User talk:Rain and Keet
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | HiRain and Keet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there! Delivered byHostBot on behalf of theTeahouse hosts 16:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onDylan McEvoy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)05:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onBacon McDouble, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.Yufitran (talk)03:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1969 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1970 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1970 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1971 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1971 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Jacksons TV Performances 1979 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1979 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Jacksons TV Performances 1977 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1977 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Jacksons TV Performances 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1975 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1975 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Xx236 (talk)11:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Rain and Keet,
I wanted to let you know that I just taggedJackson 5 TV Performances 1972 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at oursuggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.Xx236 (talk)11:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Rain and Keet,
I wanted to let you know that I just taggedJackson 5 TV Performances 1974 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at oursuggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.Xx236 (talk)11:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1972 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk07:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1973 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1973 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk07:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackson 5 TV Performances 1974 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk07:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such asChristian Orellana has sex with Elizabeth Stivala, is not in accordance with ourpolicies. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Undersection G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Savonneux (talk)04:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The articleThe Cure MTV Unplugged has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.WCQuidditch☎✎06:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according tosection G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages thatattack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and filesare not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may beblocked from editing.Cahk (talk)09:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is youronly warning; if you create aninappropriate page again, as you did atChristian Orellana has sex with Elizabeth Stivala, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Cahk (talk)09:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSaints in Art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints in Art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk07:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSaints in Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLamp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mRobvanvee. I noticed that you made a change to an article,HIStory World Tour, but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see thereferencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Robvanvee11:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLifespans of Parrot Species is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifespans of Parrot Species until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Banner talk07:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not removeArticles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments inArticles for deletion debates, as you did withLifespans of Parrot Species. Otherwise, it may be difficult to createconsensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, pleasecomment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from abot aboutthis edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, pleasereport it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online08:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Rain and Keet,
You should have noticed that all your articles have been nominated for deletion. Main reason for that is that your articles look like copy and past creations, lacking notability and sources.
It is absolutely no fun to shoot articles down but your production is just not up to the required standard. Please, can you improve that standard by providing more clear texts and most important: sources. Tell the world where you got your information, as detailed as possible. Don't worry about the exact form, there is help available.The Banner talk13:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The articleFisherman's basket has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Don't doubt it exists, have eaten it myself, but not seeing enough coverage of this as "a thing" to justify a WP article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.MatthewVanitas (talk)05:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]