Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may beused abusively. It has beenblocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts areallowed, but not forillegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may bereverted ordeleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review theguide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use theUnblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or byadministrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation'sprivacy policy. Youmust not loosen or remove this block, or issue anIP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committeemay be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk)04:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HelloRandomCanadian! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access toAutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from theCheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it atWP:PERM/AWB. Thank you!—MusikBot II^talk17:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RandomCanadian. Ibelieve you may have it in reverese. There was not consensus on the removal of the long standing image. It was not a newly added controversy addition. Also the reasoning to remove it doesn’t seem consistent as articles likeSolomon have a contemporary image for a individual almost a millennium prior. I don’t see why the Tomislav painting was suddenly a major issue after the many years of was on the page. And plenty of other old figure articles have portraits from pater times. I see IP addresses verbally abusing each other but not rational dialogue. So I don’t know how to still feel about the deleting of the image. One IP claimed it was a Nazi painting? Or Nazi propaganda. Of which I am unaware if true.OyMosby (talk)00:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@OyMosby: RandomCanadian has been indef blocked for almost a year and will not be able to respond to this.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}00:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now. Thank you.OyMosby (talk)00:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it does't say that tpa was revoked in the log so he probably could respond here (and here only) if he wanted to, but is he likely to after all this time is another question... -wolf00:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure how/when you were banned but your efforts are missed. I hope you consider appealing in the future –Aza24 (talk)07:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the checkuser block was quite surprising, since you were a user in good standing, and inactive for months. I join Aza in encouraging you to appeal it. You were certainly a net positive around here and I would welcome you back. –Novem Linguae(talk)03:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I join fellow editors a in encouraging you to appeal. —Sadko(words are wind)01:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectWikipedia:NOLABLEAK has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 24 § Wikipedia:NOLABLEAK until a consensus is reached.RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk)11:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adam Cuerden has nominatedJ. K. Rowling for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]