Your proposal to merge the articles: RGSW and AO.

 Done Please help with any other info to be added. Removal of duplicated material, and of course, the old "double redirects!" Thanks,Btline (talk)18:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petepetepetepete,

Thanks for your note. I've made my case for reinstating the above entry on the discussion page. Please have a look at it. In essence, if the fleeting nature of a town's history cannot be recorded, then history as it is portrayed becomes exclusive not inclusive. Bye for now, Rhodian.—Precedingunsigned comment added byRhodian (talk •contribs)20:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually tucked away in the talk page archives, seehere andhere Which team did he play for, as from what I can tell he played for the all-Ireland team for the majority of his caps? Thanks.One Night In Hackney₃₀₃15:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying he played forIreland national football team (1882-1950)? As (according to the article) that continued to be an all-Ireland team while he was playing, and didn't even become "Northern Ireland" till well after Scott stopped playing. In addition that's backed up bythis which says he played for "Ireland" in 1928 andthis describes him as an "Irish International". So unless I've got this totally wrong, he never even played for a team called "Northern Ireland"?!One Night In Hackney₃₀₃20:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it really bothers you that much, describe him as Northern Irish. Just don't say he was born there please :)One Night In Hackney₃₀₃00:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the earliest publication date for this, as far as you know? Or when was the club founded? I'm doing some research on the tune.Pustelnik (talk)19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I'll let you know if anythings comes from the rest of the search.Pustelnik (talk)22:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made comments about this article on its talk page.ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been nominated for afeatured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article tofeatured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere. Reviewers' concerns arehere.JMcC (talk)16:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot (talk)23:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot (talk)15:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThe Bandwagon Club has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability asserted but unsourced; tagged for ten months.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theProposed Deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. TheSpeedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andArticles for Deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Rodhullandemu14:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot (talk)18:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot (talk)02:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pete (x4), I have just asked her personally whether she is an OBE or not; I will gladly revert it she really is! As there was no original reference for this, let's leave it out until we know? PETE, I HAVE SPOKEN TO SHEFALI: SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN O.B.E. AND WAS BORN IN MUMBAI, INDIA.

Martin91.110.236.38 (talk)21:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheArticles for Deletion discussion for2008 World Finals Odds which you participated in was closed due to a procedural matter. The disussion is opened again at atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 World Finals Odds (2nd nomination).davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)01:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please give your input.There is a dispute [[1]]--Kevinharte (talk)03:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petepetepetepete ! We now have a first review for GA. On the whole it doesn't look too bad. As you know, I am a local resident in absentia, and as a published author, a 'prose artist', but anything you can do to improve the language or address some of the more technical points as quickly as possible would be much appreciated. Any work on the new referencing system does not affect the overall quality and scope of the article for GA but you may be able to put some of the wrong referencing things right and offer some suggestions on the other points made by the reviewer. It would be great for the Worcs project to have a GA of this envergure in its repertoire. SeeTalk:Malvern, Worcestershire#GA Review - and Happy New Year!--Kudpung (talk)06:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Petepetepetepete! A non-British user seems to be attempting to suggest that the Brits are not pronouncing their own British place names correctly, and appears to believe that it is a policy of Wikipedia to instruct the Brits, through the use of theIPA, howBritish English should be pronounced. He/she also seems to be of the opinion that it is Wikipedia policy to regard British English by default as arhotic language, which it is not. Some British Wikipedians are trying to avoid an edit conflict and have requested my support. I have added my comments to the debate the non-British user has has started in defence of his/her multiple,WP:BOLD? changes to IPA pronunciations of British place names. As a professional linguist I accord every version of English its own particular merits and my position here strictly concerns the way in which the IPA is interpreted and applied in the Wikipedia, and how the current policy may need to be changed through a trulyrepresentative consensus. If you would like to help resolve this issue, please seeUser talk:Kudpung#IPA, RP, etc. andUser talk:Lfh#Warwickshire to get the background. Maybe you could then chime in with your views on the subject atWikipedia talk:IPA for English#Rhoticity in place names. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk)18:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheWORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - January 2010

TheWikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter No. 1 - January 2010 (Archivedhere.) 6 Mossley Hill (ward)(talk) Stub 6 Maryport railway station(talk) Stub Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions [edit] We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are: Views/Day Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days. Quality Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), currentassessment class, and predicted assessment class. The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions: Content Is more content needed? Headings Does this article have an appropriate section structure? Images Is the number of illustrative images about right? Links Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles? Sources For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article? SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know onSuggestBot's talk page. Regards fromNettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --SuggestBot (talk)23:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot [edit] We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on theSuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, asdescribed in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 2,634 Liverpool(talk) Add sources 3,105 Mein Kampf(talk) Add sources 57 History of Everton F.C.(talk) Add sources 1,976 Philippe Coutinho(talk) Add sources 5,818 Premier League(talk) Add sources 10 Bowlie Weekender(talk) Add sources 688 Sue Perkins(talk) Cleanup 18 Fuyang, Zhejiang(talk) Cleanup 8 Mathilde Blind(talk) Cleanup 6,282 Uruguay national football team(talk) Expand 26 Blackburn Rovers F.C. Reserves and Academy(talk) Expand 51 2004–05 in English football(talk) Expand 117 QI (I series)(talk) Unencyclopaedic 1,088 Alberto Aquilani(talk) Unencyclopaedic 54 Sefton Park(talk) Unencyclopaedic 4,075 Birmingham(talk) Merge 98 Collaborations between ex-Beatles(talk) Merge 22 Euan Sutherland(talk) Merge 13 Unbound (publisher)(talk) Wikify 6 Droitwich Spa Lido(talk) Wikify 333 Bez (dancer)(talk) Wikify 3 Rebecca Bisland(talk) Orphan 3 Alexander Masovianus(talk) Orphan 2 AOSEF(talk) Orphan 32 Salvatorian College(talk) Stub 9 Ombersley(talk) Stub 49 Laxmi Chhaya(talk) Stub 5 Picton (ward)(talk) Stub 20 Baazi (1984 film)(talk) Stub 5 Maryport railway station(talk) Stub ArbCom elections are now open! [edit] Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Newsletter WikiProject Worcestershire [edit] Worcestershire - one of England's oldest and still existing (with some minor boundary changes) ceremonial and political shires, famous for its nearly 1000 year old cathedral, the River Severn, theAONB of theMalvern Hills, some of the oldest schools in the country, England's fastest growing university, apples, pears, cider and cricket, and of course its world famoussauce. The Wikiproject is now in need of some attention. Created 12 years ago, this project amassed a huge resource for editors working on all kinds of articles and categories related in some way or another to the county.Kudpung is more or less retired from Wikipedia getting on for 2 years ago and it would be good if a group of editors could get it up to date and continue to maintain it. Opt out of this message listhere. WikiProject Worcestershire 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - May 2023 [edit] TheWORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - May 2023 TheWikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter Issue 3 - May 2023 (Archivedhere.) Welcome to the thirdWikiProject Worcestershire newsletter and the first one in (checks notes) THIRTEEN years! When I first joined this WikiProject back in December last year, I was slightly tempted to mark it as inactive, as activity had extremely slowed and there had been no new participants in 3 years. But I have decided to revive this project, as Worcestershire means a lot to me and I know it does for so many others. But as many participants of this project have disappeared completely off Wikipedia, this project is now in dire need of attention and it would be helpful if a group of editors could join me and continue to maintain it. Here goes for the third EXTREMELY irregular news bulletin... What's happened since last time Evolution of Worcestershire county boundaries since 1844 was promoted toGood article on 3 September 2014. Largely the work ofBellow558, a Worcestershire Project member, the article was reviewed byMike Christie. Hanley Castle High School was was promoted to Good article on 30 August 2012. There are 78 good articles for educational institution of all kinds of which there are 4 GA for secondary schools in the UK. Hanley High School is the first state school in the UK to become GA. Evesham was nominated on 2 December 2010 as aGood Article Candidate. The nomination unfortunately failed due to unforeseen unavailability of the editors working on the article. It only requires minor attention to be renominated. Worcester Castle was awarded Good Article status on 27 October 2011. Largely the work ofUser:Hchc2009 , the article was reviewed and promoted byUser:Malleus Fatuorum. The photo byDavid Iliff of the medieval cloisters inWorcester Cathedral(pictured above) appeared aspicture of the day on 5 October 2016. Urse d'Abetot was awarded Featured Article status on 13 October 2009. Promoted byKaranacs, the article was 96.4% the work ofEaldgyth. It was finally featured on the main page on 14 April 2018. TheBattle of Powick Bridge was awarded Featured Article status in 2020 and appeared on the Main Page on 12 February 2023. Worcestershire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 1 1 4 6 FL 1 1 GA 5 2 6 13 B 2 4 14 15 2 37 C 1 8 22 87 10 128 Start 13 52 412 46 523 Stub 5 567 30 602 List 3 7 29 39 NA 1 1 23 346 371 Assessed 3 35 104 1,144 346 88 1,720 Unassessed 3 5 8 Total 3 35 104 1,147 346 93 1,728 WikiWork factors (?) ω =6,871 Ω = 5.25 Experts needed! If you notice any editors contributing significantly toWorcestershire-related articles, then please ask them to join this WikiProject, as we need all the help we can get. Would you like to join theWP:WORCS?? Please enter yourself atWP:WORCS! - new editors are always welcome! Happy Wikying, and thanks to everyone else who has contributed to our articles. New project resources Before making any major edits to articles or stubs, please be sure to read the newWP:WORCS/HowTo.Urgent tasks are now listed at:WP:WORCS/ToDo. It should be referred to often, and will be your main stop for most maintenance tasks. We recommend keeping the page on your watchlist. Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire.The current priorities: Population Now that the2021 census details have been released, most settlement articles need updating. This website:https://www.citypopulation.de/ can be helpful, although you should note this does not collect data from hamlets or small villages. Monitor The watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Infoboxes Some of our articles need their infoboxes completing. References Please remember that thelist of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference. If you are uploadiing an image, be sure it has a correct FUR, and that you have preferably already created a link on the page where you want it to be. These lists will help: All Worcs related articles byABC Worcs related articles bytype. All Worcs related articles aboutpeople by ABC List ofall Schools in Worcestershire List by Class & Importance: Page 1 All categories except people (not yet tagged with WP banner) List by Class & Importance: Page 2 All categories except people (not yet tagged with WP banner). Guidelines How to write about settlements How to write about counties How to write about rivers How to write about people Missing civil parishes There is a project creating missing civil parish articles in England atUser:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Worcestershire currently are: Drakes Broughton and Wadborough Norton and Lenchwick South Lenches Stock and Bradley Stoke, Worcestershire Westwood, Worcestershire Evesham project I am currently planning on reforming theEvesham article to get it up to scratch for anotherGA nomination. If other editors are interested in helping me then please do, especially if you live in Evesham yourself, as the main photo is from 2008 and is out-of-date as there is a new statue in front of the building. On the newsletter I intend to write a brand-new newsletter once every two months, though I would like other editors to help me in completing it in case of my unavailability. Imprint Written byOllieisanerd (some sections are same as last time written byKudpung) • All comments toWT:WORCS Based on an original concept byWP:YORKS If you wish to opt-out of future Newsletters, please remove yourself fromthe Newsletter mailing list.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]