• Archive 1: Dec 06 - Apr 07
• Archive 2: Mar 07 - Aug 07

A {{prod}} template has been added to the articleBe'er Sheva North Railway Station, suggesting that it be deleted according to theproposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia'scriteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" andWikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or onits talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through theproposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of thespeedy deletion criteria or it can be sent toArticles for Deletion, where it may be deleted ifconsensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with{{db-author}}.Rambutan (talk)15:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be'er Sheva North Railway Station, an article you created, has been nominated fordeletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel thatBe'er Sheva North Railway Station satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and theWikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be'er Sheva North Railway Station and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofBe'er Sheva North Railway Station during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Rambutan (talk)15:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To the best of my knowledgeDimant is a Yiddish surname. Is this not correct? My reason for asking is that there are editors out there who keep changing the article onDJ Lethal to say that Leor Dimant's name is Latvian. (There are indeed some Latvians with the surname "Dimants", but not "Dimant".) —Zalktis15:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes: DIMANT is used as a Yiddish surname. A search atJewish Records Indexing Poland records 160 hits with this exact spelling, and about 1500 hits with minor variations on the name. --Redaktor08:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the confirmation. —Zalktis10:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is currently a discussion about the notability of RabbiShraga Hager your insight on this would greatly be appreciated[1]. Have a beautiful day--יודל13:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I noticed you had changed the birth category back on Yaakov Moelin. I would like to direct your attention to the following:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:People_by_yearwhich says that for both known and approximate dates you are supposed to use the exact year; it does not specifically mention ca. dates and I had asked about it on the talk page but received no response; so this is just my way of explaining my rationale; it seems that it should be spelled out more clearly. Let me know what you think. Thanks for your time and Shana Tova --FeanorStar723:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I cannot see your question on the talk page. To me it seems unreasonable to use the precise year category when the year of birth is unknown. --Redaktor23:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redaktor. I am curious as to why you deleted the section onNew Square, New York concerning the use of the Yiddish language within this community. Why was this removed? Thanks and take care.

• "The predominant language spoken in New Square isYiddish."New Square community profileCulturalrevival22:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your comment. Far from deleting it, I wrote it! --Redaktor22:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I apologise, that was my mistake, I read the edits in reverse. I apologise for the misunderstanding, thank you for this contribution to the article. I appreciate it, thanks.Culturalrevival22:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your informative edit toBeit Shemesh Railway Station. --Redaktor18:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• You're welcome. I had been to the station, and I was surprised to see no mention of the details in theBeit Shemesh article. It's amazing what you find in trying to source unsourced claims in articles: many are untrue or unverifiable, but when you can find a good source, it makes it all the more worthwhile to me as an editor, and can make Wikipedia more useful to those who read the articles.Alansohn19:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there was some damage done to theSlonim article, can you take a look at it ?yisraeldov14:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you edited the Wikipedia article on the Israeli Settlement of Gilo. While you almost completely censored all references to it as a settlement, it came to my attention in particular that you minimised the viewpoint of--Redaktor 11:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC) it being such as to that held only by Yasser Arafat. Not only did you not even read the references cited, including the United Nations, you are completely unqualified to make edits on this topic, if you truly think Yasser Arafat is the only one who holds the view that Gilo is an Israeli Settlement and Illegal under International Law. The United Nations and The European Union both recognise its illegality, as do a long line of Lawyers who specialize in International Law. When the only party who denies its illegality is the belligerent occupier them self, don't you think that might be called bias? Your edit was filled with a number of other factual errors, and i noticed that you changed the pages layout, so that the mostly irrelevant, tourist sort of information was put ahead of the settlements legal status and the territorial acquisitions. Care to explain?Colourinthemeaning22:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1 I do not censor anything. Repeating the word settelement more than ten times is totally unnecessary, other than to make a point. 2 The reference which allegedly refers to the inernational community is actually a statement by Yasser Arafat. 3 The United Nations and the European Commmunity do not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any part of Jerusalem. 4 Indisputable factual information belongs ahead of politically disputed issues. 5 The expression "belligerent occupier" is a POV. 6 The only belligerents in Gilo are the Arab snipers. --Redaktor23:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the word settlement may be overused, but it only appears in the article 6 times, not 10. It was used to replace the word 'neighbourhood,' which itself is a point of view -- and more so one, because it is a view held by a small number of people, compared to the International Community. While most of the use of the word 'settlement' is used in discussing the dispute over this word, I will do my best to rework the article so that it does not use the word so much. I wonder what you would prefer I call it, though? The reference quotes not just Yasser Arafat but UN Documents, Resolutions and other NGO documents. Do you really believe that information on how to get to a place, and what you might find around there, belongs ahead of what it is on Wikipedia? The term "belligerent occupier" is not any more a POV than the view that Coke is a soft drink, it refers to the party who is on land that they do not have sovereignty to, and yet refuse to leave. Your final point, that the 'only belligerents in Gilo are the arab snipers' truly highlights that you do not understand the nuances of the word. You can't defend yourself on somebody else's land, legally, nor can you be a belligerent against those occupying your land, however deplorable the means. Notice, i use the word 'occupying,' not as a point of view, but as a fact -- what makes Israel an occupier is simply the FACT that they are on somebody else's land, which they have no sovereignty over, against the will of those there (not counting those that have been 'put' there). Lastly, I'd like to ask what you believe Gilo is? The Har Gilo Settlement is a settlement, is it not? Located very close to Gilo, both are East of the Armistice Line, so what differentiates them?Colourinthemeaning10:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing POV about the word neighbourhood—it is completely neutral—whereas settlement is used in a pejorative sense. The location information is not 'How to get there'. 'What you might find there' or 'tourist information'. It is a purely geographic decsription and, without doubt, belongs before a political discussion. Yes, you may say that Israel has no sovereignty over Gilo, but then, nor does anyone else. And what do you mean by 'against the will of those there'? --Redaktor11:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term neighborhood is a subjective word, simply because of its connotations, and in this case, because it is predominantly only 'those that live there,' so to speak, that view it as such. Internationally however, Gilo is recognized as a Settlement, because thats what it is. Essentially, every definition, explanation or name will be laden with POV's, it really just comes down to whether that point of view is held by everyone. Despite our disagreements, however, looking over the Gilo article now, I am pleased to say that I think it constitutes a factual, even-sided and unbiased explanation. I only had a problem with the topographic information where it was before, because it was two paragraphs above the first line that explained what Gilo in fact was. We've got that sorted now though, so thank you. By my comment, 'against the will of those there,' i meant that Israel's presence within the West Bank and East of the Armistice line, is not what a large majority of people who live, and lived there, want or wanted. I was not referring to the settlers or other Israeli's who have relocated to the West Bank after the 67 war, so apologies if that is where you misunderstood me.Colourinthemeaning17:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor: I came across theTemplate:Hasidic dynasties you created and wanted to give you a heartyyasher koach. Wow! What a job!Tizku lemitzvos! I rarely hand out barnstars or Wikipedia awards, but my heart tells me that I must do so now. I hereby award you{{The da Vinci Barnstar}} for all your amazing technical and editorial work. The award appears on your user page. Thank you!IZAK08:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i would like to second the above compliments on u i even copied it in whole for other wikipedia languages, it is astronomical work that shoes how one person can change the face of this medium, since many Hasidic Rabbis biographies are being saved from speedy deletions - since they will see the name apearing on this template, who knows how many labor went down the drain all those years when the sysops did not bother to check by speedy deleting names they did not know. may hashem repay your hard work with many more Zechusim here to come for us in the wikipedia. but all this should not take u away from the yiddish project, u r needed more there than here, since the english has milllions of users we have only u, thanks.--יודל11:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yiddisheryid: I think we can bemelamed zechus on the sysops in this instance and I think no articles about Hasidic dynasties have been lost or deleted (except maybe through internal discussions between the Judaic editors working on these articles) and I cannot recall any articles about Rebbes or notable Hasidim that have been deleted. If you notice any such moves please notify me. So you can take a deep breath and relax on this worry. Thanks for noticing and appreciating UserRedaktor (talk ·contribs)'s good work! Hemust be from theTzadikim Nistarim.IZAK09:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Izak nobody can relax we have here a jewish editor who cls himsef a Rabbi and u know him better than me that he speedy deletes and votes to delete all hareidy rabbis, and if not User Redaktor we would not saved the kosever rebbe shrage hager article, redakter isnt a zadik nister he is just somebody who cares deeply about chasidic history and our hasidic life and he has bothered to be voice full and open about it and not be intimidated by bullies who call themselves rabbis and use sysop tools against other users who don't have that tools. thanks for caring--יודל13:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for all those kind words (and the barnstar!!) It is always nice to be appreciated.--Redaktor12:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me out with typing Yiddish on the computer? There's aHebrew transliterator on the Internet, but it doesn't work well with Yiddish. How do you type out that cool language? --nlitement^[talk]14:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you meant "א גוטן טאג". The best way to type Yiddish is to use your keyboard with a Yiddish (or Hebrew) font. For a simple interface go toYiddish Typewriter. --Redaktor (talk)14:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

