Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

This page is archived byClueBot III.

Hi again! I think you should say, like, "Use last name unless the article is known by names-and-patronymics instead of surnames."⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆13:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Clariniie: Which edits of mine and which Wikipedia policy or guideline are you referring to?Robby.is.on (talk)16:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to one of your edit summaries on František Šmahel and Nicolae Oaidă articles for example.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆12:25, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'm afraid I don't understand the issue. In both cases, my edit summaries indicated that I made the changes so that the articles would use the subject's last name – as required perMOS:SURNAME. Neither Šmahel nor Oaidă has patronymics.Robby.is.on (talk)13:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The whole infobox on this cricketer is sourced to a specific entry on CricketArchive, where there is a "full name" as part of the entry. All cricket infoboxes should have a direct reference to either CricketArchive.com or espncricinfo.com, which carry similar information. Unless you're going to dispute every single article on individual cricketers, I suggest you revert.Johnlp (talk)17:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation,@Johnlp:. I have self-reverted.Robby.is.on (talk)19:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Johnlp (talk)11:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since we had a little discussion about whether to state the nationality ofThomas Strakosha as Albanian or leave it out in the short description, I was wondering about the reason you provided for leaving it out:

• You know that being born in a country doesn't always mean being a citizen of that country, right? Do you distinguish between the two?

• Also, why doesn't the rule currently apply to players likePepe,Higuaín orRakitić, as they were born in another country (and possess their citizenship as well)?

Xhulianoo (talk)13:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Xhulianoo:. Thanks for reaching out. :-)why doesn't the rule currently apply to players like Pepe, Higuaín or Rakitić I don't know but those article may have it wrong.

To be perfectly honest, I don't recall the exact reasoning for the convention I've been referring to. Others atWikipedia:WikiProject Football surely would be better able to explain it in detail. Would you mind asking the questions there? Kind regards,Robby.is.on (talk)23:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing based on his words literally said about hanukah and Chabad. Have you any source that it was reffering to Polish Jews?Kojoto (talk)21:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverting in violation ofWP:BRD. Take it to the article Talk page so other editors can participate.Robby.is.on (talk)21:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The non-notable footballer has been deleted, so I have created a dab page atFrancesco Palmieri. If you want to remove the years from the footballer then feel free.GiantSnowman19:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Thank you very much,@GiantSnowman:. I'll do that.Robby.is.on (talk)20:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This person has been banned for life from receiving any US taxpayer funding, as has his EcoHealth Alliance.Why are you defending him? It was Biden's Administration that decided that. Does that not amount to disgrace?The most effectual Bob Cat (talk)06:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The most effectual Bob Cat: Discussion about improving thePeter Daszak article should happen atTalk:Peter Daszak. If you ask there, I'll respond there. Kind regards,Robby.is.on (talk)10:44, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Renotiara

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lampyridae2000

one of thess might be sleeper account, second one lacks manners/reliability. thanks if can check.93.140.67.28 (talk)19:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of anything that I can do that you can't. If you want to report a sockpuppet, you can do that here:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations.Robby.is.on (talk)19:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a currentDispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input.ModernManifestDestiny (talk)13:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may wish to follow the discussion on my talk page.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)10:48, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kudpung. Thank you. Happy editing,Robby.is.on (talk)00:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For taking out the trash on my talk page while I was away. Highly appreciated.JeffSpaceman (talk)18:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Jeff. :-) Thanks for the barnstar. Happy editing,Robby.is.on (talk)19:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're following the AE thread would you mind leaving a comment there, would be great -FMSky (talk)00:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@FMSky:. Yes, I have been reading along out of curiosity. How would I be able to contribute?Robby.is.on (talk)01:13, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Put in a good word for me or something idk 🤣 I don't even know whats going on half the time, is this some sort of elaborate scheme to cancel me? Maybe you can comment something there as a neutralFMSky (talk)01:17, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot going on and I don't feel like I have enough insight to add anything useful. I have trust in the people involved that the request will be handled appropriately.Robby.is.on (talk)10:47, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, understandale. I barely get whats going on myself lmao. Thanks anyway --FMSky (talk)10:48, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FMSky, please do not canvass other editors to come and speak on your behalf.Liz^Read!Talk!03:21, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]