User talk:Peter James
Page contents not supported in other languages.
If you want to leave a message, please do it at thebottom, as a newsection, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. Anddon't forget tosign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keepdiscussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, ifI leave a comment onyour talk page, please respond to itthere. Remember, we can use ourwatchlist andtopic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Archives | |
| |
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Peter James,
Thank you for find appropriate articles to redirect the articles that had been proposed deletion to. I think that is a much better solution than deletion but PRODs don't get as much attention for our editors as articles that are nominated for deletion at AFD. I appreciate you tracking down so relevant articles that are associated with articles that have been PROD'd.LizRead!Talk!21:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I just wanted to ask about an edit you made to the pageOut of the Blue (System F song). You added an 'unreliable sources' template, but I'm unsure on which sources are 'unreliable'. Most of the article is based on interviews with the writer of the song, making it first-hand information on the topic. The source I would think is least reliable is the note about the 'Essential Record of Week', but I still don't see a small fact like that as a cause of alarm for the whole article. Could you please clarify which references you thought were not appropriate?
Tedster41 (talk)08:26, 09 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sent byNPP Coordination usingMediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectHommage а l'amour has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 26 § Hommage а l'amour until a consensus is reached.Pkbwcgs (talk)19:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedArrochar Alps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCàrn Glas. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)17:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the{{proposed deletion/dated}} tag fromBodulgate, which you proposed for deletion. (Sources listed on article Talk page. May not be enough to support the article. Worth a wider discussion). If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add{{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it atWikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!Rupples (talk)11:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,Peter James. Looks as though I've made an error in de-prodding this. There appears to be two Bodulgates and the sources I've put on the talk page are for a different location. Not sure what to do. Apologies for the inconvenience.Rupples (talk)11:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The archaeological source does relate to this farm. The manor of Bodulgate is part ofBoconnoc civil parish, to the south.Rupples (talk)11:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave it up to you to decide if it's worthwhile to clean up the references in this article.76.14.122.5 (talk)02:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
HelloUser:Peter James, thank you for understanding my challenge. How do you suggest that I proceed? The refusal template said any Administrator can help me.SiniyaEdita (talk)15:16, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve undone your changes as they seem to have broken the links to the Historic England site. Very happy to discuss. Best regards.KJP1 (talk)21:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectWikilinks has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 8 § Wikilinks until a consensus is reached.Thepharoah17 (talk)04:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleDingo ate my baby has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A notable phrase, but we don't need a separate page for this. Let's redirect it toDeath of Azaria Chamberlain, where the phrase can be covered in appropriate depth.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Popcornfud (talk)16:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingo ate my baby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Popcornfud (talk)00:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)04:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
