Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled bytalk page stalkers.

This user is busy inreal life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

TALK PAGE RULES

The talk page for my former account "Husnock" also redirects here

Hi OberRanks!

Sorry to pester you, I see you added content to the Golden Party Badge article. I'm having some trouble with one editor about what is allowed to be added and what isn't, regarding linking to an existing stand-alone article. I'm not asking for you to take sides, I'm trying to get some guidance here. I added to the content of the article by creating an Awards and Decorations section. I then added some awards and decorations and provided links to their own stand-alone pages on wiki. One editor in particular has now decided that some of them are "trivial" and I, and presumably anyone, is not allowed to refer to these stand-alone articles. This includes the Golden Party Badge and the Blood Order. I have had several sections of added content on the Röhm page, and others, deleted because of this so-called trivial/menial business, yet when I've asked for a hard and fast list of all the articles I'm not allowed to refer to via links, I've not been given one. I'm not sure why a stand-alone article exists if you're not allowed to link to it? What do you think I should do here? Just never refer to an existing article via a link or persevere and hope for the best. As it stands now I just add links and wait and see if they are deleted under this new totally ambiguous decision by this editor, and then wait for the inevitable aggressive warning. Not sure what to do! Could use your input on the Röhm talk page re this in general and the Golden Party Badge in particular. Sorry for bothering you mateTroy von Tempest (talk)03:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This a long running battle and, sadly, those of us who wish to include all Nazi awards in articles have been giving ground for about five years now. I answered on the talk page about using service record articles, which is at least a type of compromise, although even those types of articles may come under attack. I have actually given up this fight, and have taken my ranks and awards lists now to professional publications out in the real world. -O.R.^Comms03:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the image atnl:Josef Leipold. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)23:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They spelled it "Liepold" in the credits. I'm looking right at on Netflik :-) -O.R.^Comms23:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Leipold (credited as Josef Liepold) then. Or the explanatory note you just added, that works perfectly as well. Cheers, —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)23:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping such a close watch on that article. Please change the citation method if I didn't do it correctly. A woman I know sent me a link to a screenshot she uploaded from the credits as well. I tried to incorporate it. -O.R.^Comms23:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have added{{Page needed}} tags to two citations atService record of Karl Wolff and atHerbert Kappler[1][2], which were once added by you. Please be so kind and add the page numbers.Fut.Perf.☼19:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isOberRanks and fabricated sources.Fut.Perf.☼11:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked per community consensus. This has occurred per the very serious concerns about you presented atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § OberRanks and fabricated sources and atUser:Future Perfect at Sunrise/OberRanks, and as per clear and strong consensus at the ANI discussion for the block.North America¹⁰⁰⁰13:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHans Dobek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Dobek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Fut.Perf.☼13:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are indefinitely banned from editing the English Wikipedia, by community consensus -ANI discussion.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)17:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSpa Lady has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼06:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSS Personnel Main Office has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable administrative unit, largely or completely unsourced. Article created byUser:OberRanks, known for systematically falsifying sources; what little sourcing there is is dubious.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼06:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleWerner Pusch has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no sign of notability. Article byUser:OberRanks, known for systematic falsifications.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼06:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGermanic Proficiency Runes has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, dubious notability, created byUser:OberRanks, known for systematic falsifications

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼06:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDeutsche Uniformen has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no sign of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼06:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRolf Czurda has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable nazi officer. Article created byUser:OberRanks, known for systematically falsifying sources. Sources are unverifiable primary sources and/or dubious; contents largelyWP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼07:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KarlWolffLateWar.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown provenance and copyright status. Dubious source claim byUser:OberRanks, now banned for serial source falsifications. Source claim too vague to be verifiable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼12:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:AHWWII.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown provenance and copyright status. Dubious source claim by User:OberRanks, now banned for serial source falsifications. Source claim too vague to be verifiable. OberRanks has been known to lie about image sources repeatedly, so his claim that this is a free item from the National Archives cannot be believed without further proof.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼13:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHans Peter Dengel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Peter Dengel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Fut.Perf.☼11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleWerner Herrmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Herrmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)14:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDeadline (1984 film) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

FailsWP:NFILM. The reference states that film was released directly to video in the US. No secondary coverage except for fan sites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Rogermx (talk)22:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBolko von Schweinichen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolko von Schweinichen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Fut.Perf.☼18:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Duniform.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAlfred Radermacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Radermacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)13:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:ReinhardHeydrichFutureSelf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:RockwellMedals.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, 0% chance these were drawn in paint.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.B (talk)21:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:NPRCFrontFacingBuilding.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.B (talk)21:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMSeniorChiefInsignia.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "larger PD Image" from which this is said to be cropped was deleted perthis request. The creator of this one, OberRanks, is site banned for chronic fabrication of sources including repeated copyright violations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)09:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:CarpenterChiefKM.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Based onFile:KMSeniorChiefInsignia.jpg, which in turn was said to be cropped fromFile:Uffz Marine Portepee.jpg, which was deleted perthis request. The uploader, OberRanks, is site banned for chronic fabrication of sources including repeated copyright violations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)09:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:LionGuardEmblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:RockwellUSNRFOIANPRC.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, uploaded byUser:OberRanks, dubious source information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Fut.Perf.☼19:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRanks and insignia of the Hitler Youth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.K.e.coffman (talk)05:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleOberrottenführer has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable;Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth has been nominated for deletion. My BEFORE is just turning up passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.buidhe06:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

The person who operates this account in real life suffered some type of serious family loss last year and I believe he also had a mild heart attack. It is doubtful he has seen any of this. I can't speak to what he did on this website, but I would hope people do not wish him ill in real life. I just thought people should know. /Dee— Precedingunsigned comment added by100.36.37.43 (talk)16:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleOberrottenführer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oberrottenführer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.buidhe18:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSector admiral has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and unsourced article on a minor, largely made up, fictional element. While searches come up with a few pieces of fiction that use the phrase, there are no reliable sources discussing it in any substantial manner.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

The fileFile:FlakGunKMRate.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:FlyersRetiredBadge.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMVetChrvon.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KmChevron1.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMChevron3.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:ModrnDayRibSpread.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:MeritMedal.JPG has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMSeniorVetChvron.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMStaffSeniorChief.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMStaffChiefPettyOfficer.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMChiefPettyOfficer.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:KMMasterChiefShore.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:KMSeniorChief.jpg
• File:KMShoreChief.jpg
• File:KMVetShoreChief.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USServiceMedals has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.PPEMES (talk)16:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USDODAwards has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.PPEMES (talk)16:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USArmyAwards has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.PPEMES (talk)16:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USWWServiceMedals has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.PPEMES (talk)16:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:NavyRectangle.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJanice Chaikelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Chaikelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.SummerPhD^v2.019:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirectSpace program of the United States. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 26#Space program of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)12:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,Befehlsleiter. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page –Ranks and insignia of the Nazi Party. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged forspeedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out atRanks and insignia of the Nazi Party. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it atthe article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest thearticle creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.Bakertheacre^Chat/_{What I Baked}16:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:MeendsenBohlkenAdmiral.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, with an almost identical image on Commons (File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2004-1123-500, Kurt-Cäsar Hoffmann.jpg)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Wikiacc (¶)03:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSS-Oberabschnitt Weichsel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS-Oberabschnitt Weichsel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein22:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSS-Oberabschnitt Süd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS-Oberabschnitt Süd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein18:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirectLeo John (Schindler's List). The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Leo John (Schindler's List) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Dominicmgm (talk)22:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectJunker (SS rank) and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#Junker (SS rank) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Hildeoc (talk)18:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:PershingWWIRibs.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned raster image that was not used to create thecorresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.HouseBlaster^talk20:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:PershingWWIRibs.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.HouseBlaster^talk15:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Mail buoy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Furthermore OberRanks was blocked as a serial fabricator (t ·c)buidhe23:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMail buoy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail buoy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lithopsian (talk)14:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleStar Trek expanded universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek expanded universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖03:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SouthVietnamWarMedals has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)18:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleFleet admiral (science fiction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet admiral (science fiction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG(talk)12:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional military ranks has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}08:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:BryanStanyonRadio60s.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim ofnon-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Marchjuly (talk)05:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:RoyLeywood1965.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim ofnon-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Marchjuly (talk)05:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDaeryeong has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I did not find any sources to confirm this topic. Hence failsWP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Cocobb8 (💬talk • ✏️contribs)20:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:GidH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleObersturmmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obersturmmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walsh90210 (talk)17:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toInvasion of the United States. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseperWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasion of the United States.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Owen×☎23:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleKup (military rank) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This military range is dubious. It has been unreferenced since March 2009. I was unable to find any references/citations about the rank in a search. It also is not linked or even mention onNorth Korean military rank so propose deletion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Coldupnorth (talk)20:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMudeungbyeong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudeungbyeong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Coeusin (talk)12:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFlight Meteorologist insignia has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Chidgk1 (talk)17:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Pages with missing files