGDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:MRDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)12:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The articleList of upcoming TVB dramas has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources to support this as aWP:LISTTOPIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.UnitedStatesian (talk)16:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of upcoming TVB dramas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of upcoming TVB dramas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.UnitedStatesian (talk)03:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007 TVB has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.The Banner talk20:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 TVB has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.The Banner talk20:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]