This user may have left Wikipedia. N328KF has not edited Wikipediasince 27 July 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archive:1 —2

Every other nav template for aircraft (other than, apparently, the Russian ones) doesn't list nicknames. Imagine if, for example,Template:X-planes had every nickname and manufacturer, like it once did; the thing would be longer than most of the articles it's included in. They take up a ton of space - for small templates like the Ilyushin one that might not be a problem, but the Tupolev one is 10 lines long (three lines wrap at 900px wide). For nav templates to be useful they need to be concise, and I don't think including NATO reporting names - which, I must point out, are not theiractual nicknames - does the job properly.ericg✈20:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This category's last CfD just closed yesterday. Why the rush to delete it? This seems very inappropriate but perhaps I'm missing something. --A. B.^(talk)21:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you are not a vandal I just didn't notice that you had reverted some of that bizarre vandalism to the page. The page had also been vandalised further since your edit, so no harm done, and no hard feelings hopefully! Regards,Mumby22:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why the < references > tag is being changed to {reflist}. Can you explain, and give me a link to how it works? Thanks. -BillCJ17:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a reason for the deletion- are you a vandal? There are "popular culture" references in many aircraft articles- these are well-researched and valid indications of the extent of popular interest in the P-38. To be considered "fancraft"= the submissions have to be "poorly written, unreferenced, unwikified, and non-neutral." Read the following: Fancruft is a term sometimes used in Wikipedia to imply that a selection of content is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. While "fancruft" is often a succinct and frank description of such accumulations, it also implies that the content is unimportant and the contributor's judgement of notability is lacking. Thus, use of this term may be regarded as pejorative, and when used in discussion about another editor's contributions, it can sometimes beregarded as uncivil and an assumption of bad faith.Bzuk 06:09 7 January (UTC).

In all fairness, the additions by Bzuk were not the usual cruft and he appears to have actually taken the time to research some of this material. I'm on the fence about the encyclopedic significance of contemporary war movies -- perhaps some input from WP:Air or MilHist might be helpful? I am a bit concerned that once the section appears, it will act as a magnet for crap but I would be willing to wait and see at this point. -Emt147^Burninate!07:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taking it upon yourself to deletion the section versus posting a topic on the talk page (via; P-38 or Bzuk's page) is pretty low. I think this reference contributes to the article, showing that it is an icon and has been featured in movies. To say that you are afraid that the section will become a "magnet for crap" is an asinine excuse for deletion. --Signaleer18:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what you may think or lack of, don't think you're above anyone else on here. Store that in your memory banks, thanks. --Signaleer19:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A cite in another article or at another website does no good to the article at hand. I tagged the statement and a reference was added, which is the whole purpose of the cite tags. No need to be so irritable about it (being irritable is my job). -Emt147^Burninate!18:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you go around Wikipedia policies and delete the text of my article on the CJ610? Though it is a derivative of the J85, there are enough differences, and wide enough usage to justify its own article. Please at least seek some consensus first.Akradecki01:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW...when merging the two articles, you didn't even bother bringing over the ref in the CJ610 which provided the info on the flight hours, and instead just put a cite needed tag...pleaseread the material before doing that.Akradecki01:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, I nommed this article for AfD, you might want to put your 2 cents in if you agree/disagree.Akradecki20:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring the fact tags on B-52. I hate complainers who remove them because they make the article look bad. -Emt147^Burninate!23:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If at all possible, please respond to my comments on the B-52 talk page. I am not trying to be a 'complainer', but a helpful editor.Donovan Ravenhull18:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're doing a lot of work with ref lists, maybe you can help me figure something out. Check out footnote 9 in theMojave Spaceport article. I can't seem to figure out the error that's causing the brackets to show in the footnote text. Thanks!Akradecki00:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Fridtjof Nansen (F310) 650x446.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Oden02:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YourImage:Air_India_737-777-787_Fleet.jpg has been listed as violating fair use criteria byUser:Angr. I don't think it does, but you should talk to Angr about it.Fresheneesz04:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, there's a guy who keeps taggingLearjet 35/36 as "reads like an ad". I disagree, I believe it's a straight-forward listing of facts. Would you mind reading the discussion on the article's talk page and weighing in? I don't really care what side you come down on, I just want an outside opinion. Thanks!Akradecki18:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I offered suggestions on the talk page already. It doesread like an advertisement, because, instead of discussing the jet in the article in a way that is usable for a reader unfamiliar with the jet, it gives specs. A list of spess is appropriate if someone is considering buying the plane, but that is not an appropriate thing to put on Wikipedia. If it's simply a list of specs, make the article a list of facts about the plane, lists are part of Wikipedia. But, please, don't call what you yourself admit is simply a listing of facts an article--it's not. If I wrote a botany article simply by listing facts about a plant, my text would be slapped with a need for clean-up tag and all sorts of tags, or other editors with expertise in the area would appropriately edit the article to make it readable. I can't write the article, although I did give suggestions, as I have no familiarity or expertise with the plane outside of flying in them as a passenger. Since I'm saying it reads like an advertising brochure thats a lists the specs, and you admit it IS a "straight-forward listing of facts" we're not actually disagreeing about that. However, you are saying that this is appropriate for an article. I am saying it is not.

Here are some general guidelines that apply:

• WP:Explain jargon:
• Explain jargon when you use it (see jargon). Remember that the person reading your article might not be someone educated or versed in your field, and so might not understand the subject-specific terms from that field. Terms which may go without a definition in an academic paper or a textbook may require one in Wikipedia.
• The first time an article uses a term that may not be clearly understood by a reader not familiar with the subject area, such as the terminology of a science, art, philosophy, etc. or the jargon of a particular trade or profession, introduce it with a short, clear explanation that is accessible to the normal English reader or based on terms previously defined in the article. Beware inaccuracies accompanying short explanations of technical terms with precise meanings.
• "Powered by two Garrett TFE731-2turbofan engines," "Theturbofans arepod-mounted on the sides of the rear fuselage." "The aircraft has aretractable tricycle landing gear, single steerable nose gear andmultiple-disc hydraulic brakes." Jargon, jargon, jargon, jargon, jargon.
• Wikipedia:Article development:
• [edit] Writing
• Start your article with a concise lead section or introduction defining the topic at hand and mentioning the most important points. The reader should be able to get a good overview by only reading the lead, which should be between one and four paragraphs long, depending on the length of the article. See Wikipedia:Lead section.
• Remember that, although you will be familiar with the subject you are writing about, readers of Wikipedia may not be, so it is important to establish the context of your article's subject early on. For instance, if you are writing an article about a sports event you should mention the sport and, if relevant, any national details: rather than
• The Red Cup was a domestic league competition that ran between 1994 and 1996
• it would be more helpful to write
• The Red Cup was a domestic rugby league competition in New Caledonia that ran between 1994 and 1996
• "The Learjet Model 35 and Model 36 are a series of multi-role business jets and military transport (designated by the U.S. Air Force as C-21)."
• This opening sentence is contextually an example of what not to write, it assumes that only readers familiar with Learjets, commuter aircraft, military aircraft and jets will be reading the article. That's not true, this is a general encyclopedia.
• Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles:
• Think of the reader
• Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia. The people who read it have different backgrounds, education and worldview from you. Try to make your article accessible to as many of them as possible. The reader is probably reading the article to learn. It's quite possible the reader knows nothing at all about the subject: the article needs to explain it to them.
• Again, lead paragraph sentences like this "Powered by two Garrett TFE731-2 turbofan engines, ..." don't consider the reader at all, at least not the Wikipedia reader, a person using ageneral encyclopedia.
• State the obvious
• State facts which may be obvious to you, but are not necessarily obvious to the reader. Usually, such a statement will be in the first sentence or two of the article. For example, consider this sentence:
• The Ford Thunderbird was conceived as a response to the Chevrolet Corvette and entered production for the 1955 model year.
• Here no mention is made of the Ford Thunderbird's fundamental nature: it is an automobile. It assumes that the reader already knows this—an assumption that may not be correct, especially if the reader is not familiar with Ford or Chevrolet. Perhaps instead:
• The Ford Thunderbird is a car manufactured in the USA by the Ford Motor Company.
• As I suggested, "The Learjet Model 35 and Model 36 are small jet aircrafts manufactured by Learjet of Wichita, Kansas in the 1980s."
• If other aircraft articles read like this, they should also be changed to conform to being usable by Wikipedia's general audience.
• Comments also posted on Learjet35/36 talk page.

KP Botany21:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this guy has passed the 3RR, don't you? -BillCJ02:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but which violation will get him blocked the fastest? Idon't think he's even reading the edit summaries. -BillCJ02:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, issued 3RR and my version of a soapbox warning (couldn't find a template). -BillCJ02:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AreUser:Nmramemphis andUser:66.130.128.89 the same person, or did the Karl Marx Home for Advanced Thought have 2 breakouts today? -BillCJ02:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the light tap on the shoulder. I get so sick of people who want to protect "Muslims" from us, but worry not a wit about protecting the rest of us from terrorists who happen to be muslim. For the record, my gripe is not with Muslims in general, but with those who do not speak out on behalf of what they claim is a peaceful religion being perverted by terrorists. Makes we wonder how peaceful their religion really is when they don't complain openly about its so-called perversion. -BillCJ03:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,Image:EMBRAER190 120304 13.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.SchuminWeb (Talk)05:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and useedit summaries when updating articles. TheMathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:

Edit summary usage for N328KF: 27% for major edits and 23% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk)17:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, I see a conflict in the quantity of aircraft listed in the article vs in the specs section. I've no idea which version is right, but the one in the article came from the footnoted source. It would well be wrong, but I thought I'd just point this out. I've no idea where the info in the specs section came from. And, BTW, sorry for the stomp fest!Akradecki18:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found out why some sources say 73, some say 74: thiscrash.Akradecki06:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to point out, after seeing the recent edit toBeechcraft Starship - there'salready a field for manufacturer. Most aircraft have model numbers, and that's the general/preferred convention for the infobox. In many cases, the manufacturer bumps the title up to two or more lines and looks rather unprofessional. Keep that in mind please! ;)ericg✈03:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've found myself doing another unappreciated pop-culture clean-up on theAutogyro‎ page. Any assitance would be appreciated. Thanks. -BillCJ21:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding where the figures came from, it was from a Hoovers corporate report about the company. I think the discrepancy is the fact that the GE figures include the whole Smiths Aerospace group figures, while the Hoovers numbers are about Smiths Aerospace Limited, the UK business excluding the American business. Anyway, I think your figures are the more accurate ones for the article - as it clearly refers to the entire division UK/US/ROW.Mark8319:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Of course he's right, it is uncited nonsense, even if it does concern the topic. -BillCJ23:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran across a couple of Gulfstream aircraft articles today, theGrumman Gulfstream II andGulfstream III) (which redircts toC-20 Gulfstream) in particular. Boy, what an absolute mess! It'll take a while to even make sense of what's there, and the fact that Gulfstream redesignated its new models won't make it any easier.

I'm going to post some ideas on theTalk:Gulfstream Aerospace page. I'm really not sure which direction to go on some things. Feel free to participate if you can. -BillCJ18:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. It wasn't my intention to start an edit war. I just wanted to improve the information aboutPluna on Wikipedia and include the pics in the articles. I thought a Pluna plane might look good as the main image for eitherBoeing 757 orBoeing 767 (not ATR, that was my mistake), but anyway I don't mind if it's not as long as it is in the article.

Later!--Wesborland23:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you used the abbreviation rvv in your edit summaryhere. It was likely just a typo as this was certainly not vandalism. Best wishes, --Guinnog19:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought so! --Guinnog19:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"butchering?" I invite you to go through the additions including pertinent images and removal of a movie patch AND read the wiki etiquette guidelines:

Principles of Wikipedia etiquetteAssume good faith. Wikipedia has worked remarkably well so far based on a policy of nearly complete freedom to edit. People come here to collaborate and write good articles. Treat others as you would have them treat you - even if they are new. We were all new once... Be polite, please! Keep in mind that raw text is ambiguous and often seems ruder than the same words coming from a person standing in front of you. Irony isn't always obvious - text comes without facial expressions, vocal inflection or body language.Be careful of the words you choose - what you intended might not be what others perceive, and what you read might not be what the author intended.

HJ14:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough....I'll admit I'm still a novice concerning the subtle nuances of formatting. Just didn't think you needed to characterize other's attempts to improve content as "butchering"

For about a year! Never worked on Requested Moves before, but that one caught my eye. There seemed to be no objections so happy to help.Mark8323:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheJanuary 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery bygrafikbot21:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making those edits. I mean well, but I'm not the most dedicated follower ofWP:MOS. Thank you for cleaning up after me! --Mdwyer05:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look atWikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken. It is not necessary to change redirects towinglet to point towingtip device. In fact, it is actually counterproductive, because if winglet were ever split off, all of these redirects would need to be changed back, and it would be more difficult to find them.Dhaluza13:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Sprint Nextel Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (seeour fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message fromBJBot20:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use images are *not* allowed on Wikipedia, when my bot tagged this image it was orphaned. The bot did what it was designed to do and did not make a mistake.BJ^Talk02:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is irrelevant, the image was not being used and it was fair use this is grounds for deletion. Human patrolers only spend a few seconds looking at an image, my bot spends a lot less and doesn't have a brain. Do you really expect anybody bot or human to find out the life story of an image before we tag it when we are working on a backlog in the tens of thousands? The bot properly tagged an image, you saw that and used the image in an article. Problem solved, I don't see how this is "Wanton botspam" or how it makes it an "idiot bot".BJ^Talk03:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:East-Dawning-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (seeour fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message fromBJBot05:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, pleasesign up here by February 11!

Delivered bygrafikbot11:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I said see Talk, I meant see discussion.Cronos118:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on your addition to theChurch Committee, looking forward to working with you in the future. Best wishes,Travb (talk)02:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph, saw your revert to the renaming, thanks. The guy does make a point in his edit summary, though. Since 720 redirects here, would you object if a added a brief sentence or half a sentence to the lead paragraph mentioning the 720 so readers won't feel lost? I've seen that technique used elsewhere, since the lead is supposed to be a brief overview/summary of the subject.Akradecki05:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Feel free to tweak it.Akradecki05:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could use help with an issue with a UAV article. There's a new article that's been created on a UAV,Dominator UAV. As I've been working on the UAV section for quite sometime, I tried moving this article toAeronautics Dominator to conform it toWikipedia:Naming conventions (aircraft), but the article's author,User:Headphonos insisted on moving it back (I get the impression that he's a newbie with attitude), asking for a "vote" before moving. We don't have "B-52 Bomber" or "Mustang Fighter" or "Globemaster Cargoplane", so why should a UAV article be an exception? When I asked the author, his response was "Don't care, the issue is the name, which is correct as per many articles under the +cat, pls don't contact me any further on the matter." Actually, when you look at the cat, most other UAV aricles conform to the standard naming convention (the exceptions being the ones we haven't upgraded yet), and I didn't see the need for a "vote" to comply with guidelines, but since that's what he wants, I'll go that route. So, rename to Aeronautics Defender, or leave alone? If you care to weigh in, pleas reply atTalk:Dominator UAV. Thanks!Akradecki16:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your movingDominator UAV toAeronautics Defense Dominator. You were originally reported toWP:AIV, which i removed because it was not vandalism. You were then reported toWP:ANI. I looked into it and agree with your moving of the article perWP:AIRCRAFT naming conventions. I have left a note withUser:Headphonos regarding this. If there are any more issues with this article, and protection or any other adminstrative action is necessary, please let me know. Thanks!-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)19:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, sorry about getting you involved in a stressful situation and then disappearing from the scene. I got called into work because our medivac helo broke, so I was up to my armpits in Bell 412 for a few hours. My abundant thanks to you and Chris for doing the brunt of the hard work with this issue.Akradecki02:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, given your usersname, I thought you'd like to see the view that greeted me as I walked out onto the ramp to go to work this morning (the two are rarely parked next to each other)...Image:Scaled-proteus-wk-070205-05cr-12.jpgAkradecki00:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing, I will check manually the mentioned categories for the wrong tags.STTW(talk)22:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, what do you mean by "resequencing". And gr and other minor errors are not generally triggers of a rollback. I'm inclined to hit "rollback" myself unless you have some good complaints. (reply here, i'll see it).Maury22:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the only information I removed was information pertaining to the YC-15, which was mis-placed and misleading. Specifically, the article talks about under-wing blowing, which the YC-14 didn't use. This is the portion that you re-added! As to the Coalier, simply type "Antonov An-72 YC-14" into google. Nothing of high quality, but for a "speculated" it's good enough IMHO.Maury23:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wondered if you could give a second (well third) opinion on this. I rated it as "Top" importance,Trevor MacInnis has said "I'm more inclined to sugest mid at most. The aviation related part of the company is BAE Systems Regional Aircraft, and this page is more of a corporate company article, only tangentially related to aviation."

I disagree about the only avitation related part of the company being BAE Regional Aircraft, this totally ignores the BAe/BAE participation in the Tornado. It totally ignores the fact that without BAe's design and Marconi Electronic Systems' avionics (both now BAE) the Typhoon would not be the aircraft it is today. Also F-35 paricipation and UAV research are important topics.

What do you think? I've left a request for an assesment which has so far yielded no response. Many thanks.Mark8322:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I butt in here? Trevor seems to have forgotten BAE Flight Systems, which has nothing to do with regional aircraft, but which builds the QF-4, and just finished theLockheed CATBird.Akradecki20:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wondered if you were willing to give a second opinion. I can respect if you don't value the assesment. It's not something I'm that interested in, I'm just pursuing this because, as you know, I have taken an interest in improving that particular article. Best regards,Mark8321:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor MacInnis raised it atTalk:BAE Systems/Comments. My request was atWikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Assessment (no. 13). Thanks.Mark8321:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my fat-fingeredness! GE90s on the seven oh...now that's something to ponder!Akradecki20:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Pleasevote here by February 25!

Delivered bygrafikbot14:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:EMB R-99B.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Chowbok☠20:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheFebruary 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered bygrafikbot16:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content withoutciting areliable source, as you did toTop Gun (film), is not consistent with our policy onattribution and verifiability. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please watch the POV push involving original thought.Ronbo7615:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:B777-Front-AirlinersNetPhotoID380542.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr18:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMarch 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery bygrafikbot19:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Cfm565.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr20:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
In the past you have editedAT&T Corporate Center. This week it has been selected as theWikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week aChicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipediafeatured article. Your input infuture selections would also be appreciated. See theTo Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger(talk/cont/bio)15:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:GE-36 UDF Domke.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr17:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there :) Thanks for the note - it's nice to see some familiar usernames still here. Where have I been? Basically, WikiStress got the better of me and I needed to take a break. Anyway, it's very good to be back and I'm glad to be contributing again. --Rlandmann06:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airreg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —A. B.^(talk)19:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheApril 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery bygrafikbot14:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:BoP Patch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (seeour fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot19:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:East Dawning logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}19:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:East Dawning logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 19:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}19:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Aeroflot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot03:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Arianespace Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot03:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:ILFC Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}06:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:MTU Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}19:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Arianespace Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}06:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:UTC 02L.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}06:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:UTC SA 02L.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand^{(talk •contribs •Bot)}06:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Boeing NLA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot13:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:McDonnell Douglas MD-12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot13:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:ATR logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot17:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Aérospatiale logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot21:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:GE Aviation logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot10:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:ILFC Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot00:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Rockwell Collins logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot04:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Spirit AeroSystems Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content and then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot08:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMay 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery bygrafikbot15:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:747-400_Dreamlifter.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.Rettetast22:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:AirNZ_789.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Rettetast22:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:ANA-7E7.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C12:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Aerion_SBJ_1.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C05:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Airbus_A330-200F.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C10:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheJune 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery bygrafikbot14:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Alvaro_de_Bazán_(F101).jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C08:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Qantas787-8.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page. –Quadell^{(talk) (random)}19:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:B787_Section_41.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C07:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:BBoP-1.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C08:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:BBoP-2.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C08:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:BCA_787_Flight_deck.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C08:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:BCA_787-8_3-View.svg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C08:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:BCA 787 Flight deck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot18:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:BCA 787-8 3-View.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot18:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:ANA-7E7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot18:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:B787 Section 41.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot19:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:GE90-115B-Blade.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Rettetast16:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:GM_Ultralite.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.Rettetast16:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:HV-911_conversion_mode_580x384.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Rettetast11:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Virgin Blue 777-300ER 20070321 BCA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot18:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message froman automated bot. A tag has been placed onImage:AirNZ 789.jpg, byRussavia (talk ·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted becauseImage:AirNZ 789.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of thenon-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deletingImage:AirNZ 789.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions atWP:WMD. Feel free to contact thebot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind thatthis bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 209:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, pleasesign up here by August 14!Kyriakos08:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:AirNZ 789.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.After Midnight⁰⁰⁰¹19:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Tupolev Tu-444 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per ourFair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Russavia00:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Lufthansa 747-830.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per ourFair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Russavia23:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Boeing_B-1R.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.MER-C11:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Boeing_737_AEW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 11:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.MER-C11:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Pleasevote here by August 28!Kirill01:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheAugust 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered bygrafikbot09:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Lexan bottles.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot13:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from arobot. You have recently uploadedImage:AWSTlogo140x55.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 10:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.If you believe you received this message in error, please notifythe bot's owner.OsamaKBOT10:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:HV-911_ground_3quarter_580x435.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Calliopejen100:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:HV-911_two_cutters_580x344.jpg as{{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add{{not orphan}} tothe image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.Calliopejen100:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,Axis plans for invasion of the United States during WWII, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axis plans for invasion of the United States during WWII. Thank you.

TheSeptember 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered bygrafikbot10:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:EADS 2005 AR Shareholders.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BetacommandBot14:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:East Dawning logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot05:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:FedEx Corp.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.00:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:FedEx Express.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.00:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:FedEx Kinko's.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.00:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:GECapital.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.19:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheOctober 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered bygrafikbot14:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message froman automated bot. A tag has been placed onImage:Wing.two.arp.600pix.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted becauseImage:Wing.two.arp.600pix.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deletingImage:Wing.two.arp.600pix.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions atWP:WMD. Feel free to contact thebot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind thatthis bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, clickhereCSDWarnBot05:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F-4 Phantom II has been nominated for afeatured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article tofeatured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere. Reviewers' concerns arehere.

TheNovember 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot02:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Jetstar787-8.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.High on a tree (talk)07:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:Boeing P-8 Poseidon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Chris.B (talk)17:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Sukhoi RRJ.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe media description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per ourFair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot^(talk)01:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:EMB R-99A.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk)05:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Scaled_395-L.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Rettetast (talk)22:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Scaled_396-L.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.Rettetast (talk)22:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the articleBoeing Yellowstone Project, suggesting that it be deleted according to theproposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see alsoWikipedia:What Wikipedia is not andWikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues atits talk page. If you remove the{{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent toWikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.BJBot (talk)18:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominatedBoeing Yellowstone Project, an article on which you have worked or that you created, fordeletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing Yellowstone Project and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.BJBot (talk)18:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Virgin America logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk)02:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Orbital_Sciences_logo.gif as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Some examples can be found atWikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.Project FMF (talk)23:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:CFMI_Logo.jpg as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Some examples can be found atWikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.Project FMF (talk)23:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:Jdw_logo1.gif as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Some examples can be found atWikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.Project FMF (talk)00:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:Boeing KC-767-1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Rossrs (talk)12:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:KKR.png as{{no rationale}}, because it does not provide afair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable forfair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with thefair use rationale guideline, onthe image description page. Some examples can be found atWikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.Project FMF (talk)03:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toImage:LSE logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Project FMF (talk)03:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:MC2A.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 15:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.≈talk15:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingImage:MMA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk)12:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:UTC 02L.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Gr1st (talk)12:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Boeing 747-400LCF 2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim offair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe media description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before13 July2006), per ournon-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Do you want toopt out of receiving this notice?High on a tree (talk)02:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,Image:FedEx 777F Artwork BCA.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Do you want toopt out of receiving this notice?High on a tree (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)High on a tree (talk)20:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered,Image:Fallschirmjäger.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on theimage description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Daggerstab (talk)18:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheApril 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)01:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheMay 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)01:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:FedEx Kinko's.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BJBot (talk)01:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheJune 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedImage:SpaceShipOne_WhiteKnight.jpg as{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} tothe image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to thethe image talk page.Rettetast (talk)09:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:ILS Logo BW.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BJBot (talk)05:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheJuly 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)02:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheAugust 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Global Crossing logo.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim offair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meetsWikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have anexplanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is anon-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice byFairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk)03:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Pleasevote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:NW CompassAirlines Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim offair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meetsWikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have anexplanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is anon-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice byFairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk)02:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheSeptember 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedCategory:Soviet and Russian intelligence agencies (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs) for renaming toCategory:Soviet intelligence agencies (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atthe discussion page. Thank you.Russavia^{DialogueStalk me}03:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectLost Wages. Since you had some involvement with theLost Wages redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).Eastlaw (talk)04:41, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have left WP. SandyGeorgia asks me to ask people about FAC nomination. Let me know.Chergles (talk)18:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedKDX-III Ahn Yong-Bok class destroyer (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atthe discussion page. Thank you.Arbiteroftruth (talk)21:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Goodrich logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, it is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.BJBot (talk)05:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:USS Kidd (DDG-993).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.06:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. The nominated article isWhite elephant. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/White elephant. Please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by abot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk)01:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedRapid Equipping Force, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid Equipping Force. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ► 18:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:MMA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)15:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of theAviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in theAviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign uphere, read up on the ruleshere, and discuss the contesthere. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedbackhere, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -TrevorMacInnis^contribs03:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:GECAS Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.ZooFari23:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:GE Aviation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.ZooFari03:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Lufthansa 747-830.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)00:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:USS Callaghan (DDG-994).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have createdin your upload log.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia'scriteria for speedy deletion,F4. If the image iscopyrighted andnon-free,the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC) perspeedy deletion criterionF7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)16:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:USS Scott (DDG-995).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have createdin your upload log.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia'scriteria for speedy deletion,F4. If the image iscopyrighted andnon-free,the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC) perspeedy deletion criterionF7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)16:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:BoP Patch.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)11:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:LSE logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am abot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this noticeafter the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, clickhere to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it offhere and leave a message onmy owner's talk page.

Thank you.DASHBot (talk)05:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Boeing 747-8F Large.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim offair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe media description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per ournon-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Denniss (talk)22:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)23:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFile:America's Cup.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Kelly^hi!07:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLost wages has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dicdef

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.—Gavia immer (talk)04:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:NW CompassAirlines Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Hugahoody (talk)20:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boeing Year disambiguation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.DePiep (talk)15:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions •The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients •bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom. Past editions may be viewedhere.BrownBot (talk)21:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectAnybody but Bush, Except for Kerry. Since you had some involvement with theAnybody but Bush, Except for Kerry redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).TJRC (talk)01:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)16:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)04:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:USS Chandler (DDG-996).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have createdin your upload log.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia'scriteria for speedy deletion,F4. If the image iscopyrighted andnon-free,the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC) perspeedy deletion criterionF7. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)20:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)23:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project News:From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial:Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)23:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Virgin America logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Courcelles04:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed:Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)23:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed:WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)22:44, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Sprint Nextel Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Colourlines (talk)21:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBoeing fuselage Section 41 has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not especially notable section of an aircraft.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.The Bushranger_{One ping only}08:29, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBoeing fuselage Section 41 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing fuselage Section 41 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.The Bushranger_{One ping only}02:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do sohere. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of thecoordinators,Nick-D (talk) andEd ^{[talk][majestic titan]}23:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)You were sent this message because you are a listed as amember of theMilitary history WikiProject.[reply]

A tag has been placed onBBJ, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please readthe general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well asthe guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding anycitations from independentreliable sources to ensure that the article will beverifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Yunshui 雲‍水08:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Aerion logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)03:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:NASA KC-135 winglet fig026.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Magog the Ogre (talk)01:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Boeing 747-8I Large.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Peripitus(Talk)10:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject has started its2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of thecurrent coordinators on their talk page.This message was delivered here because you are amember of the Military history WikiProject. –Military history coordinators (about the project •what coordinators do) 09:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I note you uploaded this media, would you mind expanding the fair use rationale so it addresses ALL 10 points ofWP:NFCC?Sfan00 IMG (talk)23:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:XF8U-3 1 from Vought.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)23:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:XF8U-3 2 from Vought.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)23:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedUnited Network for Organ Sharing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesWashington andGeorgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)18:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organ transplantation journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you.Randykitty (talk)10:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote,Kapusta kiszona duszona, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia'snotability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may bemerged,redirected, ordeleted. Please consider addingreliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:Find sources: "Kapusta kiszona duszona" – news ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR ·free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia!VoxelBot19:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article, thank you. Richard was a friend of mine, and you've done a fine job concisely summarizing his life and work.Captain Conundrum (talk)21:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSpies Like Us, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageI'll Be Loving You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of Boeing customer codes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boeing customer codes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.BDD (talk)21:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The articlePhyQuest Connexion has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim of notability. Fails GNG - unsourced, couldn't find a source, site dead

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Widefox;talk20:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:GECapital.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.kashmiri^TALK21:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectAnybody but Bush, Except for Kerry. Since you had some involvement with theAnybody but Bush, Except for Kerry redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk)13:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours,Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The articleList of Boeing 787 orders and deliveries has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Why is this here? WIKIPEDIAISNOT, Your opinion is requested due to your contributions to this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.L3X1My Complaint Desk22:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleIntegrated Defence Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Defence Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.16:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Tupolev Tu-444 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.The Bushranger_{One ping only}06:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleToyota Winglet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota Winglet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Dennis Bratland (talk)19:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Spirit AeroSystems Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:CFM International (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)02:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:TOPGUN Controller patch.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:NASA F8U-3.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Rockwell Collins logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Energia ball logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team.Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]