Hello, @Locust member. Was coming to ask if you know who “J. Fountain” is on the writers track listing section ofMegan (album), i’ve spent a while trying to figure out who it is but couldn’t. Do you? Thank you,Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥11:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Cowboygilbert! From what I found, J. Fountain is the artist Jay Da 3rd, who's real name is Joe Fountain. I found this from Kstylis' "Booty Hopscotch", which is sampled in Megan Thee Stallion's "Where Them Girls At", in which Kstylis (Kordero Williams) and Jay Da 3rd (Jay Fountain) are credited as songwriters. I didn't realize that I missed this person when editing the page, sorry.Locust member (talk)15:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, your fine. Thank you for finding this, I didn’t see any samples in on WhoSampled when I checked it. Thank you,Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥16:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleI Care So Much That I Don't Care at All you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)22:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome!! Thank you so much! 😆Locust member (talk)22:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yw //Chchcheckit (talk)23:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have a question regarding the article. I had a couple of twitter friends give me some photos from his I Care So Much tour that I’d like to use in the article. A. do you know how to credit them so the copyright knows they “donated” these photos to wikimedia and B. would it impede the article’s chances on achieving GA? Thanks!Locust member (talk)21:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

from what i know/understand: 1. They would have toupload the imagesthemselves towikimedia commons and, in turn, agree to upload them under a creative commons license. 2. i wouldn't think so unless the images uploaded aren't theirs? for further information you should refer (you/them?) to:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files,https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team, andhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:A_picture_of_you#Ways_to_submit_photos

Hope this helps. //Chchcheckit (talk)00:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this helped, thank you so much!Locust member (talk)03:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleI Care So Much That I Don't Care at All you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All for comments about the article, andTalk:I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)11:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, thank you so much for reviewing this!Locust member (talk)12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your work onThe Fool! If you end up nominating it forGA, I would be happy to review it.CarbonLollipop (talk)06:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo, thanks! I just nominated it.Locust member (talk)13:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleThe Fool (Bladee album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCarbonLollipop --CarbonLollipop (talk)04:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThe Fool (Bladee album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:The Fool (Bladee album) for comments about the article, andTalk:The Fool (Bladee album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCarbonLollipop --CarbonLollipop (talk)05:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!CarbonLollipop (talk)05:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hell yeah!! Thanks for the review!Locust member (talk)12:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCypress Grove (EP) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofDxneo --Dxneo (talk)02:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCypress Grove (EP) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Cypress Grove (EP) andTalk:Cypress Grove (EP)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofDxneo --Dxneo (talk)16:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleAll Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)03:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCypress Grove (EP) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cypress Grove (EP) for comments about the article, andTalk:Cypress Grove (EP)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofDxneo --Dxneo (talk)04:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAll Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) andTalk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)05:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAll Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) for comments about the article, andTalk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)22:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on this new GA! Glad to have worked with you in my first review. Hope I see you in future GANs! :)CatchMe (talk)22:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo! Thanks so much! Very glad to have worked with you myself, it was a pleasure. Hope to see you around as well! :DLocust member (talk)22:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an incorrect edit summary.DuncanHill (talk)22:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what else I could do then. I changed the year on the source and it links to a full source. What else is needed to be done?Locust member (talk)22:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't have made that edit summary. I correctly marked it as needing a full citation. You incorrectly said there was one. Instead of acknowledging your mistake, you chose to falsely claim that I had made one.DuncanHill (talk)22:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm sorry about that. I thought you were saying that there was no source for that to go to. I didn't realize I made a mistake with the year on that particular source, I wasn't trying to be malicious, I was just confused by what you meant. I acknowledged my mistake afterward and changed the year. Sorry about thatLocust member (talk)22:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Music Barnstar
		For your excellent work improving music articles, especially ones related to Bladee albums. You're amazing.Skyshiftertalk13:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Believe it or not, yourDariacore article is very influential on how to write a short good article, which helps with the Bladee albums since most have very limited info on them. Appreciate you as well!Locust member (talk)20:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleGood Riddance (album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)19:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGood Riddance (album) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Good Riddance (album) andTalk:Good Riddance (album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)00:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGood Riddance (album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Good Riddance (album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Good Riddance (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)04:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your work onLet's Start Here andStoney. It's nice to see editors getting music-related articles to good article status.

TheAmazingPeanuts (talk)16:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it! 😆Locust member (talk)16:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleThen I'll Be Happy (EP) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)10:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThen I'll Be Happy (EP) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP) andTalk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)11:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThen I'll Be Happy (EP) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP) for comments about the article, andTalk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)16:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSympathy Is a Knife you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Sympathy Is a Knife andTalk:Sympathy Is a Knife/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)23:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSympathy Is a Knife you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Sympathy Is a Knife for comments about the article, andTalk:Sympathy Is a Knife/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)07:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleStoney (album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)15:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AstrooKai (Talk)20:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks for taking this!Locust member (talk)20:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On3 January 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleI Care So Much That I Don't Care at All, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatGlaive recorded the first track forI Care So Much That I Don't Care at All at the age of 17? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk)00:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleMagic I Want U you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLunaEclipse --LunaEclipse (talk)00:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleEversince you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)01:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCloak n Dagger you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Cloak n Dagger andTalk:Cloak n Dagger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)20:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCloak n Dagger you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cloak n Dagger for comments about the article, andTalk:Cloak n Dagger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)20:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you are a user who frequentsWP:GAN and thought you might be interested inGood Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return.Check out the project page for more details! — 💽LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)}13:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will take a look at this.Locust member (talk)14:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCensus Designated you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)01:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMagic I Want U you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Magic I Want U for comments about the article, andTalk:Magic I Want U/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLunaEclipse --LunaEclipse (talk)20:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEversince you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Eversince andTalk:Eversince/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)20:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEversince you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Eversince for comments about the article, andTalk:Eversince/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)22:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCensus Designated you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Census Designated andTalk:Census Designated/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)06:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCensus Designated you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Census Designated for comments about the article, andTalk:Census Designated/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)16:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Locust member. Thank you for your work onThen I'll Be Happy (EP). Another editor,North8000, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|North8000}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk)16:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Revengeseekerz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleDo Hollywood you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)15:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback on Phenomenon, I appreciate it. I'll see if I can rework it further.VistaSunset (talk)04:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I see you did great work over atEnglish Standard Version. Phenomenon definitely has the chops for good article, but it just is not ready yet. If you need any help with expanding the article or want to put it up for another review, I will be more than happy to help. :-)Locust member (talk)04:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On20 January 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleGood Riddance (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatGracie Abrams wroteGood Riddance about her breakup from her former collaborator and boyfriend,Blake Slatkin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Good Riddance (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Good Riddance (album)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)12:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDo Hollywood you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Do Hollywood for comments about the article, andTalk:Do Hollywood/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)21:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCold Visions you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCarbonLollipop --CarbonLollipop (talk)03:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCold Visions you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cold Visions for comments about the article, andTalk:Cold Visions/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCarbonLollipop --CarbonLollipop (talk)22:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On25 January 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleSympathy Is a Knife, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that fans speculated thatCharli XCX wrote "Sympathy Is a Knife" about Taylor Swift and her relationship with Matty Healy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Sympathy Is a Knife. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Sympathy Is a Knife), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

1=Launchballer12:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMore than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) andTalk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)00:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMore than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) for comments about the article, andTalk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)16:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleI Love You, I'm Sorry you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)11:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleAmerican Teenager you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)12:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleDear Amelia you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)12:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleOut on Bond you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Out on Bond andTalk:Out on Bond/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)13:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleBack in Action (EP) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)16:05, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleKeep It Goin Xav you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Keep It Goin Xav andTalk:Keep It Goin Xav/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)22:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleOut on Bond you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Out on Bond for comments about the article, andTalk:Out on Bond/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)23:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleKeep It Goin Xav you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Keep It Goin Xav for comments about the article, andTalk:Keep It Goin Xav/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)00:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBack in Action (EP) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Back in Action (EP) for comments about the article, andTalk:Back in Action (EP)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)02:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleI Love You, I'm Sorry you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:I Love You, I'm Sorry for comments about the article, andTalk:I Love You, I'm Sorry/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)03:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleStoney (album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Stoney (album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Stoney (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)13:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also wanted to say sorry for being slow about the review. //Chchcheckit (talk)13:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries !! Thank u for reviewing!Locust member (talk)13:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDear Amelia you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Dear Amelia for comments about the article, andTalk:Dear Amelia/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)08:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAmerican Teenager you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:American Teenager for comments about the article, andTalk:American Teenager/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)03:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleBoneyard AKA Fearmonger you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)03:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On7 February 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleCloak n Dagger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theAirbnb homestay wherea song was recorded byGlaive andEricdoa was dubbed by fans as the "HyperpopHype House"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Cloak n Dagger. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Cloak n Dagger), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBoneyard AKA Fearmonger you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Boneyard AKA Fearmonger for comments about the article, andTalk:Boneyard AKA Fearmonger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)19:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On11 February 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleCensus Designated, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatJane Remover was inspired to createCensus Designated after a self-described "near-death experience" traveling through a blizzard? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Census Designated. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Census Designated), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk)00:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleHoly Smokes (Trippie Redd song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofShoot for the Stars --Shoot for the Stars (talk)05:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw you did most of the work on the census designated article that got DYK, you're a legend thank you. I love Jane removerTombomp (talk/contribs)18:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my work !! I am trying to get digicore as much coverage as it can get on here.Locust member (talk)20:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBoy (2hollis album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Boy (2hollis album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Boy (2hollis album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)20:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleHoly Smokes (Trippie Redd song) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) andTalk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofShoot for the Stars --Shoot for the Stars (talk)11:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleHoly Smokes (Trippie Redd song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofShoot for the Stars --Shoot for the Stars (talk)22:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Locust member. Thank you for your work onTake Me by the Hand. Another editor,Skyshifter, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Skyshifter}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skyshiftertalk12:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fishmonger (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk)22:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleLet's Start Here you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)16:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On26 February 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleDo Hollywood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatJonathan Rado invitedthe Lemon Twigs to recordtheir debut album at his house while they were on a school break? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Do Hollywood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Do Hollywood), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk)00:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLet's Start Here you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Let's Start Here andTalk:Let's Start Here/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)19:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleFishmonger (album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)18:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleI Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)14:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleI Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall for comments about the article, andTalk:I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)20:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleAstrid (song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)06:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On5 March 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleStoney (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatPost Malone publicly calledhis debut album "mediocre" less than a year after its release? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Stoney (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Stoney (album)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLet's Start Here you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Let's Start Here for comments about the article, andTalk:Let's Start Here/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)02:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also; whilst im not gonna pester you with it (that'd be sad af lmao), i would appreciate it if you did reviewSpeedin' Bullet 2 Heaven. mainly bc the way i wrote that article was def influenced by me reviewing stoney and glaive lp; especially the "song" summary-type sections which i'm still not confident and want to get better at writing basically. the last part is kinda the main reason. other than that idrc tbh dw //Chchcheckit (talk)02:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yess no worries at all, I was planning on it anyway haha. I'm really happy that you were inspired by my work for some of it. I'll snag the review :))Locust member (talk)02:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources only verify he’s the head of content. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Mano Sundaresan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia16:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Locust member!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia16:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFishmonger (album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Fishmonger (album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Fishmonger (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)20:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On10 March 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleAmerican Teenager, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatBarack Obama listedan anti-war song as one of his favorite songs of 2022? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/American Teenager. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,American Teenager), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

RoySmith(talk)00:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,688 views (653.7 per hour), making it one of themost viewed hooks of March 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk •contribs) (he/it)03:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Locust member, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!—Femke 🐦 (talk)18:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleContingency Song you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)15:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAstrid (song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Astrid (song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Astrid (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)20:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFuck This Town you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Fuck This Town andTalk:Fuck This Town/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)21:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleContingency Song you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Contingency Song andTalk:Contingency Song/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)22:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFuck This Town you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Fuck This Town for comments about the article, andTalk:Fuck This Town/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSkyshifter --Skyshifter (talk)15:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleContingency Song you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Contingency Song for comments about the article, andTalk:Contingency Song/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)11:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your hard work on upping the quality of articles related to the current hip hop underground! Thought it was really cool to seeKeep It Goin Xav as a GA.

joeyquism (talk)21:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for noticing my work!! I feel like that side of music is a bit under represented on here so I try my best to expand coverage on it.Locust member (talk)21:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Odnt.webp, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Binksternet (talk)20:08, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleSpiderr you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)18:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleOverseas (Ken Carson song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)15:03, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleSpiderr you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Spiderr for comments about the article, andTalk:Spiderr/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleOverseas (Ken Carson song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Overseas (Ken Carson song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Overseas (Ken Carson song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)00:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great work gettingSpiderr to GA status! I can see it's only one of numerous articles you've done great work on, you deserve a lot of recognition for your efforts. Best wishes and keep up the great work!TylerBurden (talk)22:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!Locust member (talk)23:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Bladee - Paranoia Intro.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! When I mentioned "GLAIVE GOOD TOPIC?" atTalk:Fuck This Town/GA1, I was actually mostly referring to the now complete good topic ofThen I'll Be Happy (EP),Cloak n Dagger andFuck This Town. I am surprised I didn't see theWP:GTC nomination coming up, so I guess I'd give you the heads up!Skyshiftertalk15:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OHHH I see! Thank u so much for pointing this out to me, I will nominate it!!Locust member (talk)01:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On31 March 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleFishmonger (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that while filming a music video for herdebut album at a motel,Underscores had the police called on her by the motel staff because they thought she was shooting a pornographic film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Fishmonger (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Fishmonger (album)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Cielquiparle (talk)00:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleTeen Week you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)17:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleJump Out you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)18:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Teen week 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Talk:Notability (music) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on thediscussion page. Thank you.Medxvo (talk)18:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleRed Light (Bladee album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)05:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRed Light (Bladee album) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Red Light (Bladee album) andTalk:Red Light (Bladee album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)06:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleExeter (album) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Exeter (album) andTalk:Exeter (album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)07:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRed Light (Bladee album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Red Light (Bladee album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Red Light (Bladee album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)03:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJump Out you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Jump Out for comments about the article, andTalk:Jump Out/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)13:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleExeter (album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Exeter (album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Exeter (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCatchMe --CatchMe (talk)23:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleTeen Week you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Teen Week for comments about the article, andTalk:Teen Week/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChchcheckit --Chchcheckit (talk)11:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleTake Me by the Hand you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMaranoFan --MaranoFan (talk)02:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAfraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHypebeast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleI Didn't Mean to Haunt You you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)13:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleFrailty (Jane Remover album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)18:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleI Didn't Mean to Haunt You you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You for comments about the article, andTalk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLastJabberwocky --LastJabberwocky (talk)20:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofTeen Week at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Flibirigit (talk)02:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yoyo. More Chaos is basically done, two things before i GA nom id like yr comment on:

• Should I specify the length between versions since CD/LP versions are 49 mins yet digital copies (which most reviews are based on) are 58/61 mins?
• Should I remove pierre from the production infobox in light of above info or specify like "digital versions feature pierre" or smth

that is literally it. all is done //Chchcheckit (talk)13:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yooo, nice quick work on it!

perTemplate:Infobox album, "only the length of the original album release should be entered" and typically only information from the standard edition of the album is entered in the infobox (so pierre would be removed in this case). but, is there a source that states the standard version of the album is the CD/LP versions instead of the digital and songs like 2000, evolution, and ghoul are not a part of the main album? afaik the album was originally released digitally so wouldn't that be the primary issue?Locust member (talk)14:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok nvm I just read theBillboard source that states "More Chaos was available in its first week as a standard 18-song album (on color vinyl and a widely available CD and in three deluxe boxed sets containing a T-shirt and CD) and in two widely available expanded digital/streaming editions that added three and four songs, respectively."

uhh so ya only enter the standard edition (LP/CD) times and remove pierre from infobox. both are still covered in track listing so we're goodLocust member (talk)14:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRisk (song) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Risk (song) andTalk:Risk (song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)20:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receivetournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24good articles, 28Did you know articles, and oneIn the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplierfeatured articles onBlack Widow (Natasha Romanova) andGrace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from fourfeatured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and agood topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognizeGeneralissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRisk (song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Risk (song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Risk (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMedxvo --Medxvo (talk)21:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFrailty (Jane Remover album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Frailty (Jane Remover album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Frailty (Jane Remover album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAverageuntitleduser --Averageuntitleduser (talk)02:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleStyle (2hollis song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPollosito --Pollosito (talk)03:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleAfraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofArconning --Arconning (talk)15:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleStyle (2hollis song) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Style (2hollis song) andTalk:Style (2hollis song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPollosito --Pollosito (talk)20:04, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleStyle (2hollis song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Style (2hollis song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Style (2hollis song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPollosito --Pollosito (talk)21:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAfraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofArconning --Arconning (talk)07:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Apologies for the random message, but I wanted to leave a comment aboutyour current FAC for "Contingency Song". Per the FAC instructions, it is discouraged to use use graphics or complex templates on FAC nomination pages as they slow down the page load time and can lead to potential errors in the FAC archives. For templates, I am referencing the ones like "Done" and "Added. I would kindly ask you to remove that from your current FAC. Apologies again for the random message. I just wanted to raise this to your attention, as it is easy to miss.Aoba47 (talk)01:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm so sorry! This is my first FAC so I was unaware of this rule (although I do see it on the FAC page now). I just removed them, sorry again for the error!Locust member (talk)02:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. Thank you for addressing this. Best of luck with your FAC! It is an easy thing to miss, as there is a lot to take in for first-time FAC nominators. It is not really a big deal, as it does not cause any real harm or anything. On a side note, I am always happy to see more songs in the FAC space, and I think that this song would bring some welcome diversity to the current pool of song FAs, as this song's genre is not really represented there.Aoba47 (talk)02:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! I agree, I would be really happy to get a song such as this one to FA, as there are not many songs of its nature at the status (like you said). Thank u again!!Locust member (talk)03:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have just nominated the article for a class review.Scientelensia (talk)19:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And a GA reviewScientelensia (talk)10:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, I just picked it up!Locust member (talk)22:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you!!Scientelensia (talk)10:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On20 May 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleTeen Week, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatJane Remover's school counselor made sure Remover felt fine after a classmate wrote an essay about lyrics fromTeen Week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Teen Week. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Teen Week), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleMichelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKyle Peake --Kyle Peake (talk)08:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMichelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) andTalk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKyle Peake --Kyle Peake (talk)09:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMichelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) for comments about the article, andTalk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKyle Peake --Kyle Peake (talk)09:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On17 June 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleFrailty (Jane Remover album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the cover art forJane Remover's debut album is a screenshot taken from Google Maps? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Frailty (Jane Remover album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Frailty (Jane Remover album)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk)00:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Days B4 III, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)01:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleMegatron (album) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCathodography --Cathodography (talk)02:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMegatron (album) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Megatron (album) for comments about the article, andTalk:Megatron (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCathodography --Cathodography (talk)18:04, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20good articles and 48did you know articles
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9featured topic articles, twofeatured articles, and four good articles
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16featured lists, 1featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleGhostholding you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCathodography --Cathodography (talk)01:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGhostholding you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Ghostholding for comments about the article, andTalk:Ghostholding/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCathodography --Cathodography (talk)00:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Locust member. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Days B4 III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!00:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofGhostholding at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Leafy46 (talk)00:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied.Locust member (talk)02:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have also just replied, please give it a look whenever you have a chance!Leafy46 (talk)03:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:SERG Restaurant Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleDrive-By Lullabies isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofRiley1012 --Riley1012 (talk)00:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

frailty is goated & so r uZszn (talk)02:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

❤️Locust member (talk)18:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleDrive-By Lullabies haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofRiley1012 --Riley1012 (talk)17:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited a lot of album pages and none have ever had the music section just copy pasting every single thing a writer has ever said about a track verbatim. That doesn't seem to be policy on Wikipedia album pages. I removed the redundant phrases. There were way too many quotes which also isn't normal practice on Wikipedia. I changed stuff to say "this track was compared to this" rather than a bunch of quotes from the same Pitchfork writer. The article almost felt like it was copy pasting most of the pitchfork review.Aradicus77 (talk)17:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also it wasn't well sourced. Look at the sources a lot of parts were just not even part of the source. Like when it says characterized by smooth vocals, go to the source, the source makes no mention of that.Aradicus77 (talk)17:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"From wavy and hypnotic production to silky flows, Xaviersobased keeps you wanting more." is stated inthe source; the way in which it was written, it changed the wording so it did not violate copyright.Locust member (talk)18:00, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but that has nothing to do with "smooth vocals". Anyway you can add what you think needs to be added, but reverting all my contributions when I went through each source to keep what was relevant and remove what wasn't stated makes no sense to me.Aradicus77 (talk)18:01, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Silky flows" = "smooth vocals". If something is silky, it is more often than not smooth. And how are flows presented? By vocals. I am going to go through the article and add back what I think is necessary because you did remove some pretty important details about certain songs.Locust member (talk)18:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If there were too many quotes, it would have failed the copyvio criteria in the good article review. Compared to other articles, this article did not have an abundance of quotes. Also, did you fully look through the sources in the section? There were definitely other refs than the p4k article. That article just happened to be the most in depth one about the mixtape. I'm going to redo the article and see if it fits your liking, as a composition section isneeded.

I recommend you look at which album articles are in good article criteria, and you will see that most have track-by-track coverage of the albums at topic.Locust member (talk)18:04, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how that got approved. The formatting was strange, it was this big paragraph for the lead and also the song analysis too. It wasn't clear. All I did was trim which is normal on wikipedia for when stuff is too cluttered. Most of that section was relying on mainly the p4k article and then a bunch of small 3-4 sentence reviews from sites like Fader.Aradicus77 (talk)18:07, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you "trimmed" (removed) a whole section that is a standard in album articles. Sure, did it include a lot of comparisons from journalists? Yes it did, but as a Wiki editor, you have to understand that WE report what the sources report. So since Pierre and other journalists made a lot of comparisons of the tracks on this mixtape to other songs, then we have to report that as well. I would, again like to direct you tothe large list of album good articles and look at how those are formatted / written. The fact that you have "edited a lot of album pages" does not really mean anything, asanyone can edit on Wikipedia. If you had multiple GAs/FAs under your belt, I would understand that, but I really do not think that you have understoodwhat exactly a traditional album page looks like (as stripping something as important as a Composition section really shows that).

I don't know how you thought the article was cluttered, as it is shorter than the majority of album articles, due to its limited sourcing. I reported what the sources gave me, and that's that. There was noOR or anything of that nature in the article. And if you can't understand how this article passed for GA, you could perhaps look at the review on the article'stalk page; also, when taking a look atearwig, this article is in the green. If this were in the yellow or red, I would understand what you mean by "I don't know how that got approved."

For the article itself, I really am struggling to find the issues with it. Each comparison in the Composition section makes more sense for them to be there rather than Critical reception. A comparison isn't necessarily an opinion most of the time; especially since the comparisons are track-by-track and do not cover the mixtape as a whole. Something such as "Darville said Nettspend's appearance on the track sounds like the American rapper and singer Lil Tracy" 100% makes more sense to be in Composition as, by nature, Darville isdescribing what Nettspend sounds like, rather than giving his thoughts and opinions on Nettspend's performance (whether he liked it or not, etc.) To me, the lead is clear and consise, and followsWP:LEAD, as it summarizes each section in a short amount of words. Also, if a reader were to wonder what this mixtape sounds like, they would most definitely go to the Composition section. They might see that some tracks were compared to Gucci Mane, while others were compared to Lil Tracy and French Montana. Now, of course, all readers will not be familiar with these names, but if they are, they will most definitely get a greater understanding of what this mixtape sounds like. That is the whole purpose of the section, and stripping the article of that is stripping readers from knowing what this mixtape sounds like without actually hearing it.

Also, you did more than trim the article, by adding "On January 27, 2024 Xavier released a music video for "Special," which was followed with a video for "Need Me," on November 30, 2024", which is not sourced at all, contradicting your earlier statement of saying the article "wasn't well sourced". On top of that, the sentence does not comply with Wikipedia's standards as, perMOS:YEAR, a comma would be needed after "2024" and perWP:INOROUT the comma would be outside of the quotations. Plus, how does "the latter track ends with an audio clip of him in conversation with the mixtape's host, DJ Rennesy during an interview, similar clips are placed throughout the album" relate to the Background section at all?

Regardless, I apologize for going on a rant aboutgood faith changes but I really am struggling to find what was wrong with the article in the first place. In all honesty, your contributions seem to not help the article and rather diminish its quality. I've reverted them again simply because I do not understand how they make the article better.Locust member (talk)18:33, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That page isn't my priority, not gonna edit war u on it but just letting u know why i made those changesAradicus77 (talk)18:08, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Mano Sundaresan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)17:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On11 August 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleMichelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the song "Michelle Pfeiffer" has been described as possessing "a cresting emotionality grand enough to fill the tallest IMAX screen"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,175 round points, mainly from sports-related articles, including 17 good articles, 27 did you know articles, and 9in the news articles
• Arconning (submissions) with 1,090 round points, mainly from articles about athletes and politicians, including afeatured article onPhilippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics, 9good articles, 28did you know articles, and a wide assortment of featured and good article reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 854 round points, mostly from a high-scoring featured article on the Indian leaderRani of Jhansi and two good articles, in addition to 13 featured and good article reviews

Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12featured lists, 98 good articles, 9good topic articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges –Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs),Frostly (talk ·contribs),Guerillero (talk ·contribs) andLee Vilenski (talk ·contribs) – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On2 September 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleGhostholding, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that a music publication apologized after reporting thatGhostholding was the work of a fictional indie rock band? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Ghostholding. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Ghostholding), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Locust member. This message concerns theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Mano Sundaresan".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with ourdraftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission, and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!DreamRimmer bot II (talk)17:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit toGender binary did not have anedit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should beexplained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on thetalk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may bequite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to yourWikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by settingPreferences →Editing →Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.Only37.5% of your edits have edit summaries.Fred Gandt ·talk ·contribs19:20, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleJRJRJR isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofNub098765 --Nub098765 (talk)07:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleJRJRJR has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofNub098765 --Nub098765 (talk)20:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleJRJRJR haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofNub098765 --Nub098765 (talk)07:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I am just curious to know if you plan to GAN this anytime soon. It seems ready for GA status, and with this being one of my favorite Bladee albums I had to ask :)Skyshiftertalk01:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!! Just nominated it.Locust member (talk)03:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seenhere), are:

1. BeanieFan11 (submissions) with1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
2. Gog the Mild (submissions) with1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
3. Arconning (submissions) with860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
4. History6042 (submissions) with804 tournament points
5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with635 tournament points
6. TheDoctorWho (submissions) with386 tournament points
7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with373 tournament points
8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with362 tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes
• vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2featured articles, 4featured lists, 106good articles, 5good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76did you know articles, and 9in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3
• History6042 (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• TheDoctorWho (submissions) wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total
• Arconning (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 27 good articles in round 3, and 45 good article reviews in round 1
• Tails Wx (submissions), with 10 in the news articles in round 3

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited tosign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges,Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs ·email),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs ·email),Frostly (talk ·contribs ·email),Guerillero (talk ·contribs ·email) andLee Vilenski (talk ·contribs ·email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleForeign Exchange (album) isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLEvalyn --LEvalyn (talk)01:21, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC