User talk:Onchigor
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi Onchigor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such astypo corrections or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please seeHelp:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.Mellk (talk)01:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did atBlini, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Mellk (talk)00:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pleasestop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.Illusion Flame (talk)00:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atMaslenitsa.CityOfSilver00:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isUser:Onchigor. Thank you.Mellk (talk)00:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently been editing Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated acontentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.