User talk:Ryecatcher773
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| Main | My Userbox Gallery | My Talk Page |
Actually, it means that I'm the project's most glorified paper-pusher; but we'll just ignore that point. ;-)
I have no problems with moving it to the official name of the unit; you may want to insert a footnote into the article after the name to indicate that it is, in fact, the correct order, so that future editors don't feel compelled to fix it. Personally, I think we should expand out the abbreviation (3rd United States Infantry Regiment), but I'll leave that up to your discretion. In the long term, I think we're going to have to try and come up with some actually usable guideline for how to name these articles, reconciling the use of official names with a sensible placement of "United States" when it's inserted for disambiguation purposes; but that's a rather broader issue.Kirill Lokshin02:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, hopefully this title will prevail... it is Wikipedia, so it's not set in stone. I just wish that people could understand how important this stuff is to those of us who served, you know? Some people get so caught up in standards and formats that they don't want to look at things on a case-by-case basis. And then, these same people don't even bother to read explanations as to why things are this way, no matter how detailed those explanations may be. Thanks for the vote of confidence though, and thanks for your support on the discussion page too.Ryecatcher77317:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question about this article and I was wondering if you had the answer. I've been going through and correcting the redirects/dabs for the 3d US Infantry to reflect the correct name and new correct article title. I came across this article and I'm afraid I don't know enough about that time period to make an accurate decision about the name inside the unit box. I'm assuming that 3d Infantry Regiment is the 3d U.S. Infantry Regiment (if not, then we have to find which regiment they're talking about and redirect it there) since it was in existence back then of course, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to change the name to reflect the U.S. portion of the name. When did the 3d add the U.S. to its name? Was it during the Civil War or was it there from the beginning? If it didn't change until later, I'm tempted to leave the name in that article as is to reflect the name of the unit at that time. What are your thoughts? --ScreaminEagle17:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recently this article received a "peer review script" examination and mention was made of GA and FA status (Talk: Ohio State Buckeyes football). I invite you to help complete the article and with a little luck and hard work maybe someone will take notice and nominate it for FA (I am not into self-nom for reasons your own "statement of purpose" makes clear). Even if that doesn't happen, the quality of the article itself will improve and make it a showcase for Buckeye football. The history from 1975 to the present is lacking, and in particular we need enthusiastic but encyclopedic writers for the Cooper and Tressl eras. Ultimately I think the History of Ohio State Football will become a main article in its own right. My goal is to get the article "completed" (but far from "finished") by January 8. If you can help, please do, and GO BUCKS. --Buckboard06:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to say, nice job on your edits of the section onA Christmas Story House. Well done!Karen |Talk |contribs02:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 | On28 December,2006,Did you know? was updated with a fact from the articleA Christmas Story House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the"Did you know?" talk page. |
Thank you for your contributions!Nishkid6419:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you can take that much trouble to construct a response you deserve the flag be kept! I did quote the essay as a guideline, not wikipolicy, but, yes, it is just an essay. Take care. --Steve (Slf67) talk05:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for the message, no problem! And I fully agree with the reasoning for your initial edit with the article as it was full of weasel words and clear POV. I had tried adding citation tags to no avail, and it did need a big clean up. Have fun!·Talk23:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what Stemonitis is getting at with regards to his questioning what should be disambiguated. However, I whole heartedly dispute his claim that the game Angband is more relevant in current usage than the place named in Tolkien's work. Although no one else from the game article camp seems to be weighing in on the debate, it would seem that a poll may be needed to reach an agreement. Yes, I realize that in the scope of things, that this is completely a matter of minutiae, but to those of us who have spent the majority of their life (which is, in my case, about 28 of 35 years) reading, researching and studying Tolkien's work as well as the analysis and criticism thereof, I find the issue quite irritating and borderline offensive. The game in question isn't even a game licensed for sale from what I can tell. It's a low-fi game done by someone with a basic knowledge of how to code, on par with what someone might create for a 100-level college computer programming class final project. I'd be surprised to find that any permission was even asked for (or granted) by Tolkien's estate to use the name Angband for the game. And there is a debate on its importance/relevance on Wikipedia? Not to mention versus one of the greatest writers of the 20th century?Ryecatcher77318:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey RC773,
Email me via my userpage, will ya? I have email options enabled. --ScreaminEagle20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Arequest for mediation has been filed with theMediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request atWikipedia:Requests for mediation/3rd US Infantry, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer toWikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks,Daniel05:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
September 2007 (UTC)
 | ARequest for Mediation to which you were are a party has beenaccepted. You can find more information on the case subpage,Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/3rd US Infantry.
|
Please be advised that a request for arbitration has been filed titled "Article Title for 3rd US Infantry" and you have been named as a party. You are invited to provide input on this request atWikipedia:Requests for arbitration. (I am providing this notification as an arbitration clerk as the filing party overlooked doing so.) Regards,Newyorkbrad15:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to say if you oppose the page move or not--just a friendly reminder.--ScreaminEagle00:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that "Jew" could signify ethnicity or religious affiliation while "Judaism" specifically referred to the religion?Robert K S (talk)23:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for supporting my argument. The irony is, when there was one, the Jewish community in Cleveland (particularly in Glenville) was quite distinguished. Another sign of the times, however: even the Jews in Cleveland Heights particularly along S.Taylor Road, has started to move further out -- Lax & Mandel's, a cornerstone of local Jewish bakeries for years (and of national fame to boot), has relocated a few miles to the northeast, to South Euclid just in the past year. I don't thinkUser:LooDog will care much though -- he's not even a Clevelander from what I can see from his user page.
FYI, you're seeing addresses on the Heights pop up as being in Cleveland due to an old ZIP Code format that included some of the border suburbs as being part of the city for some reason -- South Euclid, where I grew up, is 44121, which shares a splinter of a border with the city and also comes up as Cleveland.Ryecatcher773 (talk)06:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to pep the article up a bit when I get the chance, but do you have any ideas?--Orestek (talk)06:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My feelings on the matter are, I would say, identical to your own. I deleted "traditional" because it is, quite simply, repetitive. And, yes, conciseness is, I would agree, a virtue in almost all writing, certainly writing of an encyclopædic nature. I would be more than happy to argue the point with this other editor. Thanks for your message. Cheers! ---23:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
| This is a Newsletter forWikiProject Ohio. Click [show] to reveal the letter. | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Issue I - Month 2008 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
This newsletter is delivered by bot to allproject members ofWikiProject Ohio. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please note this atthe unsubscribe page. Thank you,§tepshep -Newsletter BotTalk00:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC) The above newsletter was delivered byNewsletterbot as per a request byStepshep[reply]
If you want to help me chooseCategory:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment atWikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger(t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheJune 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheJuly 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)00:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheAugust 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hi, thank you for being a member ofWP:CHICAGO. If you would like to remain as anactive member please note sohere, otherwise mark yourselfinactive orsemi-active. Thank you. If active, put "Active in project since MM/YYYY. Active as of MM/YYYY" where MM and YYYY represent approximate time you joined the project. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page and the last time you confirmed your activity.--TonyTheTiger(t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)18:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply] |
Should we be holding an annual picnic for this event or something?!
I am glad to see it hasn't moved back yet. Perhaps your implied warning did the trick. --ScreaminEagle (talk)20:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryecatcher773 – Thanks for your response re Thomas. Having looked at the recent history, I do wonder if we may indeed be taking on too much!
Articles like this do tend to attract those with an axe (or ax) to grind! The only way of dealing with them is, in my experience, to wait and hope that they go away. Doesn't always work, though! We'll see – I'd like to get a few other friendly and experienced editors on board first, I think. Cheers –Agendum (talk)17:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Last fall you indicated that you continue to be active withWP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be active please update your active date atWikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, we are planning aChicago Meetup. If you will be able to attend the meetup from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West, please sign as an indication of your intent.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)04:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over theconservative support for President Obama inTalk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk)22:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But I'm surprised about something: I would have expected you to delete Hunter S. Thompson's entry from the list. May I ask you what your reasoning was? I rather obviously don't follow it.
Respectfully,<br. />—NBahn (talk)14:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seehttp://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/encanto-gas-holder/2010/may/31/a-torchlight-tattoo-memory-for-memorial-day/ for something on the lighter side about the Old Guard, my first-person recollection. TOGS!Hotfeba (talk)20:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I'd be happy to pitch in on the potential wikiproject, but I don't know if there are enough interested editors to justify its creation. You might want to check withUser:Beirne,User:Bdb484,User:DangApricot, andUser:THD3.User:JonRidinger is in Kent.Category:Wikipedians in Cleveland, Ohio has more potential candidates, although some of them are inactive. -Eureka Lott00:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What do you have in mind?Emjaymem (talk)—Precedingundated comment added18:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Count me in!
Vjmlhds02:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First, thanks for the invite to the Cleveland Wikiproject! Much appreciated!
Wanted to ask a small favor. When you get a chance, do you think you could check out some links for me? I'm havingKent, Ohio reviewed in FAC and there are three links that won't open for the reviewer but open just fine for me on different browsers and different computers. If you have a chance, I would appreciate you checking them out and posting atWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kent, Ohio/archive1 if you can open the links or not. The links are:[1],[2],[3] Thanks! --JonRidinger (talk)21:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the back-and-forth edits onWMMS; I just feel that analog transmission should be included as most every single radio listener listens to radio in that way. I would appreciate your own input on the talk page -- the other use has yet to reply.Levdr1 (talk)22:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to oblige. Cheers.Ryecatcher773 (talk)23:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there Ryecatcher773, thank you for your contributions. I am abot, alerting you thatnon-free files arenot allowed in user or talk space. Iremoved some files I found onUser:Ryecatcher773. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to youruser-space drafts or yourtalk page.
Thank you, --DASHBot (talk)05:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the Project Cleveland now has been broadened to Greater Cleveland. Have we definied the limits? I'm thinking of some of the articles I edit that are Kent-related. Kent is in one of the broader definitions of Greater Cleveland, but it being from here, we usually differentiate between here and the "Cleveland area" even though downtown Cleveland is all of 45 minutes from Kent. I was thinking if we did, then theKent, Ohio andKent State University articles could work. If not, I understand that as well! --JonRidinger (talk)21:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So I finally logged into WP after a year and a half of absence and I noticed you left a message saying "You ought to weigh in on our favorite article for 'controversial' naming conventions..." What was that about? Was it on the main MilHist discussion page? What happened with that? Man, I'm sorry I missed that now. That's what I get for being lazy with regard to my WP account. Dangit! --ScreaminEagle (talk)18:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
| Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We needyou! | |
|---|---|
 | Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the SmithsonianArchives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participatehere, and I look forward to working with you!SarahStierch (talk)00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
 | United States National Archives WikiProject |
|---|---|
|
I added several photos and categorized them. Feel free to add them if you like. Go Arcs! Click here--->[[4]]THD3THD3 (talk)22:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded on your edits and added some more details. I'll try and get some more photos (including the Clark Field dog park, which is huge) in the coming weeks. Have you been back to Cleveland lately? The improvements in areas like Gordon Square, Tremont, and University Circle are impressive - although they retain their gritty character. The outer suburbs, however, are going to pieces.THD3 (talk)14:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking over theKidnappings_of_Amanda_Berry,_Gina_DeJesus,_and_Michelle_Knight page and noticed there are no pictures of Ariel Castro's house. I drove by there once but didn't have my camera. The house is coming down next week, so I'll drive by there today and snap a few pictures. Ugh - not looking forward to this.THD3 (talk)12:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if any guidelines address this, but the license plates of two vehicles are readable in this photo.[6] Little Italy is really hopping at night these days, with crowds of pedestrians and valets handling the vehicle parking. I'll try and get some photos there and at Gordon Square (but not this weekend, I'm staying in the A/C!)THD3 (talk)12:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to see you are on board with adding the public transportation links. I'll follow your format for future museums and attractions. -Kai445 (talk)20:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(This was clear before. Armour Square is both th ename of a neighborhood and the larger area as defined by the city. Ever been here?)Armour Square, Chicago The Community area are not to be confused with the neighborhoods and should not be combined as the same feature.community areas[7] collect census data like population and demographics andneighborhoods[8] that area about colture. They are represented by two different maps and boundaries. you can view the area boundarieshere just customize the legend to showCommunity Development areas , that is why I edited the article. The community areas get their names from the local neighborhoods but do not represent the same thing. I will re edit the article to represent the community area not the neighborhood. A separate section or article should be created to represent the neighborhood. thanks --Nickvet419 (talk)03:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
hmm... what an attack? Is that really needed? Is Wikipedia about personal opinions or facts? I think facts. and the fact is... Community areas were created to have defined areas to chart census data of population and demographics and the articles should reflect that. The neighborhoods themselves should have their own articles as they reflect on the culture of the area and are defined by different boundaries. Armour Square is defined by the city as a community area, and people who live there can clearly say they are from Armour Square, yes. As well as people say they are from the Bridgeport community area. That is fine. But the neighborhood boundaries defined by the City of Chicago are different than the community areas. This is why the neighborhood articles should reflect the neighborhood boundaries and the community area articles should reflect census data and the community area boundaries defined by the City. --Nickvet419 (talk)07:45, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anyways, I'll be back to that article at another time, so you can keep it how you want it for now.--Nickvet419 (talk)07:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please join the discussion atWT:CHICAGO.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)13:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to copy your comment toWT:CHICAGO and then investigate.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)18:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming thatthis user is not you. The account appears to have been created at an IP address resolving to JP Morgan Chase in Columbus, which had been edit warring atMichigan–Ohio State football rivalry. I am passing along the information in case the name thing remains as is, and you want to take it further.JohnInDC (talk)18:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onPipeworks Brewing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards,Cindy(talk to me)07:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)== Nomination ofPipeworks Brewing for deletion ==[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articlePipeworks Brewing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipeworks Brewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Best regards,Cindy(talk to me)13:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added the WikiProject Cleveland template to the Jeff Heathtalk page. Not sure if it's something the group desires. Also, in the future should I want to add the template to other talk pages, what is the protocol for doing such? All I see is to add it to "applicable articles."Zepppep (talk)13:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onFile:RussanRiverBrewingLogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Eeekster (talk)01:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:RussanRiverBrewingLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Hazard-Bot (talk)04:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of Italian American neighborhoods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may not be aware that everything in theWP:LEAD is suppose to be in the main body. When it is not, you should take corrective action to make sure that it is. It is not the other way around. The LEAD summarizes the rest of the article. A third party has volunteered to summarize the article. I will let him have a hand at responding to your edits.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)18:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, Ryecatcher. I'm a regular WP:CFB editor who often works on All-American college football player biographies. The David Molk article is on my watch list, and I've been following the deletion and reversions by you and Tony. The article was already a Good Article, and perWP:LEAD, the lead section should be expected to fairly summarize the contents of the entire article. The bare bones so-called "NFL standard" lead is inadequate for GA purposes. That having been said, it was not a perfect lead and could be pared and better organized. If you and Tony will give me 24 hours, I'll take a crack at paring it and improving it, while leaving something behind that still satisfies the GA standards. Thanks.Dirtlawyer1 (talk)19:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the CFD list for April 23 was not the correct venue to list a new discussiontoday; items are listed by date of nomination regardless of their similarity to already-closed past discussions. Accordingly, I've removed your deletion rationale from the April 23 list and transferred it toWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 May 2 instead.Bearcat (talk)15:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there fellow Chicago fan, I noticed you chimed in on the conversation onhow to improve the Chicago article. I was hoping you could help me clean up themonuments and public art section. As discussed on the talk page, we want to remove the less notable monuments and rewrite the section using prose. You live in Chicago so perhaps you'd be familiar with these monuments and can pinpoint which ones are notable? I am fascinated by Chicago but live in New York so I haven't a clue. If you want to just simply narrow down the list I'll work on the prose part. Thanks! —MusikAnimaltalk02:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I am trying to improve the Lorenzo Carter wiki page . It says I need to use inline citations but I used parenthetical which in other parts of Wikipedia is considered ok. How can I get the problem flags off of this article on the founder of Cleveland's first permanent settlement? you can email me at wooodlandinator@hotmail.com. Thank you in advance.— Precedingunsigned comment added byWoodlandinator (talk •contribs)15:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm an OTRS volunteer, and am writing to you because you have made significant recent contributions toStadium Mustard. I have reproduced onTalk:Stadium Mustard (with permission) an email sent to OTRS from the president of the company, requesting that clarifications and corrections made to the article. I have also received a suggested revision for the article, reproduced in my sandbox atUser:Amatulic/sandbox, which probably isn't appropriate for replacement, but material from that could be incorporated.
In addition, I have received copies (graphic scans) of sources from some notable publications, which I can't upload to Wikipedia, but could forward to you by email if you're willing to help out updating this article. ~Amatulić(talk)23:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Computer languages have never been a strong suit for me... let's see if this signature works right....Ryecatcher773User talk:Ryecatcher773
Thanks for uploadingFile:New Dallas Stars.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Werieth (talk)01:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toCuisine of Quebec may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
Thanks,BracketBot (talk)16:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've been swamped the last few days. I guess I'm okay with a Lanigan piped wlink until I get the article together. I just don't want this to become a regular thing. /16:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
EvergreenFir (talk)22:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. You put in the time and the work to earn it.Vjmlhds(talk)15:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
== Nomination ofCristoval Nieves for deletion ==
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleCristoval Nieves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristoval Nieves until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.ÞórrÓðinnTýrEh?22:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vjmlhds(talk)07:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryecatcher. I just noticed that 4 months ago you reverted a change I made toThe Deer Hunter. Your comment said "This is a WP article, not an OpEd piece". I was not inserting my personal opinion, the words I added were a direct quote from the article by Biskind which was cited. Before my edit, the wikipedia page just said that there was a heated debate, which seemed rather uninformative - when I read that, I wanted to know what the nature of the debate was. So I looked up the article, and inserted its wording "—was it meant ironically or not, as a critique of patriotism or a paean to it?". I'd like to reinsert the explanatory quote, please let me know if you think there is a specific problem with that, or if you think it should be done in a different way. Would it help to put quotation marks around it?Reasoned skeptic (talk)22:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedLyons Township High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSwimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 | The No Spam Barnstar |
| Thank you!Bearian (talk)18:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedNicklas Lidström, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDoug Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toBruins–Canadiens rivalry may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)02:47, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCleveland Metroparks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The main characters of the Deer Hunter are Ukrainian, not Russian. Steven's wedding takes place in a Ukrainian Orthodox Church, with a Ukrainian Orthodox priest, and traditional Ukrainian Orthodox hymns, sung in Ukrainian. The reception takes place in a Ukrainian American Citizens club with a banner stating this clearly on the wall behind the stage on the first floor. In reality this took place in the Lemko Club in Cleveland, so the Director/Set Designers took special precautions to ensure that they were Ukrainian. When the party is dancing, they dance traditional Ukrainian Dances such as the Kolomeika and Hopak. Whenever they drink in the movie, they exclaim "Nazdarovya!", the Ukrainian way of saying "Cheers!". When Steven is pulled out of the bar, the woman (presumably his mother) calls him a "Drurak!" which means fool or idiot in Ukrainian. Ukrainians have been fighting to stop their seemingly never ending confusion with Russians for centuries, and this article is one of thousands of examples of this happening. I simply seek recognition for what is right and true, this is an encyclopedia after all, shouldn't it contain the correct information?BytorsSnowdog (talk)12:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toSteve Janaszak may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)23:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited1996 World Cup of Hockey rosters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAbington, Pennsylvania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
02:40, 20 July 2011 Ryecatcher773 (talk | contribs) m . . (1,514 bytes) (0) . . (moved West Park, Cleveland to Kamm's Corners: The Cleveland City Planning Commission lists West Park as part of the Kamm's Corners Statistical Planning Area. West Park will serve as a subsection for that page.) (undo | thank)
Hello,
I'm a Trustee for the West Park Historical Society and as our society grows (founded in 2005) and our research widens, we'd like to make West Park Cleveland a separate page as a historical piece on the West Park area. We can still keep a link to your Kamm's Corners article because as you correctly state it's part of the Kamm's SPA today.
Do you foresee any conflicts with this?
Thanks,
Juphilli (talk)23:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ryecatcher773, are you aware that links can be piped, i.e. they can display something other than what they link to? If you click though the "Cleveland, Ohio" links onmy last edit orthe earlier one, you can clearly see they link toCleveland with no redirect.Jweiss11 (talk)04:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Dayton' redirects to 'Dayton, Ohio'... so I'd enter it as: [[Dayton, Ohio|Dayton]], [[Ohio]]. They are still two separate entities (albeit one is subordinate) with free-standing articles.Ryecatcher773 (talk)05:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's a related discussion atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football#Linking_to_cities_whose_state_is_omitted_from_their_article_title that you are invited to join to help form a consensus. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk)20:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for correcting my editing error toShane Doan and not just reverting. appreciate it.Primergrey (talk)07:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a little something for you to do with as you will to celebrate the Bucks' double national championships this year.
Vjmlhds(talk)03:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)~[reply]
Awarded to Ryecatcher773 for consistent and yeoman's work on Ohio based articlesVjmlhds(talk)23:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
23:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Do you take photographs for Wikipedia in the Chicago area?WhisperToMe (talk)17:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for providing the source. It's a good thing Wikipedia has strict rules about biographies of living persons and specifically about religious identification (seeWP:BLPCAT and particularly read the criteria for inclusion in a category). That's whyWilliam J. Murray, who became famous for being an atheist, cannot now be identified as an atheist on Wikipedia. Take a good look atCategory:American Roman Catholics, or any religious category for that matter. At any given time about 10-30% of people in the category are not sourced as currently identifying as RC. It was close to 50% before a few editors started pruning it. Some were placed in the category simply because they had Italian or Hispanic last names.Sundayclose (talk)18:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sundayclose (talk)18:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
achievements
Thank you, proud dad, for quality articles such asCentral, Cleveland andOff Color Brewing, for startingproject Cleveland, forgnomish corrections and page moves, creating userboxes and navboxes, forproviding thoughtful comments andprecision, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!
Five years ago, you were recipient no.1239 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk)03:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
Ryecatcher773,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. /04:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, Ryecatcher773. Thanks for your recent contributions to theHalf Acre Beer Company article. As to whether or not the Balmoral Avenue brewery has started actual production, I did go to the brewery website. It says that the Balmoral brewery was built in 2015, and that "Half Acre is able to grow relative to its own creative ambition," and so on. I was looking for something a little more explicit, either there or on their Facebook page -- something along the lines of, "We're excited to say that our first batch is finished and will be hitting stores next week." But, you seem pretty confident that the new place is up and running. So, how do you know that? I'm asking this informally, not demanding that you produce a reference fromChicago magazine or anything.—Mudwater (Talk)02:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Did youmean to delete "United Kingdom" from filming location when removing the bowdlerization of "fuck"?Cleopatran Apocalypse (talk)00:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Appalachian population in Collinwood may have diminished, but the article states that they were a historically significant presence along with Slovenes and Italians but that the neighborhood is now majority African-American. Wouldn't it be fair to include culture/history categories for African-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Slovene-Americans, as well as Appalachian migrants?Bohemian Baltimore (talk)08:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectHockey on the ice. Please participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . Right now this links to bandy, which is quite ridiculous if you ask me. Hockey on ice is ice hockey, and the redirect should justifiably go to that page.Sportsfan 1234 (talk)00:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ryecatcher773. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isNoticeboard#Cleveland_issues_with_nicknames_in_the_introduction.The discussion is about the topicCleveland. Thank you. --Nobody1231234 (talk)05:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! You are invited to attend theGreat Buckeye Wiknic inColumbus, Ohio onSunday, July 10th from1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up atFred Beekman Park, a park onOhio State University's campus.
If you're interested, please take a lookat our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!
If you have any questions, feel free to leave oneon my talk page. Thanks!~SuperHamsterTalkContribs05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username fromthis list.)
There is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent OWN behavior despite multiple editors' warnings regarding an issue in which you participated in talk-page discussion. --Tenebrae (talk)20:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.TimothyJosephWood17:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Thanks for your work on the5 Rabbit Cervecería article, and your comment on theAfD. Aboutthis, the connection is thatThe Wieners Circle also had a Trump-related food product. It's mentioned in their article. Whether or not that merits a "see also" is another question.—Mudwater (Talk)01:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Absolutely yes. If we can leave off information from the intro because it's in the infobox, why bother providing the county or the state? Why bother mentioning the population? The intro is supposed to be a summary of the rest of the article; in an article about a physical location, what could be a more basic detail than the country in which it's located? Occasional articles use a different format, as you note, but "X County, State, United States" is the format that's almost always used, and there's normally no good reason to deviate from it.Nyttend (talk)03:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
...but nothing came through. Didn't want you to think I was ignoring it. --Tenebrae (talk)21:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 | You are invited to participate in the20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to theUnited States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See morehere! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ryecatcher773. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you reverted a series of IP edits at OSU - it's the sock of a blocked user from way back, worth keeping an eye on (about 85% of what he does is fine but 15% is weird and suspect) - a bit more backgroundhere andhere.JohnInDC (talk)14:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryecatcher! I'm writing because I see that you're an active member of WikiProject Politics. I'm looking for editors who might be interested in helping me update the article for theCongressional Institute—a group that organizes the annual retreat for Republican members of Congress and sponsors the Congressional Art Competition, among other things. I have drafted an updated and expanded article on behalf of the Institute as part of my work with Beutler Ink. Thatdraft is here, but there is more explanation about it in myTalk page note here. Due to my COI I won't edit the article directly, so I'm looking for neutral editors to review this draft. Thanks for your time!Heatherer (talk)14:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryecatcher773 ,
I understand that the trade has been confirmed by most major news outlets. However, it is Wikipedia policy to wait for official reports from the teams involved. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject_Sports/Handling_sports_transactions. There have been cases where trades were confirmed, but were later invalidated, or were due to false reporting.Natg 19 (talk)00:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedBeachwood, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNew York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ryecatcher773. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A major reason for my commenting atTalk:Cleveland was to see if I could get a response from someone in the Cleveland area, so thank you :-) I see thatCommons:Special:Contributions/Ryecatcher773 is almost empty, but if you have a camera and some time to drive, could you try to help with a project of mine? For the last three years, I've been working on illustrating all municipalities and townships in Ohio, and it's now 98% done (just 42 places remain out of 2,352 places), but as I don't live in Ohio anymore, it's rather hard to work on it now. My project page isUser:Nyttend/Ohio; from there you can see that all of the counties with any un-illustrated locations either border Cuyahoga County or border the bordering counties. If you could contribute, it would be quite helpful.Nyttend (talk)00:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Pipeworks Brewing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you hadn't followed the procedure while nominatingNicholas Calio for deletion, which I have rectified. Please seeWP:AFDHOW to understand the process. Thanks,MT TrainTalk09:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atBeachwood, Ohio shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Anachronist(talk)08:04, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:KingsAlternateLogo 95-96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated,bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Appreciate people who take the time to help with the onboarding process. Cheers, Mark Halsey Mark Halsey 20:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Ryecatcher773. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Miracle1980 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Sabbatino (talk)22:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Seattle Metropolitans Crest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=logo} | US Banknote Contest |  |
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties ofUnited States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented onWikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,Colonial America, theConfederate States, theRepublic of Texas, multiplestates and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December,WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators onall Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receiveawards. Whether you want to claim theGold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited toparticipate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructionshere | ||
Sent byZLEA at23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploadingFile:PlatformBeerCo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)02:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have removed the{{proposed deletion/dated}} tag fromDan Whalen, which you proposed for deletion. The subject clearly passesWP:NGRIDIRON, having played professionally in the Arena Football League.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add{{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it atWikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!Eagles 24/7 (C)20:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't remove students who attended but did not graduate. For Wikipedia purposes we consider anyone who attended, even for one day, to be an alumnus.Meters (talk)07:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTennessee whiskey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTitle track. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)05:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you likeThe West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it underWikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your namehere—hope to see you there!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRapini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCuisine of Rome.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:CCPL.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ten years ago,you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk)05:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Stadium Mustard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
![[6]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aCleveland%2527s_Little_Italy.jpg){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
