Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Hyperquaternions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk)02:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Pdelachartre!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!GoldRomean (talk)02:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, andwelcome to Wikipedia.Your user page may not meet Wikipedia'suser page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures ofconflicts of interest andpaid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• anencyclopedia article (and should not bestyled to look like one)
• a workspace for adraft article
• apersonal website, blog, or social media site
• a space forself-promotion or otheradvertising
• aCV, resumé or lengthyautobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information onwhat is andwhat is not considered acceptable content. Please use youruser sandbox or thedraft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you.Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk)13:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you meant to submitDraft:Hyperquaternions. Please improve the draft there by addressing the reviewers concerns and then resubmit by clicking the blue button. Do not recreate the draft article by cutting and pasting.Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk)13:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bobby Cohn,

I addressed the reviewer concerns by changing the format of the references given in the "Referencing for beginners".

Best regards,

Philippe DelachartrePdelachartre (talk)16:53, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Hyperquaternion. Thanks!BD2412T00:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lijil were:

This submission does not appear to be written inthe formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from aneutral point of view, and should refer to a range ofindependent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoidpeacock terms that promote the subject.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by alarge language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone,editorializing and otherwords to watch
• Vague, generic, andspeculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) andnon-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to readreliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. Seeour help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be generated by AI. It is poorly sourced, confusingly written, and it is also written in a style completely incomprehensible to anyone who is not a mathematician. A quick search of Google Scholar finds many articles with the term hyperquaternion in the title, so presumably the concept is notable - but as the previous reviewer commented, it seems strange that it is not mentioned in the article onQuaternion. If you want to revise this, please readWikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Mathematics and follow the guidelines there. Also please do NOT use AI-generated text as we are seeing many poor results from this throughout Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Hyperquaternion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk)08:56, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC