This user may have left Wikipedia. Tristessa de St Ange has not edited Wikipediasince November 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

Welcome back, Tristessa. Just thought I'd note a couple of observations about that mediation:

• The filing editor hasn't edited WP since April 1 (at least not signed-in; there are a couple of IP edits on other articles which might be him), has only 34 total edits, and no email account registered. You might have to move forward without him, but there's at least one other active editor who took the same position, so that may be possible.
• The discussion has moved on substantially at the article talk page with a number of additional editors joining in who weren't participating when the request was filed. There's not been any discussion, but a bit of editing in mainspace, on this point over a month, so there may not be a real or active dispute still pending. If there is a dispute, you might need to add some additional parties and get their consents.

Just thought you might like to know. Though I'm also a member of MedCom, I've not taken it because of potential bias on my part: I hate disputes about music genres and don't feel that I can bring anything to them. Best regards,TransporterMan (TALK)21:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump byAnna Frodesiak. Your commentshere is very much appreciated. Many thanks.Jim Carter throughMediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am currently in the nomination process of gettingNicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I was wondering whether you could take a look and possibly leave your thoughts/opposition/support for the nomination and leave any suggestions you may have to improve it. Thank you :)Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1KaneZolanski (talk)19:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:Albert Einstein. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:Dorje Shugden controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onDraft talk:Half-Life 3. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Amen (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views)

Your attention is called to a Request for comment atTalk:Daniel_Amen#RFC: List of journal articles.GeorgeLouis (talk)15:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TDSA, has there been any progress on the RfM? Looking at the case talk page, I see a great summary you added a couple of weeks ago, but nothing much since. It is a tough subject, I know. By all means email me if you want to discuss.Sunray (talk)01:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On this one, I'm not seeing a response to your proposal from the participants. Is it worth contacting them again? I can do that if you want. It may have gone stale, but that's your call. Let me know if you want me to either contact them, or close the case.Sunray (talk)01:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:Free! (anime). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the work you did on the articleT.B. Joshua back in 2008. I continued cleaning up all the references as they have been pretty much in the same state as they were in 2008. Many did not actually reference to anything related to the article and some were simply put there to make the article appear more neutral.Right now there is a heated discussion going on between me and one particular person who seems to be very interested in keeping this article as criticism-free as possible yet. I wouldn't call this an edit war yet but I would like to ask you to keep an eye on the article and its discussion. There seems to be a very heavy focus from at least one lobby group on it.

Gromobir (talk)12:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:Jennifer Rubin (journalist). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in therequest for comment onTalk:Disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromWikipedia:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC atOathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expertself-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." The content dispute is longstanding and new voices are welcome.Darkfrog24 (talk)00:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation toparticipate in the request for comment onTalk:Paul LePage. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please seeWP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries atWP:Feedback request service. —Legobot (talk)00:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I posted a RfC onTalk:Eliza_Jane_Scovill#RfC a while ago, but aside from the two people involved in the dispute nobody else has commented. Since you're signed up for the feedback request service, can I ask for your opinion? Thanks.Banedon (talk)02:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am soliciting comments for an RfC that iscurrently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it isoriginal research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome!Xanthis (talk)13:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got email. —TransporterMan (TALK)15:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.MadmanBot (talk)00:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.MadmanBot (talk)00:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.WJBscribe(talk)16:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:United States presidential election, 2016.Legobot (talk)00:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt whetherthis is acorrect way ofcommenting in talk pages. Note:ANI archived discussion.Mhhossein (talk)18:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson.Legobot (talk)00:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Sugar Mama (song).Legobot (talk)00:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Sophia Magdalena of Denmark.Legobot (talk)04:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Muhammad.Legobot (talk)04:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film.Legobot (talk)04:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of Doctor Who serials.Legobot (talk)04:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Trump: The Art of the Deal.Legobot (talk)04:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim.Legobot (talk)04:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Article titles.Legobot (talk)04:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Peyton Manning.Legobot (talk)04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Superman.Legobot (talk)04:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Sunni Islam.Legobot (talk)04:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Ted Cruz.Legobot (talk)04:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (policy).Legobot (talk)04:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Yisrael Katz (politician born 1955).Legobot (talk)04:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned"extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created followingthis community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016,a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updatinga report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please reviewthe protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note thatTOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on yourpreferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see thedeveloping help page for additional information.Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to thethread on the administrators' noticeboard.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tristessa de St Ange.

A new user group,New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin atPERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are availablehere but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us atWT:NPR.(Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it pleasesubscribe. Yourfeedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate •Schwede66 •K6ka •Ealdgyth •Ferret •Cyberpower678 •Mz7 •Primefac •Dodger67

Briangotts •JeremyA •BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• Adiscussion to workshop proposals to amend theadministrator inactivity policy atWikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementingPending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Followingan RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, anRfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation hasannounced a newcommunity health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee releaseda response to the Wikimedia Foundation'sstatement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.MadmanBot (talk)01:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —xaosflux^Talk15:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to remain active --Tristessa(talk)23:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wish you did stick around... I remember you under the old username, and you were the greatest. Hopefully and presumably you have gone on to better things.Herostratus (talk)02:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Abraham.Legobot (talk)04:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Ned Kelly.Legobot (talk)04:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:RuPaul's Drag Race.Legobot (talk)04:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Fabolous.Legobot (talk)04:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Shneur Odze.Legobot (talk)04:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Bob Stoops.Legobot (talk)04:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tristessa de St Ange,In recognition of your contibutions to Wikipedia I would like to invite you to become a representative of COVER, a Wikipedia support organisation for vulnerable editors. Please see the pageWikipedia:COVER organisation. Please leave an answer on my talk page.TomBarker23 (talk)09:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Stephen Paddock.Legobot (talk)04:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Notability (music).Legobot (talk)04:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:His Dark Materials.Legobot (talk)04:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Richard Blumenthal.Legobot (talk)04:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Emily Beecham.Legobot (talk)04:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. Further, following acommunity discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89bot00:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. Further, following acommunity discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89bot00:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. Further, following acommunity discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement atWP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —xaosflux^Talk13:05, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requestedatTalk:Nikola Tesla/Nationality and ethnicity on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. Sent at08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requestedatTalk:Marco Polo on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. Sent at08:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requestedatTalk:Famke Janssen on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at20:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Balcombe Street Gang on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at19:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:China Anne McClain on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at22:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Harassment on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at11:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at23:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at00:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Donald Trump on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at05:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Varg Vikernes on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at02:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Merging on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at23:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Liu Yifei on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at16:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Tommy Robinson (activist) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at12:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Figure Skating on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at01:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Kapamilya Channel on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at13:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Tommy Robinson (activist) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at15:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Dinesh D'Souza on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at17:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:People of Praise on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at20:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Cyberpunk 2077 on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at15:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at11:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Rules for Fools on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at01:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tristessa de St Ange! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to theFeedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to theFeedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under theRfC and/orGA headings.
3. Paste{{Frs user|Tristessa de St Ange|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), wherelimit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask onthe Feedback Request Service talk page, or onthe Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page.Thank you!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MedCom notification has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)10:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing you're not around much anymore, which is a bit sad. I was reviewing some contribs from my previous account just looking for areas I used to be involved in that might make for interesting opportunities in the future, and was slightly amused to note that you closed a thread on ANI way back in 2006 about another editor accusing me of stalking with what appears to be the very first instance of a thread on ANI being hatted/closed (in this case as nonsense). You even remarked that it was 'non-standard' but 'warranted'. Seems like that's become pretty standard practice ;) Anyway, thanks for the trip down memory lane, and hope to see you around again. --WhoIs 127.0.0.1ping/loopback13:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medcab1 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)05:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medcab case update has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medcab participant has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medcab-participant-update has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages