User talk:sgeureka
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Two things to be aware of when commenting here:
|
 Archives |
Archive 1 (Feb 2007 – Dec 2007) |
Welcome!
Hello, Sgeureka, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Tone11:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of Emergency! characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Emergency! characters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article....William, is the complaint department really onthe roof?22:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The articleJordan Orr has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable actor who has only had minor roles.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Erpertblah, blah, blah...04:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Money Heist expert! |
| Thanks for taking a lead role on getting Money Heist to GA - I knew it was worthy of such after you got to it! Hope to see you back at it for part 4! :)Vaselineeeeeeee★★★00:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
I don’t see any particular place to request it, so could you remove my rollback privileges if you’re able? I don’t really use them, and I’m worried about accidentally using it because I edit from my phone so often.TTN (talk)14:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)06:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I actually started my wiki career long ago with some fiction fancruft. But these days I think wikia is a much better place for them. The problem with a 'universe of' type of article is that it should be properly referenced, and also discuss the real world significance (inspiration, impact, etc.). For example, I was surprised butInterstellar Network News is surprisingly good and may even stand on its own. But few other articles from that show have reference sufficient to be worth merging. As such, I'd rather prune most of them. If at some point someone wants to create a good article about the universe, they likely won't have much use for cruft we are deleting. It is also worth noting thatStar Wars universe redirects to SW. SW is one of the most popular franchises, with a ton of fans, and they weren't able/willing to write a universe article.Star Trek universe - ditto. SG getsMythology of Stargate, which I could nitpick, but there are indeed many low hanging fruits so I don't think this needs to be axed now (in the next 10 years, as things are going around here, hmmm). Interestingly, another famous fiction series, Tolkien's Middlearth, doesn't get a universe of article, but getsOutline of Middle-earth. Oh well, for now I will go and kick nest of ants and nominate something from that series for AfD. MaybeSting (Middle-earth)... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here12:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hey, if possible and not too much of a hassle for you, I'd appreciate if you can leave me a note if you merge episodes back into the season/list pages. I've been working on cleaning and sorting episode redirects and I just noticed the Babylon 5 episodes were converted by seeing the template at TfD, and that specifically was a series I checked off my list so would not have seen it otherwise. Would appreciate it. Thanks! --Gonnym (talk)19:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up atthe contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk)21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you went through almost all of them. Frankly, I'd think most of the main cast should be notable. Most of them have a chapter each inFrom Starship Captains to Galactic Rebels: Leaders in Science Fiction Television (see[1]). For Delenn/SI/LA, consider[2]. Other sources:[3]. I know I started this with going after the supporting characters, but I think for the main cast, an AfD would be appropriate (and I think I'd vote keep for some of them, actually). PS. I have rested 3-4 articles that I think may be notable and should at least to to AfD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here06:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like something that should be prodded and deleted, unless you feel like merging and soft delete/redirecting first? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here09:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for providing a closing rationale at that AfD. Do you think we can also redirect in the same fashion two other articles I mention (and that are even more minor), i.e.Minor places in Beleriand andMinor places in Arda? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here08:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for adeletion review ofList of Forgotten Realms deities. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.AugusteBlanqui (talk)10:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The spacecraft names, the ship names in the Culture series, are part of what makes the series of stories unique. They're obviously chosen with a good deal of care and gentle humour - can the list be reinstated?Mike Lacey, UK 22:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byMikeLacey (talk •contribs)
Please reinstate the list. The Culture series is notable beyond a small fan base, the naming of it's minds contributes to its appeal and uniqueness and it's personally one of my most often referenced pages on wikipedia. The tracker and ad infested wiki of fandom is no replacement for it. Wikipedia just got poorer to me after reading up on the deletions going on.— Precedingunsigned comment added by80.131.177.100 (talk)11:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After spending an hour trying to find out what happened to this page I am wondering why it doesn't show up as deleted in the deletion log or has the usual "Deleted Page" notice when opened through the various links that are still around on the internet (e.g. news.ycombinator.com has discussions about it, duckduckgo still finds it). Would it not be nicer for everyone if it was easier to find out what happened?(Note I am not trying to discuss why it was deleted or whether it should or should not be restored. I understand why it had to be deleted, even if it makes me sad.)Hn3000 (talk)21:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of starships in Stargate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of starships in Stargate (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.TTN (talk)12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After cleaning up the categories, looking atCategory:WikiProject Television descendant projects it seems that these are possible candidates to convert to TV task forces:
What do you think? --Gonnym (talk)19:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regardingthis edit: can you please provide attribution for the copied text, as described inWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia? Thanks very much!isaacl (talk)18:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This may sound like a crazy idea, but I was already partly thinking of this before your post at theWT:FICT discussion made me think of it a bit more seriously, but is there any easy way to document the history of fictional areas (like STARGATE and MIDDLE-EARTH) that were crufty but survived for ages and have a long history that could be documented? And would there be any interest in that (both from those who edit in such areas and those who might want to read about it in passing)? I suppose a starting point would be a list of articles, of deletion and merger discussions, and the start, middle and end points of various 'deletion' waves? I'd also be interested in tracking the editing activity and stats (e.g. number of editors, number of edits, number of years the articles existed). Page views might also be of interest. It would kind of feel like drawing a line under it, but maybe only in a rudimentary way as doing too much might in itself be a waste of time. But I do think it is important to document things in some way to prevent repetition of the same mistakes. The deletion discussions themselves only give some insight into that.Carcharoth (talk)16:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The worst of both worlds, eh? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here19:19, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It didn’t list the main crew members who died and you placed Bourne, Deon, Strassi and Mason Freeman were adversaries. Also, Brody was main cast for season 2 and the first seven episodes of season 3, while “Causalities” can mean injury or death so “Fatalities” is a better word.— Precedingunsigned comment added by96.56.20.130 (talk)23:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add back the pages for the characters by season as well as the recurrings. It'll help show stuff like who lived and who died.— Precedingunsigned comment added byRiders&Rangers (talk •contribs)17:15, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectMeet the Browns (TV sreies). Since you had some involvement with theMeet the Browns (TV sreies) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67800:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Check out my workhere. If you are interested you can collaborate. --Kasper2006 (talk)05:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
--Kasper2006 (talk)06:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] | The Million Award |
| For your contributions to bringMoney Heist (estimated annual readership:3,900,000) toGood Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers!Reidgreg (talk)12:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
The articleDan Lerner has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable TV director
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Cardiffbear88 (talk)13:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AtWikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements. Some stuff is getting relisted. We could use more comments from the experienced editors. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here07:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Game of Thrones wars and battles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here01:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Today, thank you forCharacters of Carnivàle, introduced (in 2008): "As far as I could determine in the last 6 months, the information that he gave there is unavailable anywhere else except for fan forums that copy-pasted his messages, so I ref'ed his original messages"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC), introduced (in 2008): "As far as I could determine in the last 6 months, the information that he gave there is unavailable anywhere else except for fan forums that copy-pasted his messages, so I ref'ed his original messages"! --Gerda Arendt (talk)06:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Why did you delete the Stargate Program article? The article does not only write about the characters, it is a general view of the development of the Program. I think it is useful for a better understanding of the series and I think it should exist.Andypos (talk)23:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is to let you know that theCharacters of Carnivàle article has been scheduled astoday's featured article for July 19, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so atWikipedia:Today's featured article/July 19, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlistWikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks!Jimfbleak -talk to me?14:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations |July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly (clothing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
--RoySmith(talk)16:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedCharacters of Carnivàle for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meetsfeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Mjroots (talk)03:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedList of Carnivàle episodes for featured list removal. Pleasejoin the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Hog FarmTalk05:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Arecently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to removeAutopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as withEdit Filter Manager, choose toself-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit theAdministrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest inCOVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Alexbrn (talk)05:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations |January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofWikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an adminwill still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working onbetter tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you canread more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you cansubscribe tothe weekly technical newsletter.
We havetwo suggested ways this identity could work.We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You canlet us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with newactivity requirements following a successfulRequest for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
| Good article nominations |June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Howard Klein (television producer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Jamiebuba (talk)08:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMythology of Stargate, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythology of Stargate (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectCisphobia has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 17 § Cisphobia until a consensus is reached.Duckmather (talk)05:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Friends has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedCarnivàle for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)18:58, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]