דאַנק פֿור די הילף Is it normal for the webpage to use niqqud? "Gutn tag" gives me "גוטן תּג". Also, why do you write it as א גוטן טאג and not גוטן טאַג? What does the alef at the beginning do and why doesn't the a in "tag" not have a diacritic below it? --nlitement^[talk]16:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some styles useאַ and אָ . tag is not Yiddish; the word is טאָג tog. In Yiddish one says א גוטן טאג; the א is the indefinite article. Many (most?) Yiddish writers omit the diacritics. HTH.

PS: Yiddish uses פֿאר for German für. I would have said: א דאנק פאר דער הילף --Redaktor (talk)16:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh.. I see.. so one would basically say "a good day" and not "good day" like in German? So eyn is not the article, but only a number? Well, this should get me into a.. not too bad start with Yiddish! --nlitement^[talk]17:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, איין is an adjectival form for one. --Redaktor (talk)17:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to bother you too much by changing the topic, but do you happen to know if it was common for secular (?) Jews to marry non-Jews in 20th century Belarus? Just wondering.. because my Jewish ancestor(s), of maternal lineage, didn't have Hebrew or Biblical names. I've tried searching for Shinder on Jewishgen.org's Belarus database, and most people with that name are from Grodno gubernia which is where my Shinder greatgrandmother comes from but I don't see any familiar names there. How secure would you consider my "Jewry"? Jews were a great majority in Belarus (including Brest city) during that time anyway, but is that enough? --nlitement^[talk]19:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a very dificult question to answer. What are the names of your maternal ancestors? --Redaktor (talk)22:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, apologies for the slightly bad wording.. the only people in my family tree as far as traced with a Yiddish surname are Aleksandr and Nadia Shinder (Aleksandr's daughter). Unfortunately no one can recall my greatgreatgrandmother's name. Also, they lived there until '44 (surprisingly missed by the Nazis, which I definitely reckon is because they did not practice Judaism), and were later sent to Kazakhstan. I'm just wondering how far you'd have to trace your ancestry in order to be recognized as Jewish. --nlitement^[talk]23:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you have to trace your identity back to someone recognizably Jewish. There must be some record (eg Nadia's birth certificate) which identifies her mother. --Redaktor (talk)08:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot get that to work, not sure if its a unicode error or a RtL issue. Sorryβ^_command16:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Shirahadasha (talk)21:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the town in your articleRadoszyce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship the same place asRadoszyce, Subcarpathian Voivodeship? If so then there are two articles on the same town. If different places no problem. Cheers,Sting_auTalk11:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No—different voivodeships! --Redaktor11:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor: As one of Wikipedia's Yiddish experts you may be interested that I recently created a{{Yiddish-stub}} but it has now been nominated for deletion, seeWikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/December/20. What do you think? Sincerely,IZAK (talk)00:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to Bikinibomb's comments about figs and Judaismhere, thanksSlrubenstein |Talk01:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a pretty pointless discussion to me. --Redaktor (talk)21:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you fit the photo in somewhere? It was my favourite bit!Chesdovi (talk)00:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing it out—I didn't notice that it had gone! --Redaktor (talk)00:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you use wikipedia much more than wikibooks, but I left a comment for you in your talk page in wikibooks. Basically, I wanted to refer you to what I wrote atWikibooks:Talk:Yiddish_for_Yeshivah_Bachurim/Reading_Yiddish. BTW, I find it very hard to believe that you are Chareidi, speak English and Yiddish, and don't speak Yeshivish.Clum (talk)08:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which bit strains your credulity? --Redaktor (talk)11:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have lots of friends who a) are Chareidi, b) speak English, and c) speak Yiddish, and all of them are extremely proficient in Yeshivish. BTW, you are correct that most of the Yiddish I know is from my Rebbe, who most certainly doesn't speak it natively (he's Israeli). I have friends who speak Yiddish natively, but they speak to me in English. I do sometimes overhear conversations in Yiddish, though. It took me a while to figure out what your username means. --Clum (talk)13:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor: I am reposting the following request from UserSh76us (talk ·contribs) on my user talk page for wider notification:

I was thinking of trying to stimulate development of a series of articles onGemara concepts and doctrines, maybe to help children or newcomers to Gemara with explanations of some fundamental concepts that recur throughout the Gemara. Some examples might be articles on Yiush, Chazakah, Ta'aninun (as in "Ta'aninun L'Yoresh"), Eidim Zomemin (forgive my awful transliterations), Migu, etc., etc. Maybe we could even create a category or subcategory for it. I createdBreira in this vein. As I don't have the experience or expertise in Wikipedia to know what to do to best develop this idea, I figured I'd come to you for your opinions on: (1) whether it's a good idea; and (2) How to best go about implementing it. ThanksSh76us (talk)15:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized discussion at:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Idea for Talmud articles. Thank you.IZAK (talk)03:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you cleaned up Chernobyl (Hasidic dynasty) and it seems you removed the link I created toHornstipel. The first link in the article currently links to a non-existent page on the Hornostipel dynasty. should we emend that link to point to the hometown instead? Kol TovRabbi-m (talk)17:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have started theHornsteipl (Hasidic dynasty) article. --Redaktor (talk)19:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It helps to add at least one reference at the time you make the article -- e.g.Aaron Twerski of Chernobyl. I recognize him as notable but not everyone will unless there is some source listed.DGG (talk)22:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder! Now remedied.--Redaktor (talk)12:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you created and edited the Rabbi Chanokh Heynekh HaKohen Levin article. Can you provide the source for name of his wife "Chana Hentshe Feyge Pachter"? Sources that I have seen (Bromberg in Ha'Admor R' Chanoch Henoch Hacohen Levine Me'Aleksander, and Chashovoh leToivo) show the name as Chana Faige with no surname, the daughter of Yaakov Yoikel of Przysucha. In her 1864 Przasnysz death registration her name is listed as "Chana Basia", the wife of Chanoch Henoch Lewin (no parents name listed). The name Chaia Basia is listed more than once in the document, making it unlikely to be a typo, but it could be a clerk error.—Precedingunsigned comment added byKosherJava (talk •contribs)21:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hentshe from Hamodia, issue 250. צדיקי עולם identifies his father-in-law as Tsvi Hersh Pachter of Prshishkhe. However, Pachter means 'lessee' so maybe it wasn't a surname. --Redaktor (talk)00:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the translation of the death registration, it is apperant that he had 3 wives. The one who died in 1864 (as mentioned in the yizkor book and Bromberg's book) is based on the death record that I have a copy of. An extract of the data shows the following: 1864 death #9, registration date: Feb 28,1864, location: Przasnysz, event date: Feb 27,1864, Surname LEWI[N], Given Name: Chana Basia, Maiden Name: RABINOWICZ, Age 46, Father: Uszer, Mother: Laja, Husband: Henoch LEWIN,Rabin (Rabbi) and daugther Elka Hudes WALBERG. This wife is not his first, being the approx same age as his children. I am curious if you have seen this mentioned anywhere. This should probably be copied to the talk page.KosherJava (talk)02:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two wives (no need for a third)I shall edit the box accordingly. I reckon the daughter Elka Hudes was hers but not his. Thanks for the details. By all means add whatever is relevant to the Talk page. --Redaktor (talk)13:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated two categories you created,Category:Orthodox Jewish communities in England andCategory:Orthodox Jewish communities in London, for deletion. Discussion ishere. --Eliyak T·C05:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor!

I have reverted most of your edits to the page. Here is why:

1. Mapik - there was clear consensus to ignore themapik because it's ignored in the pronunciation by all Hebrew-speakers worldwide. Morevoer, it's extremely difficult to find out what words have amapik - most Hebrew dictionaries, even those withnikud, do not includemapiks. I think only the biggest ones like Even Shoshan and Sapir have them.
2. Acronyms - not exactly true. A two-letter acronym is still an acronym, so you can't say 'abbreviations which are not acronyms'. For example, MP in Hebrew is מ"צ (Mem-Tzadik), which is an acronym but isn't treated as a regular word like Hafshan, Kistu'ah, etc.
3. Mishna vs. Mishnah - not sure what you mean because you didn't make a related edit, but it doesn't really matter, we can just provide another example.

--Ynhockey^(Talk)13:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Almost everyone who commented about mapik he said that itshould be rendered as h.
2. The generally accepted meaning of an acronym is an abbreviation which is read as a word; so my edits stand. מ"צ is an abbreviation but not an acronym

--Redaktor (talk)15:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not replying earlier, I didn't see that you replied. If you can, please reply on my talk page next time so that I will notice it immediately. Now about your points:

1. There was no real central discussion on the issue, and only a few editors commented - although there seemed to be an agreement that amapik would be too complicated to transliterate. Doron stated that the Hebrew Academy dictated that it should be transliterated, and that ahe withmapik is a consonant, unlike one without amapik, although he never said that it would be a good idea to transliteratemapik on Wikipedia. He doesn't really imply either way. Another editor, Rafi Neal, seems to believe thathe at the end of words should be transliterated either way, with or withoutmapik, and agrees that transliterating themapik is complicated and probably won't be needed much anyway. A third user, Tomer, advocates using "hh" formapik (carried away?), although he clearly advocates a very strict phonetical transliteration (e.g. q forkuf, etc.) and therefore taking his argument on themapik and pairing it with the current guideline is taking his version completely out of context. It is likely that Tomer would offer a different opinion if he was told that a simple and not direct transliteration was required.

2. Not sure by whom it's 'generally accepted', but let's not confuse users by using obscure non-dictionary definitions. An acronym is defined very clearly in English dictionaries, and by definition,Mem-Tzadik (and similar) is an acronym. I assume your edit on this issue was to clarify, therefore even if you're technically correct, we should use a much clearer version for the unenlightened user. The wording should be as simple and unambiguous as possible.

I absolutely don't mind starting a centralized discussion about themapik, although seeing as how the guideline has morphed from being a strict transliteration table to a much looser one, I don't think it is appropriate to transliterate amapik while ignoringdagesh and other more common symbols.

Hope to hear from you,Ynhockey^(Talk)21:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you started this, but was there ever a dynasty?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣22:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there was a flourishing dynasty until World War II. There is a surviving Kostsker Rebbe living in Israel. I shall try to add a bit to the article. --Redaktor (talk)07:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where on earth did the spelling Borenstein come from? His name was Avrohom Bornsztajn. --Redaktor (talk)23:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor, I see that you are a "buki" in Hebrew (and Polish) pronunciation and spelling. I don't agree, however, that we should use such obscure spellings as "Bornsztajn" when most Jewish publications use the simpler and easier (for English speakers) to read, "Borenstein" (YU Torah Online,Jewish Press,JewishLaw.com,Feldheim Publishers,JewishGen.org). I also question your spelling of "Avrohom" vs. "Avraham" and "Chidushei HoRim" vs. "HaRim," which is how I've always seen it spelled and which is how it (Avraham) is spelled on many other Wikipedia pages. Could you direct me to a Wikipedia policy page or consensus discussion which backs up your spelling choices? Thanks,Yoninah (talk)20:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. If you spell it Borenstein you guarantee that it will not be pronounced correctly (BornShtine).
2. It is generally accepted that articles about Chasidic leaders and courts should use Ashkenazi transcription. (seeWP:HE#Ashkenazi)

--Redaktor (talk)21:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I added references to his Polish birth record and his parent's marriage record that use the spelling BorensztainKosherJava (talk)22:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, KosherJava; much appreciated. --Redaktor (talk)08:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the information; I do appreciate the links. NowKosherJava has introduced yet another spelling. I prefer Borensztain to Borensztajn. Is that acceptable to you?Yoninah (talk)08:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. --Redaktor (talk)09:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Redaktor, I just noticed you changed the spelling of "Avnei Nezer" to "Avnei Neizer". Honestly, I've never seen it spelled that way. If you Google the latter, you get a question: "Did you mean AvneiNezer?"Yoninah (talk)11:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed itback to Avnei Neizer

I don't know what generates Google prompts—Google reports more than 2000 hits for Avnei Neizer, which is the way everyone I know says it. I have never heard anyone actually say Avnei Nezer. --Redaktor (talk)11:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redaktor, I thought I might ask your opinion. What do you think of the idea I have to put on my user page an offer to do "commissions" or "write articles on request" (for free of course) i.e. offer to research and write up any articles of a certain limited nature (=just Orthodox Rabbonim, have to be deceased already, looking especially for Rabbonim of the 'old school' who were Gedolei Torah and knew shas ba'al peh). I'd ask people to give me names of Rabbonim they would like an article on and I'd try, subject to compatability with the type of article and type of Rov I like writing on, to write a wiki bio of the said Rov. What do you think? {ps I'm also asking User:Izak)Lostvelt (talk)13:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent idea!! --Redaktor (talk)16:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rabbi or Mr. Redaktor. I am relativelly new in the Wikipedia, but I see that theZionists made themselves very comfortable here, and are attacking everyone that believes different then them. I have created theYishuv haYashan article, which is something important historically speaking. I see they are trying to remove any information about theHaredim who didn't participate in theZionist movement. Furthermore the whole history of the Yishuv haYashanKollelim was ignored but instead an article aboutHalukka in a negative spotlight. They are trying to persuade that all those who did for our brothers inEretz Yisroel wereZionists. I would suggest that we incorporate in a WikiProject:Yishuv haYashan or WikiProject:Torah Judaism in order to clarify the facts.

HagiMalachi (talk)16:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you object to in the article? Setting up a new WikiProject won't solve anything, will it? --Redaktor (talk)17:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been setting up a website myself, somewhat modeled after Wikipedia. It's intended as a mix of encyclopedia and news site. See:http://meahshearim.googlepages.com . You're invited to leave your opinion via my email or talk page. Keep in mind that it's just under construction (this is basically the work of about 5 days, a few hours each day). --Piz d'Es-Cha (talk)13:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. --Redaktor (talk)14:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Judaism Newsletter Issue I --Sivan,5768

Main Project PageTalk PageJudaism PortalCategoriesTo Do JudaismAFD/RFC What's This? Shalom aleichem sports fans, and welcome to the first of what I hope will be a monthly newsletter with the need-to-know information about our fair WikiProject. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to recommend a story for the newsletter, clickhere to leave a message on the Newsletter Coordinator's talk page. In the News WikiProject Good Articles is doing sweeps over all our current good articles to ensure they still meet criteria. For more information and how you can help, check outWikiProject Good Articles Sweeps. GA status for the articleJew has been put on hold pending a few minor revisions. A list of things that need to be done to return this top importance article to its proper status can be foundhere. Jerusalem is a Featured Article Candidate! Go forth, my people, and!vote! To Do One new Judaism-related article was created this month, the long requestedHebrew Punctuation. Thanks toEpson291 for creating it. Remember, folks, there are over fortystanding requests for Judaism articles, so whenever you get the opportunity make sure to go create a few. In the right column you will see a listing of our most popular articles. All of these articles got 170,000+ page hits in the past month, and they should be on everyone's watchlist so we can keep them vandalism-free. Spread the word! No, not theWord...(well, you can do that too) I'm talking about inviting knowledgeable users to join the project. You can proclaim your undying love of WikiProject Judaism in methods mild to wild, check theproject template page andmember list for examples. We also now have a flashy advertisement, to use it add {{Wikipedia ads|ad=148}} to your userpage. Quick Stats On the date of publish, we had... 275Project Members 6152 articles 2341 of which areStubs 15 of which areGood 8 of which areFeatured New Members Benignuman Bernstein2291 Shevashalosh Yudel Most Popular Articles By page hits.Source. Israel The Holocaust Judaism Ten Commandments Ark of the Covenant Wikipedia ads file info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered byShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name fromthis list.Delivered by§hepBot (Disable) on04:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Israel and France at least, the majority of Haredim are Sefaradic. And even Lithuanian speak regular Hebrew and not Ashkenazi Hebrew. So the majority rule is Khtav among Haredim.Benjil (talk)16:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I was speaking about Israel and France that I know. The majority of Haredim in the world live in Israel (all the Orthodox Jews in the USA are about the same number than the haredim alone in Israel). The majority of Haredim there, even among Ashkenazim (I live in Jerusalem, I have quite a few Haredim shuls around), pray in Israeli Hebrew. The only place I ever heard the Ashkenazi Hebrew was deep inside Bnei Brak or in some Hassidic synagogue (and not all of them, I have Habad family and they too speak Israeli Hebrew, which is logical - most of Habad are Hozrim Betshuva or their children). So the conclusion is that a great part of the haredim pray in modern Hebrew, that the one who don't still understand modern Hebrew and that some, like the Sefaradim and other Mizharim, don't use or even understand the Ashkenazi pronunciation.Benjil (talk)19:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange. I often visit Jerusalem, and in all the chareidi neighbourhoods I frequent, be it Har Nof, Romema etc, they all daven with an Ashkenazi pronunciation. And i don't believe that the majority of chareidim in Israel are Sefardic. --Redaktor (talk)19:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are no clear cut stats about the composition of the Haredi public, but I remember I read it somewhere, I need to find it. One indication is also that the haredi ashkenazi parties at the Knesset got 6 seats and Shass 12 in 2006. Yes, many Shas voters are not haredim while most (not all) voters of Yahadut Hatora are. Political commentators estimated that the core-haredi vote for Shas was 7 seats among the 12.Benjil (talk)05:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my point. More than 40% of Israeli chareidim are Ashkenazi, to which you can add more than 90% of American chareidim. --Redaktor (talk)06:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to mention, obviously there are more ashkenazi than sefardi chareidim in Israel. And Benjil: not a single Ashkenazi chareidi person uses the Sefardic (or, actually, the "Ivrit") pronunciation of Hebrew for praying. Don't ask me what kind of 'chareidim' you are mentioning, but I can tell you that they are not normal chareidim. I'd recommend you, Benjil, to go a real chareidi shul in a neighborhood such as Givat Shaul, Geulah, Ezras Torah, Romemah, the Shmuel HaNovi area, Ramot, Ramat Shlomo, Neveh Yaakov - Kaminetz, Har Nof, on Sorotzkin, Beit Yisrael, or perhaps in Bnei Brak, Beitar Illit, Kiryat Sefer, Elad, Ashdod or Kiryat Gat, and there listen to the davening. Then try again to tell me that "most Ashkenazi chareidim in Israel use the Sefardi pronunciation". --Piz d'Es-Cha (talk)11:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, if you decide that only people like you - crazy fringe anti-Zionists cult people - are "haredim", it vastly simplifies the subject. Sadly for you, reality does not work like that.Benjil (talk)16:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The people there are not "crazy fringe anti-Zionists cult people". I know the groups; I actually lived on the outskirts of Meah She'arim for a year. I went to two Chareidi Yehovot in Yerushalyim, both mixed Israeli-Chutznik, and have some familiarity with a number of Chareidi and Dati Leumi communities. (I live in Haifa.)

