Yes, but be aware that a well-developed article is going to have genres according to authoritative sources. If you add or change genres with relatively weak sources such as Allmusic, you are likely to be reverted. Check outWikipedia:Identifying reliable sources andWikipedia:Citing sources for more information. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about the sources you are using. --Laser brain(talk)00:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changinggenres, as you did toPink Floyd, without providing asource or establishing aconsensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your ownpoint of view are considereddisruptive. Thank you. -Mlpearc(open channel)19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history atPink Floyd shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -Mlpearc(open channel)02:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Paintboxing reported by User:Mlpearc (Result: ). Thank you. -Mlpearc(open channel)02:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you report me? Sorry if the edition I made does not seem right but I just want to expand the article.

You are suspected ofsock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with thenotes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Iloveartrock. Thank you. -Mlpearc(open channel)14:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]