Hello, NSNW!Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on yourtalk page and ask your question there. Please remember tosign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining aWikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Clickhere for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in theedit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!Jauerbackdude?/dude.14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Introduction •Contributing to Wikipedia •Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia •Simplified ruleset How to:edit a page •upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view •Verifiability •No original research Reliable sources •Citing sources •Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not •Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) •Three-revert rule Copyrights •Non-free content •Image use policy External links •Spam •Vandalism •Sockpuppetry Deletion policy •Conflict of interest •Notability The Community Community Portal •Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith •Civility •Etiquette No personal attacks •Resolving disputes Build consensus •Village pump IRC channels •Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center •Be bold in editing Maintenance •Peer review •Requested articles Join a WikiProject •Translating articles Cleaning up:General •Copy editing •Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories •Disambiguation •Stubs User pages •Talk pages Useful templates •Tools •User scripts

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atNelson Agholor.Eagles 24/7 (C)20:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hi, you recently marked a warning on my talk page for changing the content ofNelson Agholor without proper sourcing. I apologize for my mistake, I meant to add sourcing but I forgot. I realized my mistake and started editing the page again to add sourcing. However I couldn't do it because the page was extended-confirmed protected before I could publish my edits. This isn't a request to edit the page, I just wanted to let you know that I intended to add sourcing, and that I acknowledge my mistakes and will work to remember so properly source my content in the future.@Eagles247:NSNW (talk)20:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Eagles247:NSNW

Hello, I'mFloorMadeOuttaFloor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Vice (2018 film), but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look atreferencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page.FloorMadeOuttaFloor^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)}16:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiNSNW! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,How to move a TOC back to its original spot after re-writing lede, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page).Muninnbot (talk)19:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NSNW! Your additions toBarry Sanders have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in thepublic domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under asuitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoidcopyright andplagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate asmall amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with doublequotation marks (") and cite the source using aninline citation. You can read about this atWikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See alsoHelp:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all informationin your own words and structure, in properparaphrase. Following the source's words too closely can createcopyright problems, so it is not permitted here; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources toverify the information and to demonstrate that the content is notoriginal research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.Fair use images must meet all ten of thenon-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, youmay be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable,to the world, into either thepublic domain (PD) or under asuitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. SeeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See alsoHelp:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must beblocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Diannaa (talk)23:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
37		Winston Hill(talk)	Add sources
323		DeMarco Murray(talk)	Add sources
227		Sam Mills(talk)	Add sources
12,101		Aaron Rodgers(talk)	Add sources
47		Henry Ellard(talk)	Add sources
297		2002 NFL season(talk)	Add sources
92		National Football League controversies(talk)	Cleanup
137		National Football League rivalries(talk)	Cleanup
3		2014 Sibiu Open – Singles(talk)	Cleanup
20		Madden NFL Football(talk)	Expand
1,009		Atlanta Falcons(talk)	Expand
8		2015 Big Ten Conference football season(talk)	Expand
1,166		Terrell Owens(talk)	Unencyclopaedic
112		Bert Jones(talk)	Unencyclopaedic
143		Dave Krieg(talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5		Dindi festival(talk)	Merge
3		Abdullah of Kalat(talk)	Merge
7		Powers & Perils(talk)	Merge
458		Daunte Culpepper(talk)	Wikify
52		Keith McCants(talk)	Wikify
3		John Buckley Bradbury(talk)	Wikify
1		Aurelius Dwight Parker(talk)	Orphan
12		Azerbaijan's construction in areas gained in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war(talk)	Orphan
4		Al-Sayyed Riyadh Al-Hakeem(talk)	Orphan
18		Terron Ward(talk)	Stub
8		Gordy Soltau(talk)	Stub
8		Bruce Gossett(talk)	Stub
23		Rickey Young(talk)	Stub
6		Gene Roberts (American football)(talk)	Stub
8		Karl Wilson(talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation and please get in touch onSuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromNettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --SuggestBot (talk)23:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleJulio Jones you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSteelerFan1933 --SteelerFan1933 (talk)21:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HiNSNW! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,GA reviewer that does not know what they are doing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page).Muninnbot (talk)19:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part?Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t ·c)buidhe04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJulio Jones you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Julio Jones for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaleeb18 --Kaleeb18 (talk)19:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJulio Jones you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Julio Jones for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaleeb18 --Kaleeb18 (talk)03:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleBarry Sanders you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaleeb18 --Kaleeb18 (talk)02:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBarry Sanders you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Barry Sanders for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaleeb18 --Kaleeb18 (talk)02:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBarry Sanders you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Barry Sanders for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaleeb18 --Kaleeb18 (talk)12:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me on making all the class and importance not assessed yet for the WikiProject American Football? Here is the page with all the unassesed articles:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Unassessed_American_football_articles&pageuntil=Wyoming+Mustangs#mw-pages.Sportsfangnome (talk)17:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, NSNW! The list you nominated,2012 NFL Draft, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers,PresN (talk) viaFACBot (talk)00:25, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleJonathan Taylor (American football) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofMike Christie --Mike Christie (talk)17:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleJerry Rice you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofMike Christie --Mike Christie (talk)03:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJerry Rice you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Jerry Rice for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofMike Christie --Mike Christie (talk)18:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJonathan Taylor (American football) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Jonathan Taylor (American football) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofMike Christie --Mike Christie (talk)02:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t ·c)buidhe05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

2006 United States House of Representatives elections in Georgia

added a link pointing toJim Marshall

2008 United States House of Representatives elections in Georgia

added a link pointing toJim Marshall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)18:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here orask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t ·c)buidhe02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on thevoting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, pleasereview the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF)23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, NSNW. I'm just posting to let you know that2012 NFL draft – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page asToday's featured list for February 10. The TFL blurb can be seenhere. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or atTFL talk. Regards,Giants2008 (Talk)22:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]