All male Ashkenazi native Chareidim that I know of, although they speak Ivrit, pray with an Ashkenazi accent, although often without the Yiddish (semi-mil'el) emphasis. (Interestingly, this is how I was taught in my Moderm Orthodox day school in Boro Park.) I have never seen otherwise. The women vary, I think; a young lady I work with was taught in Ivrit, except for Shem HaShem (God's name), which she was taught to pronounce Ashkenazi (Beit Ya'ackov in Haifa, with Bagrut).

Please let me know of an Ashkenazi Chareidi institution that prays in Ivrit. I would be interested in seeing it.

Finally, in discussing vote tallies, it is important to note that a certain percentage does not vote; these would mostly be Ashkenazim, I would think. Also recall that Shas has always got the Ashkenazi Chereidi-dissenter vote.--84.229.51.101 (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)84.229.51.101 (talk)12:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor, could you help out here:Talk:New_Square,_New_York#Separated_sidewalks? Thanks. --Piz d'Es-Cha (talk)11:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above page is showing up inCategory:Unassessed school articles. Can you please remove it. Thanks.FiveYears16:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads up. --Redaktor (talk)00:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter Issue II --Tammuz,5768

WikiProject Judaism (talk/to do)WikiProject Jewish History (talk/to do)WikiProject Kabbalah (talk/to do) Now with 200%more Jewishness! Yes, folks, we're moving on up. This newsletter is now the newsletter for both WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Jewish History,and WikiProject Kabbalah. In the future, I may split them, but for now I think we'll be just fine with one. As always, any questions or comments should be directed to me,L'Aquatique. A Special Dispatch Just a note, not aimed at anyone in particular. By order of the administrative cabal, it is officially not cool (and possiblydickish) to call someone an anti-semitewhen they aren't being anti-semitic. Anti-semitic is a very charged word, and it's important only to use it when you're absolutely sure it applies, lest it become the subject of aGodwin-esque law. Remember Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. In the News A new class on the importance scale has been added- C Class- which covers articles better than start but not quite to B Class yet. It is up to the WikiProjects to decide whether to adopt them or not. Currently, there has been little discussion within our Projects, so if you feel strongly either way be sure to note so at your Project[s]. There is a proposal to reword the section on NPOV regarding religious articles. Please seeWikipedia_talk:NPOV#Religion section - Disputes between historians or scientists and religious_views to weigh in. Thanks largely to the efforts ofXyz7890, a new navbox has come into being featuring Halakha topics. See:Template talk:Halakha to join in the conversation about how it can best be improved. To Do TheSimple English Wikipedia is beginning a project of creating and improving articles related to religion, including Judaism. At the present time, volunteers are needed to propose our most important subjects for articles to be created. The official working list ishere and a more extended list ishere. If you are unsure of proper topics, you might try checking our lists of top importance level articles:Judaism andJewish History. (WikiProject Kabbalah currently doesn't have such a list) [Simple English] WikiProject Christianity is considering running a monthly drive wherein two or three top importance articles from English Wikipedia are simplified and moved over to S.E. They have extended an offer to work with us in creating a similar project for Judaism related articles. For questions or volunteer opportunities, please contactUser:John Carter. WikiProject Kabbalah is in dire need of an article rating system for quality and importance. If you are familiar with that system and have some time on your hands, please create one. It could also use some infoboxes... New Members Judaism:Big maybe,Janirai,Jfdwolff,Joseph.mahal,Joshua Weiss,LisaLiel,Rcjavid,Yehudi,YY,Agent204.15,Gilad73,Joseph.mahal,Noah03 Jewish History:Noah03 Kabbalah: None. Won't youjoin? New Articles Habib ben Elisha Faturechi (ThanksPhatJew!) There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this.. Quick Links Judaism Portal Kabbalah Portal Articles for Deletion Request for Comment Article Requests WikiProject Judaism Stats 281Project Members 6155 articles 2342 of which areStubs 15 of which areGood 8 of which areFeatured WikiProject Jewish History Stats 69Project Members 1124 articles 241 of which areStubs 10 of which areGood 10 of which areFeatured WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 12Project Members 165 articles 87 of which areStubs 1 of which isGood 1 of which isFeatured Wikipedia ads file info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name fromthis list.

• Newsletter delivery byxenobot02:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter Issue III --Av,5768

WikiProject Judaism (talk/to do)WikiProject Jewish History (talk/to do)WikiProject Kabbalah (talk/to do) "Censorship" of names of G-d There is an interesting discussion currently taking place regarding whether or not it is acceptable to censor (i.e. G-d, HaShem->YodHey) names of G-d in articles to protect Jews who may be reading or editing the article. You can weigh in here:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Yahweh. Article Cleanup Lists User:B. Wolterding has generously offered us use of his bot to generate lists that show which articles of ours are tagged for cleanup. You can read more about this service here:User:B._Wolterding/Cleanup_listings and if you would like to take him up on his offer, contact him onhis talk page. In the News There is a collaboration drive to getHolocaust in Lithuania togood article status. For information about how you can help, see the talk page orcontact User:Piotrus. WikiProject Kabbalah's only Featured and Good articles have been removed from the WikiProject, on the grounds that neither article (Diane Keaton andDavid Beckham, respectively) actually mention the subject's affiliation withKabbalah. If you have sourced information linking either of these people to Kabbalah, please add it so the articles can be returned to the WikiProject. After a rather heated discussion, there are nowtwo barnstars for use by the Jewish WikiProjects,{{The Jewish Barnstar}} and{{The New Jewish Barnstar}}, and you can choose which one you would like to use.. Remember: barnstars are for rewarding users who are doing good work on the project or on Judaism, Jewish History, or Kabbalah articles, and anyone can give anyone else a barnstar. If you see a user who you thinks deserves a thank you, give them a barnstar! To Do/Help Requests If you have some spare time on your hands, we could use an article about a Kabbalah scholar namedMoshe Idel. According toHG there are quite a few sources easily available, you can contact him if you have questions. Be sure to nominate it forDYK if the finished article is eligible. The folks atShimon Peres need some assistance from someone familiar with both the Hebrew calendar and language to help them figure out the subject's birthday. If you can help, please seeTalk:Shimon_Peres#Birthday. New Members Judaism:Arigont,Avi,CheskiChips,Pini00001,Shirulashem,TaliaNadel,Tyciol,yehoshuafriedla Jewish History:5768altalena,AniMate,User:Yosef.garibaldi.gmail,Pinnecco,Shirulashem,Tyciol Kabbalah:Shuliavrumi New Articles Bezalel Rudinsky (thanksShirulashem!},Jewish tartan (thanksBriangotts!),Hebrew spelling (thanksEpson291) We get a lot of articles that are being created and not announced! By announcing new articles, you attract attention to them, and the more people looking and editing the better they will get. If you would like your new article to appear in the newsletter, add ithere for Judaism and Kabbalah andhere for Jewish History. There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this.. Quick Links Judaism Portal Kabbalah Portal Israel Portal Articles for Deletion Request for Comment Article Requests WikiProject Judaism Stats 291Project Members 6248 articles 2356 of which areStubs 18 of which areGood 6 of which areFeatured WikiProject Jewish History Stats 77Project Members 1141 articles 244 of which areStubs 10 of which areGood 10 of which areFeatured WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 13Project Members 165 articles 87 of which areStubs 0 of which are Good 0 of which are Featured Wikipedia ads file info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name fromthis list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests,barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month.L'Aquatique[approves|this|message]20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Newsletter delivery byxenobot21:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have decided to submit this article topeer review in order to qualify for Featured Article status. Would you kindly click on the above link and add your comments or suggestions? Thank you,Yoninah (talk)21:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

שׂ‎מ‎ח!‎ FromChesdovi

File:Sufganiyah.jpeg

Hi Redaktor, please add your comment to the merge discussion now underway atAvrohom Bornsztain. Thanks,Yoninah (talk)21:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that aconsensus discussion is underway about changingShlom bayit toShalom bayit. Please add your opinion atTalk:Shlom bayit#Requested move. Thank you,Yoninah (talk)23:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redaktor, I have create a Check Wikipedia output for yiwiki. Seehere. Please create a page in yiwiki and tell me the name of this page at my discussion page. So I can create the translation page. I will not create this site by my self, because I have every time trouble with this left-to-right writing. :-) --sk (talk)20:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redaktor, please translate thispage. Show for example:de:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia/Übersetzung. --sk (talk)07:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New interface! --sk (talk)07:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's a notorious anti-Semite/kook on Usenet, and he knows he's going to be reverted if you look at a couple of the edits I've reverted, so just here to make some sort of point I presume. There's no way I can AGF with him I'm afraid.Dougweller (talk)13:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And he's back.Dougweller (talk)09:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are rarely editing lately. I hope all is well. Please add your comment toTalk:Modi'in Illit#Ultra-Orthodox.2FHaredi. Thanks --Shuki (talk)21:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nableez is into making sure settlement articles suck with his POV because he certainly is not interested in improving the articles, but in any case, I'm not sure if MI is in the Shomron. --Shuki (talk)21:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor,

I saw that you edited the Rav Chaim Joseph Gottlieb of Stropkov.I am a descandant of the Rav and wanted to ask you if you are too or if you have any other relationship to Stropkov or the Gottlieb family.

Thank you and Shana Tova!Felix

(you can email me at fesky22188@web.de)—Precedingunsigned comment added byFesky22188 (talk •contribs)09:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I claim no relationship. --Redaktor (talk)22:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could have the image atthe Yiddish Wikipedia deleted? It is overriding an image at the Wikimedia Commons.User:Zscout370^{(Return Fire)}04:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find a file of this name at Wikimedia Commons. --Redaktor (talk)00:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have been kind enough to comment at the unresolvedWP:COI case atWikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/User:Yehoishophot Oliver, you may wish to know that it has now been nominated for arbitration. Feel free to review atWikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Chabad movement editors and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Requesting Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thank you for your input and patience,IZAK (talk)09:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if I might suggest something. The main Chareidi article is pretty good, but some of the supporting articles are relatively one-sided - not in the sense of negative, but in the sense of a distorted picture. Here are two that I saw.

1. World Agudath Israel. Nothing here about the modern (German) component, which founded the original organiztion. I commented further in the article discussion page.

2. Chareidim and Zionism (I forgot the exact title). There is nothing here about positive statements in this regard, and the Chareidi contributions to expanding the Yishuv (Petach Tikva, the new neighborhoods) and building the State. Unfortunately, while I have good sources, they are not usable for Wikipedia. It would be good with someone with access to the scholarship would redress this.--84.229.51.101 (talk)12:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor: Since you have been involved in the topic ofChabad, this is to let you know that an official arbitration case has been opened atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement. You may wish to add your comments for the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page,Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence. The ArbCom asks that evidence be submitted within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Workshop. Thanks,IZAK (talk)06:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redaktor! Thank you for your contributions. I am abot alerting you that1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Thebiographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensureverifiability, all biographies should be based onreliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current42 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the{{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mosheh Twersky -Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk)05:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redaktor: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please seeWikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence#Contemplated motion to dismiss. Thank you,IZAK (talk)08:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did toInternational reactions to the Gaza flotilla clash, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.Lihaas (talk)10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What personal analysis did I add? I am not accustomed to doing that sort of thing. --Redaktor (talk)10:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one ofyour recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted or removed. Please usethe sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read thewelcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Your two recents edits onGaza flotilla raid were heavily POV and have been reverted in accordance with the consensus on the talk page. Please make sure that you are following theWP:1RR restriction on the article. --386-DX (talk)15:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Despite the warning and the undoing of your reverts in diff 367194865, which were made without any discussion or agreement on the talk page, you made another one in less than 24 hours in diff 367195710, again containing numerous reverts and POV insertions. I'm therefore reporting you in the ANI board. --386-DX (talk)13:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This edit isreally unacceptable. Please don't do stuff like this. If you're unsure what's neutral and what's point-of-view, ask onthe talk page.

Cheers,TFOWR^{idle vapourings}15:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In a post at ANI an editor has noticed you violating the 1RR restriction atGaza flotilla raid. If you will apologize for this slip-up there may still be time for you to avoid sanctions. Due to the nature of 1RR restrictions they need to be mechanically enforced, unless the person violating will admit their mistake and promise not to repeat it.EdJohnston (talk)14:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would nice to be told exactly what I am supposed to have reverted. All I did was make what seemed to be a sensible edit. --Redaktor (talk)23:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PerWP:REVERT, "reverting may also refer to any action that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part". Whether you consider your change sensible or not, you can't make improvements that undo other people's changes more than once a day on this article. Most changes that don't add entirely new material turn out to be reverts. Small changes that don't alter meaning are usually exempt.EdJohnston (talk)04:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. On checking, I can see only one edit where I deleted anything (and even that one followed a discussion on the talk page). --Redaktor (talk)04:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedMosheh Twersky, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosheh Twersky. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Nomoskedasticity (talk)14:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion atTemplate talk:Housing associations in London.Fayenatic(talk) 19:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) -Fayenatic(talk)19:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re this diff: [[2]]- exactly so, all we can do is follow the sources. Thanks.Springnuts (talk)17:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rebbe needs to be fixed. “Issue1” should be: children from 1st wife; “Issue2” should be: children from 2nd wife, and so on. Perhaps you could help. (I tried to fix it myself but my revision was undone).------20:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could fix the change, but is there general agreement that the change is needed? --Redaktor (talk)14:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the need is self-understood. What does “Issue1” supposed to mean?------23:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The word "issue" means "children". The only thing that is self-evident is that users have been happy with the word issue for three years and it has caused them no problems. Does it really matter that much? --Redaktor (talk)06:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed obvious to me that this is a mistake because I have not known that this is a legitimate definition for the word "issue". Wouldn't it be better to use a word which is more easily understood? The fact that no one has complained to you about this until now does not necessarily mean that everyone was "happy with the word issue for three years and it has caused them no problems". Perhaps ithas caused other users problems in the past (just like it caused me), but: either they didn't know how to fix it and didn't know to whom to turn to, or they just didn't bother. After all, most people have more important issues (pun intended) to worry about.------22:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the change.------00:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was just wondering where you obtainedFile:UOHC.jpg from? I can't seem to find any web presence for these guys at all... Thanks!╟─TreasuryTag►secretariat─╢15:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember, but it is available on documents published by the UOHC. --Redaktor (talk)09:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to know what sort of documents they publish and/or one could get hold of any? Thanks,╟─TreasuryTag►Counsellor of State─╢20:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Their main publication is the annual "Hakohol". They also publish a diary and wall luach before Rosh Hashono, and numerous public announcements in shuls and in the Jewish press. --Redaktor (talk)23:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SeeHasidic dynasty article names.Chesdovi (talk)09:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should take a look at the amazingly long discussion over atTalk:Breslov (Hasidic dynasty)!Chesdovi (talk)13:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Redaktor (talk)10:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

הַנֵּרוֹת הַלָּלוּ קֹדֶשׁ הֵם

Hi Redaktor! Hoping you and yours arespiritually warmed by the holy lights of
חֲנֻכָּה

Chesdovi2010

Category:Galician rabbis, which you created, has been nominated fordeletion,merging, orrenaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you..IZAK (talk)17:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a bug in the softwaresee. But I presume the issue has been fixed because as from yesterday my bot has stopped making these errors after my daily update. -Foxie001 (talk)22:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. --Redaktor (talk)16:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear and Esteemed Colleague,

I write you from Calabria and with the Heart from Venezuela, because I have seen that you are practical in translations from English to Hebrew and the Yiddish one. I wondered me if one collaboration of yours would be possible, as I has already had her in passed by you to translate in these two languages the Article that I have signalled you. The Primo Riguarda my City of Adoption or rather Mérida, have found here good and kind people thanks also to a known social-network. In that times I suffered an illness that it strikes us young people: the anorexia, and here in My Country, I was abandoned from everybody, even from who believed friend and relative... only from Mérida, also from the Jewish community I received help with messagings of Peace, Courage and Hope. For this reason I have decided thanks to the help of other end users from the gold heart to make to know this angle of heaven in earth, where the people are cordial and also gives the heart if there is need.

As it regards the Feria del Sol, there it has also his because some Queens, among which the winner of 2008, now my great friend of the heart from 2009, thought me and they was with me during that long months of my hospitalization, also some organizers of the Legal holiday were worried for me and with me.

The most beautiful Gift that I have received has been the Hope thanks also to the Gift of an Angel that she lives to Mérida, and that it studies in theUniversity of the Andes, the Gift wasOur Lady of Coromoto. There Patrona of the Venezuela..da set out the tract toward the Recovery... happened after a few days by the arrival.

However this I ask you, if a lot kindly you would offer yourself to translate in Jewish and Yiddish Mérida and Your Great Bank holiday.... naturally when you have some available time.

Then as soon as it advances yourself some time if you could translate in Hebrew the Our Lady of Coromoto.

Said this hoping not to have annoyed you with this history, I wish you a good beginning week with the wish of one certain answer of yours, thanks for the help that you will give me and that God Blesses you

P.S. Sorry my bad english--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk)10:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you added Avrohom Eliezer Liber Rosenbaum (23:55, 13 December 2007). Would you know whose son he is?

------21:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess he is a son of Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac Rosenbaum ofStrozhnitz --Redaktor (talk)12:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBaal Shem Tov family tree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baal Shem Tov family tree until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Sitush (talk)16:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that many times throughout the site, you've changed Shotz to Shatz (examples:Suceava,Shotz (Hasidic dynasty)). Can I know why? Thanks.Ratzd'mishukribo (talk)14:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the town is שאַץ Shatz. It is a quirk of Eastern -Galitsyaner Yiddish, especially in Bukovina, to pronounce the אַ sound as (British) "o".

--Redaktor (talk)22:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me - but how do you know? In the case of a word or a town with a known alternate pronunciation, you can say that a perticular spelling is a local variant. However, I have found no evidence of any original source refering to Shotz as anything but Shotz. The town's name has always been spelled שאָץ, and was pronounced that way. My grandmother still speaks the dialect she was raised with - her parents were both Shotzers - and she pronounces no other word with an "o" instead of an "a". By the way, I speak, essentially, in the Eastern-Galician dialect, and the a->o shift you describe does not exist; it is considered "Russian" (central Ukrainian) or "Romanian" (not Bukovina, though, I think).

Examples of reliable sources referring to the town as Shotz include JewishGen, [shotzer.org](Sorry for writing incoherently - it's a little late here.)Ratzd'mishukribo (talk)00:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would be grateful to see any original sources; I have been unable find anything pre-war. I agree that the word is pronounced Shotz—that is how the locals pronounce the Yiddish pasekh e.g. האַנט ont. Thanks for your input. --Redaktor (talk)07:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, the traditional pronunciation of the name is alive in non-Romanian dialects. In Belz (Galician/Israeli), Bobov (Galician/Hungarian) and Satmar (Hungarian/Polish) they all say "Shotz". Incidentally, in the "ont" dialects, the "o" has a distinct sound, unlike the "o" in Shotz (think of Skver "Tote").
The spelling "Shatz" seems to have been invented by Rabbi Meir Horowitz of Shotz-Shendishov (of the Shatzer Matzos) - but his family also pronounces it "Shotz". I think they spelled it with an "a" by false analogy to words like "torah"/"toiroh". Similarly, "Tosh" is often spelled (by the Toshers themselves) as Tash, while it is quite clear (from the Yiddish spelling טאהש) that it was always pronounced with an "o".
In the manuscript of Rebbe Meir of Shotz (printed in Meorei Galitsya vol. 6, under his entry) he spells Shotz several times: שאָטץ - and he was from Galicia.
In any case, why assume that the original was with an "a" without evidence?Ratzd'mishukribo (talk)09:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the appropriate reference and reverted. See note atSuceava.Ratzd'mishukribo (talk)20:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see what I have done atTemplate:Mir Yeshiva as per your suggestion atTemplate talk:Mir Yeshiva. However, some of the biographies are somewhat vague as to under which location/locations they should be placed. Your input would be appreciated.Nerguy (talk)17:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks—that is a definite improvement. Will see if I can add anything useful. --Redaktor (talk)09:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A guten Reb Yeid. Asking for your valued opinion on whether to rename Category "Mishnah rabbis" to "Tannaim". Please comment atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Rabbis categories for renaming. Much obliged, as always.Chesdovi (talk)15:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do add yourselfhere Where are you?...approximately - "esperanto" has quite a few articles. Well done. We now have 45 editors and some recent additions in French and Estonian. I am hoping to present this work at Wikimania so your translation is particularly valuedVictuallers (talk)18:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeshaya Labin at Afd?Chesdovi (talk)17:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much to commend the article. --Redaktor (talk)07:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:UOHC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)09:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.Chesdovi (talk)10:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brother

I write you to know how you are and to wish you a Good Week, that radiant and bright. over this I would want to ask you if kindly you could translate in Yiddish and Hebrew, when obviously you have time, the Article regarding the Know University of the Andes of Mérida, there where one day I will go to visit my friends met on the known socialnetwork, and that they wait with anxiety my arrival, and perhaps it also escapes us some permanence of mine as student when I will live in Venezuela. says this if you have of need with some translation in the languages that I know por qualquiera cosa estoy a la orden!... you ask and I will make of my better..un I embrace bright and solar.--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk)16:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if you want i translate in spanish and italian this article:Yitzhak Aharon Korff, as well as in sicilian--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk)16:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Redaktor (talk)10:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank from tomorrow i think to start the article, max 1 week, and also i call my friend Marrovi to translate into spanish. have a good weekend. Shalom!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk)17:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IMMANUEL BEIT YAAKOV

Dear Redaktor

I noticed your interest in the Immanuel Beit Yaakov page.

Can you write in Hebrew? Would you be interested in helping add information to the Hebrew Immanuel and Immanuel Beit Yaakov pages? See under history and discussion for attempts made that were swiftly deleted.

Thank youBecky613 (talk)07:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Redaktor

I noticed your interest in the Immanuel Beit Yaakov page.

Can you write in Hebrew? Would you be interested in helping add information to the Hebrew Immanuel and Immanuel Beit Yaakov pages? See under history and discussion for attempts made that were swiftly deleted.

Thank you Becky613 (talk) 07:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byBecky613 (talk •contribs)

There has been a strange image dipictingYekusiel Yehuda Teitelbaum (II) since its creation in 2005?! Incredible that this was left undetected all this time. I have now corrected it.Chesdovi (talk)10:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This might be an odd request considering how dated... But I have been looking into what can be done to improve articles on the lesser known chasidic rebbes (lesser known in the grand scheme of rebbes...). Anyways I saw that 5 years ago you expanded the article onShulem Moshkovitz but didn't include any sources(at least that is how it appears). Is it possible for you to help include sources if you can recall/still have the information available?Coffeegirlyme (talk)·22:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have added two refs. --Redaktor (talk)14:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redaktor. You have new messages atAtefrat's talk page.
Message added07:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

OK I'm spamming a lot of people but I am very keen to get help from someone who speaks hebrew and Yiddish. Gibraltar has about six main languages and an important one is Hebrew and I think Yiddish for the Jews who live on the Rock. I'd like you to join this project, but if you are busy then could you post this on the Hebrew and Yiddish Wikipedias? If you can translate it then even better, but I would like to support the local Jews and get them involved in this project.Victuallers (talk)10:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please translate the text below into Hebrew (and Yiddish?) We would like to invite you to contribute to the GibraltarpediA project, the world's first WIkipedia City. The project needs writers, photographers, translators and others to help build the first wiki city which bridges Europe and Africa. We are going to transformGibraltar and the surrounding areas inMorocco andSpain into areas rich with encyclopedic content immediately accessible usingQR codes andNFC on plaques for visitors and local people. There are prizes to reward contributors in theGibraltarpedia Multilingual challenge for the best editors, photographs and cartographers...whoever you are. More atGibraltarpedia.org

Hi! I've done some work on improving this page. I'd like your feedback, since you wrote much of the original page. Note that I've mergedSulitz (Hasidic dynasty) andSasregen (Hasidic dynasty) in to Ropshitz. Thank you, and גמר חתימה טובה!Ratzd'mishukribo (talk)03:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:Skver (Hasidic dynasty)#Family tree.------21:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toKaroline Kaulla may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)14:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedKaroline Kaulla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFürstenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)15:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an editor has decided to change the way we identify Hasidic Rebbes who have the same names. Please see discussion atTalk:Yissachar Dov Rokeach I#Page rename. Thanks,Yoninah (talk)23:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if this message is not in your language. I've seen that -in 2011- you joined theDerby Multilingual Challenge. I just wanted to inform you that from March 16 to April 15 we organise theCatalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). It would be lovely to have you on board. :-)

We look forward to seeing you!

Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk)06:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Avraham Yehoshua Heshel#Heschel v Heshel--brewcrewer(yada, yada)17:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creatingChentshin (Hasidic dynasty). Are you able to add in-line references please? Would you be able to expand the page as well?Zigzig20s (talk)13:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedDov Berish Weidenfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSverdlovsk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redaktor. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redaktor. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redaktor. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleChentshin (Hasidic dynasty) has beenproposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.תנא קמא (talk)01:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:UOHC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rebbe has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Infobox Jewish leader. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.PPEMES (talk)13:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:UOHC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hasidic dynasties/stub has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)17:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Strikov (Hasidic dynasty), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Hey man im josh (talk)11:26, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Strikov (Hasidic dynasty) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk)10:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Redaktor!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Theroadislong (talk)10:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redaktor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Strikov (Hasidic dynasty), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)11:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pages with missing files
• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC