A tag has been placed onCategory:Rail transport diagram images indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!01:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objection from me - I think this dates from before the time when images were routinely hosted on Commons. —Voice of Clam (talk)07:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Voice of Clam,

I know you handle PROD articles and I'm hoping that if you are active tomorrow, around 20:00 UTC, you could delete some files that I had tagged. As the editor who tagged the images, I'm "involved" and can not delete them myself. I know you usually delete articles, not files, but I thought I'd post a note that if you are around the project tomorrow, maybe you could take care of them. Hope all is well with you!Liz^Read!Talk!00:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look when I get the chance. —Voice of Clam (talk)07:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find any expired PRODs, files or otherwise, unless I'm looking in the wrong place. Suspect someone else has already been in to clear up the backlog. —Voice of Clam (talk)22:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for doing a good job at blocking him to prevent further vandalism. However, there's just a slight correction. It's an IP address, and the template that was used is "You have been blocked", but the correct one is "Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked".35.141.142.199 (talk)14:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just used the standard{{uw-vblock}} template - if you feel the wording can be improved suggest it on the template's talk page. —Voice of Clam (talk)21:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment - I see there is an "anon=yes" optional parameter for that template, but where the anon edits are clearly coming from the same user I don't feel it's necessary, especially for a short block. —Voice of Clam (talk)07:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have come up with a different approach to the problem your edit[1] was made to solve (as I understand it). I think my edit summary explains my thinking. I was wondering if you agreed with that thinking.

Just curiosity – clearly if there are any issues this needs to move to the article talk page.ThoughtIdRetired_TIR19:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC news report (Ref 3) clearly states it was a passenger that was killed.Mjroots (talk)13:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjroots: My bad, I missed that in the body of the article, and just went on the headline and other reports. —Voice of Clam (talk)16:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isMe (DragonofBatley). Thank you.Tarlby^{(t) (c)}22:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there's an incident on the edit warring noticeboard regarding a user you were involved with. The link isWP:AN3#User:Isimmons1 reported by User:Danners430 (Result: )Danners430 (talk)15:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectBathgate (New) railway station has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 1 § Bathgate (New) railway station until a consensus is reached.JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)}21:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery