As a result of acommunity decision, broadediting restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to theSyrian Civil War. These sanctions are described atTalk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:

• Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, satisfy anystandard of behavior, or follow anynormal editorial process.
• If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban.
• Aone revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listedhere.
• Please familiarise yourself with the full decision atTalk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War.
• Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at theappropriate administrators' noticeboard.

Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged atTalk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications.

--Bbb23 (talk)16:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you warned me for the one revert rule. I may have strictly speaking done a second revert less than 24 hours after the first, but my last revert was yesterday, 22 hpurs before. I believe the aim of this rule is to stop editing wars, and I did the second revert 22 hours after... I thought it was alright to do it, it seems I was wrong.Oussj (talk)16:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pro governmentsource who used the editor Sopher for editing the city of Inkhil did not said that the city is under the control of the opposition and the secondsource which he used is pro opposition source and cant be used to display the rebels advances. So we should be noted the city Inkhil as contested. You agree with me?Hanibal911 (talk)13:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I did not read it completely. You rejected it because it didn't open, so when I saw that the link was working I reverted your change since you were opposed to Sopher99 change because of that. I was quite in a hurry then. After reading it I agree with you, they do not really say that Inkhil is rebel-held.