User talk:Morsecoder
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Welcome!
Hello, Morsecoder, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --WikHead (talk)18:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onShivdeep waman lande requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate22:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The articleShivdeep waman lande has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.ZZArch talk to me22:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to pursue deletion of the articleAnand Lal Shimpi, you need to nominate it atArticles for deletion. None of thespeedy deletion criteria apply to this article, and it is permanently ineligible forproposed deletion. —KuyaBriBriTalk22:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleShivdeep waman lande is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivdeep waman lande until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.ZZArch talk to me07:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did toPakistan. Your edits appear to bevandalism and have beenreverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, pleasecite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article'stalk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use thesandbox. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk)11:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
writing genune content with genune references is not called vanadalism. Please refer the defination ofvandalism for more details before writing posts on my talk page --Morsecoder (talk)12:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking thethree-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to ablock.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article'stalk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection. You may still be blocked foredit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --lTopGunl (talk)12:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are on two reverts, please do not revert again. Let the discussion on talk do the job.Darkness Shines (talk)12:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleShivdeep Lande is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivdeep Lande until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Uncletomwood (talk)06:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The articleShivdeep Lande has beenproposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.