User talk:Rutdam
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. With regards to your edits to2024 Georgian parliamentary election, if an edit you make is reverted, rather than reinstate your edit, you are expected (in accordance withWP:BRD) to seek consensus for the change on the article talk page (in this caseTalk:2024 Georgian parliamentary election). Cheers,Number5714:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Rutdam. There is currently a discussion going on 2024 Georgian parliamentary election about the type of infobox that should be used (TIE vs TILE). Chime in.Zlad! (talk)21:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedUnity (Georgia), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesNeutralism andGori. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)19:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Quinlan (talk)01:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]I invite you to join in the discussion I have started onTalk:Shalva Papuashvili, in regards to doubts as to his legitimacy.
Please take a look and contribute with your opinions (and reasons), thanksEmily.Owl ( she/her •talk)14:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize. I thought the Black Sea was landlocked, but I recently read it isn't.Dr. Precursor (talk)03:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits toRussia under Vladimir Putin when you modified the page, you introducedunknown parameters. Just because you specify|some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The|some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is aShow preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact thehelp desk for assistance.Thank you.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)21:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related tothe Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.