Joe I03:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, here's a few tips for editing. With headings (and article titles, and words in general), we don't normally use capitals unless there is some special reason to. We also only useboldface for the article's subject (though there are exceptions).Richard001 (talk)10:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder, regardingmutualism, that we don't use capitals in section headings unless needed.Richard001 (talk)05:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you knew this, but it isn't necessary to write about yourself in the 3rd person on your userpage. Unless you like it that way! Anyhow, I replied to yourquery about video game userboxen.xenocidic (talk)04:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rustyfence. You havenew messages atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Userboxes#Video Game Userboxes?.
You mayremove this notice at any time by removing the{{newmessages}} template.

~RayLast^«Talk!»13:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you done with your revisions? Your last edit was seven days ago so I'm going to pull the revamp tag off unless you're still using it. Lemme know, thank you. --AeronPrometheus (talk)18:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix your Xbox Live userbox, But your gamertag seems to be entered wrong. If you want to let me know the proper typing of it, I can try again.xenocidic (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)That's very odd. I could've sworn that's exactly my Xbox gamertag... I'll check back about that...Rustyfence (talk)17:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reversed your changes to the section headers because they imply that the first disclosures were in 2013. The article tells about other disclosures that began in 1972. Thanks for bringing up the scope of the article for discussion; I've replied to your proposal. —rybec11:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rustyfence. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The articleVirus Locker has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software stub (WP:NSOFT).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.DrStrausstalk15:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rustyfence. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onGovernment Blockchain Association, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of thecriteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (Seesection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (Seesection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.PlotHelpful (talk)07:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, your article wasn't deleted, it got moved toDraft:Government Blockchain Association. Thanks for your edit summary on its creation -"NOTE: I am associated with the government blockchain association". The following notices are relevant to your situation, the first links to the proper form for disclosing yourconflict of interest and the second outlines additional house-rules concerning blockchain articles :-

Hello, Rustyfence. Wewelcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or thingsyou have written about on Wikipedia, you may have aconflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See theconflict of interest guideline andFAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the{{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (seeWP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (seeWP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia'scontent policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (seeWP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Acommunity decision has authorised the use ofgeneral sanctions for pages related to theblockchain andcryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are describedhere. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to aonerevert per twenty-four hoursrestriction, as describedhere.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behaviour, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is loggedhere. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Happy editing,Cabayi (talk)12:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rustyfence. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Government Blockchain Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.CptViraj (📧)08:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:Stormtrooper Effect.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, user-created with no apparent encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.mattbr10:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]